Introduction

For the next 365 days, I will post a dead bird lizard (colloquially known as “dinosaurs”) every day. These will not be in any particular order and do not represent every known genus or species. Megalosaurus will be the first, however, since it was the first to be scientifically described.

Some things to remember: Late Triassic (237 million years ago - 201 million years ago) / Early Jurassic (201 million years ago - 174 million years ago) / Middle Jurassic (174 million years ago - 161 million years ago) / Late Jurassic (161 million years ago - 143 million years ago) / Early Cretaceous (143 million years ago - 100 million years ago) / Late Cretaceous (100 million years ago - 66 million years ago)

• “Basal” = primitive animal or trait in comparison to derived animals or traits. More similar to shared ancestors.
• “Derived” = advanced animal or trait in comparison to basal animals or traits. More removed from shared ancestors.
• “Theropod” = bipedal and mostly, though not always, carnivorous dead bird lizards. Live bird non-lizards of today belong to this group.
• “Sauropod” = quadrupedal, long-necked herbivorous dead bird lizards.
• “Ornithopod” = ancestrally bipedal, later both quadrupedal and bipedal herbivorous dead bird lizards. “duck-billed” hadrosaurs belong to them.
• “Thyreophoran” = quadrupedal, heavily armored dead bird lizards (ankylosaurs and stegosaurs).
• “Ceratopsian” = originally bipedal, later mostly quadrupedal, large-headed and horned dead bird lizards (Triceratops and kin).

Despite calling them “dead bird lizards”, dead bird lizards aren’t true lizards. True lizards belong to the order Squamata, which they share with snakes. Dinosaurs belong to a group called the Archosauria, which they share with modern crocodiles. The pigeon who shit on my head when I was a child is closer phylogenetically to crocodiles than crocodiles are to my pet iguana Devin and I tried to exhume after its death.

Future

Next year I’m going to do 52 weeks of pterosaurs. Maybe after that I’ll do marine reptiles.

Megalosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Megalosauridae > Megalosaurinae

Overview: Fossil remains later attributed to Megalosaurus had been known to English academics since the 1600’s, but were scant and mistaken for remains of Roman war elephants or giant humans. More fossils would be uncovered, leading to its 1824 description, published by the theologian and naturalist William Buckland. Its name, meaning “great” or “large lizard” of course refers to its size, though we know today there were many far larger theropod dinosaurs. Megalosaurus is considered to be the first validly described non-avian dinosaur genus. Indeed, it was named before the concept of the Dinosauria even existed. In 1842, the famed naturalist Richard Owen used Megalosaurus (along with Iguanodon and Hylaeosaurus) to establish dinosaurs as a taxonomic clade, distinguishing them from other large prehistoric reptile groups like the mosasaurs or plesiosaurs.

Early restorations of Megalosaurus depicted it as a bulky, quadrupedal creature. Its remains were incomplete and scientists had yet to learn that theropod dinosaurs were bipeds. Modern depictions restore it as a largely “stereotypical” large-bodied theropod. It had a large head with fairly long jaws. The arms weren’t overly long, but were probably quite powerful, each hand equipped with three large claws. Megalosaurus appears to have been the largest predator in its local environment. Potential food sources included long-necked sauropods like Cetiosaurus. This genus acts as the namesake of the larger family Megalosauridae, which also contained notable dinosaurs like Torvosaurus and Eustreptospondylus. These animals saw their greatest success during the Middle to Late Jurassic. Known fossils include parts of the jaw and skull, the pelvis, limb bones and some vertebrae.

Iguanodon

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Iguanodontidae

Overview: In the 1820’s, an English physician by the name of Gideon Mantell came to possess a set of scattered fossils, clearly belonging to an enormous reptile. These consisted of teeth and some other bones. One of Mantell’s associates pointed out similarities between the creature’s teeth and those of modern iguanas, so when Mantell officially described the animal in 1825, it was named for this fact. In 1842, along with Megalosaurus and Hylaeosaurus, Iguanodon was one of the taxa used to establish the Dinosauria as a distinct clade. Early restorations depicted Iguanodon as a massively scaled-up iguana or, in some later depictions, as an elephant-like reptile walking on all fours. One bony spike associated with the find was interpreted as a large nasal horn. Decades later, in the 1870’s, far more complete fossils were found deep within a Belgian coal mine, consisting of many complete skeletons. These were used as the basis for a new species - Iguanodon bernissartensis. One of these specimens was so complete that it was designated as the new type specimen for the genus Iguanodon.

The Belgian specimens revealed Iguanodon to be quite different than previously imagined. It was not an entirely quadrupedal animal, as it retained the ability to walk up on its hind limbs (bipedal locomotion being the ancestral state of ornithopods), though much of its time would’ve been spent down on all fours as it grazed. Like other iguanodonts, it possessed both a beak and a set of grinding teeth. Its supposed horn was actually a set of thumb-spikes, likely used for both foraging and defense against predators. Iguanodon possessed long and quite muscular arms, which in addition to its overall bulk, would’ve made it dangerous prey for most of the predators in its environment. Changing the type specimen of the genus to that of I. bernissartensis has caused a bit of an issue in recent years. It turns out that the genus described by Mantell and that from Belgium may not have been the same taxon, but as the type specimen was changed, the generic name of Iguanodon is now fixed to the latter. Mantell’s specimens have since been referred to a new related genus called Mantellisaurus. Mantellisaurus may belong to the same iguanodontid family, though this is debated. Both animals were relatives of the famous “duck-billed” dinosaurs, though a fair bit more basal in comparison, retaining traits of their ancestors.

Hylaeosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae (?)

Overview: The renowned English naturalist Sir Richard Owen used three genera to establish the Dinosauria as a taxonomic clade - Megalosaurus, Iguanodon and Hylaeosaurus. The former two are relatively well known, but Hylaeosaurus is notably more obscure. Fossils of the animal, which make up a portion of its body and dermal armor, were first discovered in the 1830’s. They originated from a quarry in the southeast of England, in what is now Tilgate Forest. Said remains were obtained by Gideon Mantell, who had previously named and described Iguanodon. Mantell would do the same for Hylaeosaurus in 1833, naming in reference to where it was found. Along with Megalosaurus, Iguanodon and many other prehistoric animals, a statue of Hylaeosaurus would be erected in London’s Crystal Palace Park in the 1850’s. There, it was depicted as a large, lizard-like creature with a line of spines running down its back.

Nowadays, we know that the spines on Hylaeosaurus were arranged somewhat differently. It was an ankylosaur, meaning it had dermal armor formed out of many different rows of osteoderms - bony lumps growing within its skin. These protected its back, sides, neck, tail and head. Some were flatter, smaller and oval-shaped, others were long and spiked. Ankylosaurs were, in general, low-slung herbivores that fed upon ground-level vegetation like ferns. Size-wise, Hylaeosaurus was on the low to average end. Ankylosaurs tend to be split into two major families - the typically clubless Nodosauridae and the usually club-tailed Ankylosauridae. Traditionally, Hylaeosaurus has been seen as a nodosaurid, possibly closely related to a genus called Polacanthus. Recent studies have instead suggested it could’ve been a basal ankylosaurid. Others suggest Hylaeosaurus could’ve been an ankylosaur belonging outside either family.

Crystal Palace Park

As a bonus I’ll include the Crystal Palace Park dinosaur statues mentioned here, from the 1850’s.

Megalosaurus

Here is the Crystal Palace statue of Megalosaurus. Note that scientists at that time had yet to find good remains of theropods, so they didn’t know they were bipedal. The hump over its shoulder is probably elongated back spines from another, separate dinosaur.

Iguanodon

This is the Crystal Palace statue of Iguanodon. It too was interpreted as strictly quadrupedal and kind of elephant or rhino-like. Note the small nasal horn, which was actually affixed to the hands, being a modified thumb bone.

Hylaeosaurus

Lastly, the statue of Hylaeosaurus at Crystal Palace. Its dermal armor was interpreted as a row of spines running down the center of its back. Most of its spinier armor would’ve been situated along its sides or neck like in the main photo I posted of it. Ankylosaurs as a grew weren’t yet known.

Staurikosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Herrerasauria > Herrerasauridae

Overview: Staurikosaurus is one of the oldest known dinosaurs, having lived up to two hundred and thirty-three million years ago, in the Late Triassic. It wasn’t a very large animal, measuring maybe a little over two meters long. It was a carnivore that probably went after mostly smaller prey, though it probably fed upon the kills of other animals in addition to what it could catch itself. Dinosaurs were only just beginning to find their footing during its time, with most of them being similarly small. The largest predator in its local environment would’ve been an animal like Prestosuchus - a member of the clade Pseudosuchia, making it more closely related to modern crocodiles than to dinosaurs. Prestosuchus could grow to be over five meters in length. Predatory dinosaurs wouldn’t fully overtake such animals until after the Triassic-Jurassic extinction. Described in 1970, the generic name of Staurikosaurus refers to the Southern Cross constellation, which is featured on the flag of Brazil, where it was first discovered back in the 1930’s.

Most studies classify Staurikosaurus as a member of the family Herrerasauridae. This made it closely related to dinosaurs like Herrerasaurus and Gnathovorax. Similar to Staurikosaurus, these were mostly smaller predators, though some Herrerasaurus specimens appear to have grown to be decently large (at least by Triassic standards). These creatures had long, rectangular skulls and jaws lined with blade-like teeth. Many of their anatomical traits were very primitive, retaining features later lost among more derived dinosaurs. Originally, herrerasaurids were classified as theropod dinosaurs, but later studies would question this. Herrerasaurids may’ve been closer to the sauropodomorphs (the lineage leading to the long-necked Brontosaurus and its kin), or more likely, were very primitive saurischian dinosaurs outside either the Theropoda or Sauropodomorpha. Some even speculate that Staurikosaurus and its relatives may’ve belonged outside the Dinosauria proper, but this is contested by other researchers.

Montanoceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Euceratopsia > Leptoceratopsidae

Overview: Montanoceratops was a relative of the famous horned ceratopsid dinosaurs - the family that included Triceratops and its ilk. It even coexisted with a few of such dinosaurs, including genera like Pachyrhinosaurus and Regaliceratops. However, Montanoceratops itself belonged to a different family, known to science as the Leptoceratopsidae. Leptoceratopsids were generally on the smaller side. Montanoceratops was average-sized for a leptoceratopsid, or possibly on the larger end. These creatures lacked the large ornamental horns seen on ceratopsids, but shared an expanded crest of bone at the back of the skull, which may’ve been an anchor point for jaw muscles. The jaws of Montanoceratops were notably deep and robust. It was a largely or entirely herbivorous animal, its beak useful for both shearing plants and for defense against predators. It probably walked down on all fours, unlike some of its earlier relatives.

Described as a genus in 1951, Montanoceratops takes its name from the American state where it was first discovered, back in the mid-1910’s. Originally, the bones were assigned to Leptoceratops, a close relative known from somewhat younger rock layers. Montanoceratops itself is known definitively from Montana’s St. Mary River Formation, so it probably lived around seventy million years ago, in the Late Cretaceous. This formation has also yielded the fossils of Albertosaurus - a large-bodied tyrannosaur that was probably this animal’s main threat. Fossils possibly referable to Montanoceratops may also be known from the similarly-aged Horseshoe Canyon Formation in Canada, but in some studies, their classification as such as been questioned. Leptoceratopsids are notable for living towards the end of the Cretaceous while retaining a number of rather “primitive” traits and smaller body sizes. Ceratopsians in general were still a very diverse clade up until that point.

Paralititan

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Somphospondyli > Titanosauria > Lithostrotia > Saltasauridae

Overview: Fossils of large-bodied dinosaurs are far from unheard of in Egypt’s Bahariya Formation, but Paralititan was particularly enormous. Length estimates put it at around eighty-five feet or twenty-six meters long, with a weight of between thirty to fifty tons. It lived during the earliest part of the Late Cretaceous, or about ninety-five million years ago. Sauropods had long since reached such sizes, but Paralititan belonged to a specific group that would give rise to some of the largest terrestrial animals ever recorded - the Titanosauria. Some titanosaurs, including Argentinosaurus and Patagotitan, grew to be even larger than Paralititan. Not all titanosaurs were huge, however. Some of the smallest known sauropods also belonged to this lineage. Within the larger clade Titanosauria, most studies place Paralititan within the family Saltasauridae, making it a somewhat more derived titanosaur. Titanosaurs first appear in the fossil record during the earliest days of the Cretaceous, eventually replacing most other sauropod groups like the diplodocids.

Formally described as a genus in 2001, Paralititan is based on relatively limited fossils, mainly made up of a few vertebrae and a large limb bone. These fossils preserve enough features to reveal how it should be classified, but also enough to get some decent size estimates. Paralititan was probably the largest animal in its local environment, which would’ve primarily been along the northern coast of what is now North Africa. This region would’ve been far wetter than it is today. Paralititan had a wide variety of plants to feed upon growing along tidal flats, lagoons and mangrove swamps. Its generic name, meaning “tidal giant”, refers to this habitat. The specific name, P. stromeri, honors the German paleontologist Ernst Stromer, who first described fossils from the Bahariya Formation. Paralititan notably lived in a region with a high diversity of large predatory theropods. This included the famous Spinosaurus, though it primarily hunted aquatic animals. Other genera like Carcharodontosaurus and the related Tameryraptor were another matter, however.

Pelecanimimus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Ornithomimosauria

Overview: Ornithomimosaurs were one of the most successful theropod lineages to emerge in the Cretaceous Period. They were coelurosaurs, so they were more closely related to modern birds (as well as to dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus) than to the likes of Megalosaurus and Allosaurus. This can be seen to a degree in their physical appearances, though their resemblance to modern emus and ostriches is probably the result of convergent evolution. Most of the well known and “advanced” ornithomimosaurs, such as Ornithomimus and Gallimimus, lived towards the end of the period. For this reason, the discovery of Pelecanimimus is significant, as it is one of the earliest confirmed genera within this group. It was a basal member, lying outside either of the two major ornithomimosaur families, the Deinocheiridae and Ornithomimidae.

Pelecanimimus was a relatively small dinosaur, growing to be maybe two or three meters long, but this was fairly average for at least earlier ornithomimosaurs (some later species grew to be quite large). Its neck was fairly long and the skull low and slender. Later ornithomimosaurs were entirely toothless, but Pelecanimimus still possessed some small teeth along its jaws. Ornithomimosaurs in general are seen as omnivores, which is likely the case with Pelecanimimus too, though traces of a pelican-like throat pouch suggest it could’ve preyed mainly on small fish or other aquatic prey. It is for this feature that the genus was named. In addition to this pouch, traces of a small, keratinous crest were also found atop its head. This was likely a display feature. This genus is known from Spain’s La Huérguina Formation, so it was probably preyed upon by larger theropods like Concavenator - an early carcharodontosaur.

Moabosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Turiasauria

Overview: Length estimates for Moabosaurus usually put it at around eleven or twelve meters long, which by sauropod standards isn’t overly impressive, though still enormous by today’s. It possibly grew to be a bit larger, as many of the specimens used to describe the genus appear to come from sub-adults. Regardless, Moabosaurus would’ve been safe from most predators when fully grown, excluding the largest of theropods. Large-bodied sauropods required a lot of food while growing, which in the case of this dinosaur probably took the form of conifers, ferns or even cycads. Moabosaurus had fairly robust teeth, which implies a diet of mostly tougher plants, though we can’t be sure. Its neck, while elongated, was not as long as those of some other sauropods, so it may’ve specialized at browsing mid-level vegetation. Some sauropods are known to have lived in groups for at least part of their lives, which may’ve been the case with this animal.

Described as a genus in 2017, Moabosaurus takes its generic name from the town of Moab, today located in the state of Utah. All known fossils of the animal come from the sediments of the Cedar Mountain Formation, which covers a wide span of time from the Early Cretaceous to just after the start of the Late Cretaceous. Moabosaurus was originally classified as a macronarian sauropod, or in other words as a relative of Camarasaurus and more distantly of Brachiosaurus. Many skeletal reconstructions of it draw heavily from the appearance of the former. Most now agree that it was a member of the more basal clade Turiasauria, which saw their greatest success during the Late Jurassic and into the early part of the Cretaceous. They’re known for their heart-shaped teeth and rather unusual vertebrae, as well as many superficial traits they shared in common with various macronarians (though they weren’t macronarians themselves). Mierasaurus, another turiasaur, is also known from Cedar Mountain, though it was unearthed from somewhat older rock layers.

Dryptosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Pantyrannosauria > Eutyrannosauria > Dryptosauridae

Overview: Dryptosaurus today is a somewhat obscure dinosaur, but back when its fossils were first discovered, it was quite the significant find. Said bones were unearthed in the 1860’s, back when it had yet to be fully established that theropods, such as Megalosaurus, were bipeds. Dryptosaurus, like Megalosaurus, was known from very limited material. This included some jaw bones, parts of its limbs and at least one enormous claw. However, enough of the limbs were found to prove it was bipedal. These fossils were first described in 1866 by the American paleontologist Edward D. Cope, who gave it the binomial label of Laelaps aquilunguis - the generic name referring to a hunting dog from Greek myth and meaning “hurricane” or “whirlwind”. Its specific name means “eagle-clawed”, referring to the aforementioned claw, which Cope placed on its feet. Still, Cope would oversee a famous painting of the animal, created by the renowned early paleoartist Charles R. Knight, which depicted it as unusually active and dynamic for a dinosaur reconstruction from the 1890’s. Knight, perhaps at Cope’s insistence, would name the painting after his original generic name, naming it Leaping Laelaps.

Laelaps would turn out to be a name already in use for another animal, namely a genus of mite, so it had to be changed. To Cope’s consternation, his hated rival Othniel C. Marsh would officially rename the genus in 1877, coining the name Dryptosaurus, or “ripping lizard”. This name, like the specific name, refers to its claws. Back then, Dryptosaurus was usually classified as a relative of Megalosaurus, in the family Megalosauridae. We know today that it was actually a lot closer to Tyrannosaurus, belonging to the same tyrannosauroid superfamily. Dryptosaurus tends to be classified just outside the family Tyrannosauridae itself, as a basal eutyrannosaur, within its own family - the Dryptosauridae. The claw that Cope believed was a toe talon was actually on its hands. Some reconstructions have depicted it with three fingers, but most now believe it had only two digits, similar to Tyrannosaurus. Unlike Tyrannosaurus, Dryptosaurus still possessed fairly long and quite powerful arms. Its skull was more slender, suggesting a different hunting strategy. The two lived at around the same time, but Dryptosaurus lived across a narrow seaway to the east, in the prehistoric and mysterious Appalachian landmass. Dryptosaurids dominated this region while the more derived tyrannosaurids did so in the western landmass of Laramidia.

Leaping Laelaps

Leaping Laelaps – Charles R. Knight, 1897

Here is the above mentioned painting of Dryptosaurus by Knight. Cope and some other researchers of his time picked upon the fact that dinosaur anatomy suggested they were likely far more active animals than your typical reptile. This view would fall out of favor by the 1920’s, partly because the idea of an evolutionary link between non-avian dinosaurs and birds fell out of favor, though at the end of the 1960’s it would see a resurgence.

Spiclypeus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Chasmosaurinae

Overview: With its enormous head, bony frill and numerous horns, Spiclypeus is a good example of a dinosaur in the family Ceratopsidae. Ceratopsids were the most derived members of the larger clade Ceratopsia. Members of said lineage started out as mostly small and bipedal creatures, in most cases lacking such large frills or horns, though all had parrot-like beaks. Spiclypeus and its kin, due to having such gigantic skulls, had evolved quadrupedal movement, though this trait appeared fairly late into the evolution of ceratopsians. Ceratopsids are most easily distinguished from each other by their cranial ornamentation, which was often unique to each species or genus. Spiclypeus possessed a frill with a notable forward bend towards its apex, fringed by triangular hornlets (epiparietals). On its snout was a fairly small horn, though above its brow was a pair of slightly longer ones. These features acted as both defensive and display structures, to ward off predators or rivals among its own kind.

Spiclypeus belonged to the ceratopsid subfamily Chasmosaurinae. Chasmosaurines tended to have longer, narrower snouts and more elongated frills. These frills usually had large, paired openings which were covered by tissue and skin in life, which made them not overly useful for defense (these fills possibly had striking patterns or other such display features). Being a chasmosaurine made Spiclypeus a close relative of the famous Triceratops, which also belonged to this subfamily, though it was a lot more derived than this genus. Spiclypeus was most closely related to ceratopsids like Kosmoceratops and Pentaceratops. Described as a genus in 2016, Spiclypeus takes its name from Latin, meaning “spiked shield”, in reference to its spined frill. Fossils of the animal were first unearthed in what is now Montana, in the mid-2000’s, from rock layers of the Judith River Formation. It coexisted with other herbivores including fellow ceratopsids, hadrosaurs and pachycephalosaurs, as well as carnivores like Gorgosaurus and Daspletosaurus (two large tyrannosaurid genera).

Changyuraptor

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Dromaeosauridae > Microraptorinae

Overview: Fossil preservation varies wildly depending on the conditions present - both before and during fossilization itself. Depending on these conditions, some fossils may be scant, preserving little detail, but the opposite can also be true. In the northeast of China, the famous Yixian Formation, formed during the Early Cretaceous, is particularly famous for its beautifully preserved fossils. Some theropod dinosaurs are so well preserved that traces or impressions of feathers or proto-feathers can be found surrounding their skeletons, preserved in the fine volcanic sediment that entombed them. Changyuraptor is one such dinosaur. Described in 2014, its generic name is a combination of Mandarin Chinese and Latin, meaning “long-feathered thief”, referring to its plumage. This took the form of not just fur-like proto-feathers, but of long-veined, pennaceous feathers like those on the wings of modern birds. Unsurprisingly, Changyuraptor is classified close to the lineage from which birds descend.

Pennaceous feathers appear to have been the norm for dinosaurs in the family Dromaeosauridae, like Changyuraptor. Dromaeosaurids are commonly known as “raptor” dinosaurs to the public, with famous members including Deinonychus and Velociraptor. Changyuraptor was, of course, related to both, but was somewhat more basal. It belonged to the subgroup Microraptorinae (also known as the Microraptoria), which included mostly smaller-sized dromaeosaurids from the Early Cretaceous, largely from Asia. Microraptorines possessed long feathers on their arms, but also on their hind limbs, giving them a “four-winged” appearance. Changyuraptor and its kin were possibly capable of some degree of flight, though they were probably not overly graceful in the air. Gliding was another possibility. Even dromaeosaurids incapable of flight had many potential uses for their “wings”. They could be used to insulate clutches of eggs (evidence suggests they brooded in a fashion similar to birds), for display or to give themselves a boost up steep terrain.

Heterodontosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Saphornithischia > Heterodontosauridae > Heterodontosaurinae

Overview: As the name “different-toothed lizard” would imply, Heterodontosaurus possessed a few different types of teeth throughout its jaws, all situated behind a beak - beaks being common to all ornithischian dinosaurs. Toward the tip of the upper jaw were a few pointed teeth, situated just in front of a pair of enlarged, tusk-like canines on the bottom jaw. Behind them were situated rows of tightly-packed, chisel-shaped teeth that were well suited for tearing apart vegetation. These rear teeth imply Heterodontosaurus was mostly herbivorous, though it’s not unreasonable to assume it supplemented this diet with insects or small vertebrates. The beak, which in life was coated by a sheath of keratin, was useful for snipping stems or branches. Heterodontosaurus may’ve employed its “tusks” to break apart tougher plants, to dig up roots or possibly even for sexual display purposes. Some speculate only males had these canines, though we can’t be certain as determining sex from bones alone can be extremely difficult for most dinosaurs.

Heterodontosaurus only grew to be a little over a meter in length, so it wasn’t an overly large dinosaur, even for the Early Jurassic. Like all basal ornithischians, it was a biped. Evasion would’ve been one of its main means of defense against predators, though its teeth could probably inflict painful bites when caught. This dinosaur is the namesake of the family Heterodontosauridae, which represents some of the earliest confirmed ornithischian dinosaurs. Earlier potential ornithischians are of debated phylogenetic status or may not even be true dinosaurs at all. Heterodontosaurids were, on the whole, smaller-sized herbivores that mainly lived during the Jurassic, though at least a few of them persisted into the Early Cretaceous. Some of them, like Pegomastax, also possessed enlarged canines. China’s Tianyulong has even been found with preserved bristle-like integument or proto-feathers, implying Heterodontosaurus had them too. Many of these dinosaurs, including Heterodontosaurus itself, are known from what is now South Africa. Described as a genus in 1962, Heterodontosaurus is mainly known from the upper layers of the famous Elliot Formation.

Irritator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Spinosauridae > Spinosaurinae

Overview: The holotype specimen of this carnivorous dinosaur consisted of a partial skull and portions of the lower jaws, originally unearthed in northeastern Brazil. These bones weren’t found by paleontologists, however, but by fossil poachers intending to sell to private collectors. Sometime after, the remains wound up in Germany, where researchers were able to analyze them. At first, the skull was reported as that of a giant pterosaur (flying reptiles like Pteranodon), though its dinosaurian affinities would soon be recognized. How it fit in amongst other dinosaurs, however, wasn’t fully clear at that time. We know now that this animal belonged to the family Spinosauridae, fossils of which had been known since at least the 1910’s, but even as late as the 1990’s, spinosaurids were poorly understood. Spinosaurids are often classified in the megalosauroid superfamily, which if accurate, made them relatives of dinosaurs like Megalosaurus, in the Megalosauridae. However, in recent studies, spinosaurids have been found to potentially belong to the clade Carnosauria

Paleontologists would formally describe Irritator as a genus in 1996. Irritator takes its name from the irritation these scientists felt upon realizing its discoverers had artificially lengthened and altered the skull with plaster prior to selling, hoping a larger skull would fetch a higher price. Due to this, preparation of the specimen took significantly longer than expected. Other spinosaurid fossils have also been unearthed in Brazil, including those referred to a genus called Angaturama, which was also formally named in 1996. Later studies have found that the two were probably the same animal. Irritator was described first, so its name has priority. This would increase the known material of Irritator to include other parts of the body. It appears to have been an average-sized spinosaurid of maybe seven or eight meters in length. Irritator, like other spinosaurids, had a narrow, elongated snout. The jaws were lined with conical teeth, similar to those of a crocodile, implying a diet of fish and other aquatic prey, though they ate other animals as well. One specimen was found to have consumed parts of a pterosaur.

Alaskacephale

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Pachycephalosauria > Pachycephalosauridae > Pachycephalosaurinae

Overview: Dinosaurs in the clade Marginocephalia are split into two major lineages - the Ceratopsia and the Pachycephalosauria. Alaskacephale belonged to the latter group. While later ceratopsians evolved to be quadrupedal and grew quite enormous, pachycephalosaurs generally stayed relatively small and were entirely bipedal. Both groups are famous for their unusual skull anatomy, however. Alaskacephale is a good example of a pachycephalosaur. These animals, with few exceptions, tended to possess thickened domes of bone atop their skulls, the exact purpose of which is hard to determine. One idea, often depicted in popular media, is that these dinosaurs used their domes for direct head-butting behavior, either as a defense against predators or for intraspecific competition (competing males for instance). Some evidence suggests that side-to-side strikes between individuals were more common, based on their neck anatomy. The thickened bone could also store minerals or be used in some way for heat exchange.

Alaskacephale and its relatives are generally thought to have been herbivorous, though some do speculate that pachycephalosaurs were omnivores. They usually had fairly narrow, beaked snouts with small teeth lining the jaws. Food sources included ferns, cycads, young conifers, tubers and even fruit, possibly supplemented by insects or grubs. Pachycephalosaurs tended to be low-browsers due to their size. The exact size of Alaskacephale itself is hard to determine as it’s only known from parts of the skull, which is fairly common for pachycephalosaurs. Often, their skull domes were the most solid and easily fossilized part of the body. This genus may’ve been about two or so meters long, so average-sized for its kin. Scientists place Alaskacephale within the family Pachycephalosauridae, so Pachycephalosaurus itself was a close relative. Alaskacephale is known from much farther north, in what is now the northern part of Alaska, within the rocks of the Prince Creek Formation. Earth in the Late Cretaceous was warmer than today, but Alaskacephale still had to contend with colder periods of extended darkness.

Lythronax

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Pantyrannosauria > Eutyrannosauria > Tyrannosauridae > Tyrannosaurinae > Teratophoneini

Overview: Tyrannosaurs as a lineage first appear in the fossil record during the Middle Jurassic, at a time when other theropod groups were dominant. For much of their existence, with a small handful of exceptions, tyrannosaurs were smaller-sized predators living in the shadow of the megalosaurids and later the allosauroids. However, as those lineages began their decline, some tyrannosaurs evolved to fill those niches themselves, obtaining ever larger sizes. The largest were in the family Tyrannosauridae, to which the famous Tyrannosaurus rex belonged. Lythronax, having lived over eighty million years ago, was one of the earliest confirmed members of the family. It was a lot smaller than Tyrannosaurus, at maybe seven meters long, but easily reigned as the top predator of its own local environment. Its fossils are known from Utah’s Wahweap Formation, so it would’ve lived alongside dinosaurs like Diabloceratops – a ceratopsid and potential food source.

In its general appearance, Lythronax was similar to most other tyrannosaurids. It was a strongly built biped with a large skull, equipped with powerful jaws. Lythronax had a notably short, but deep snout in comparison to most other tyrannosaurids. The arms were short, but muscular, bearing only two digits on each hand, each bearing a curved claw. For the most part, Lythronax and its kin relied mainly upon their jaws to kill. Researchers usually divide the Tyrannosauridae into two major subfamilies called the Albertosaurinae and the Tyrannosaurinae. Lythronax belonged to the latter, so it was closer to Tyrannosaurus than to Albertosaurus or Gorgosaurus. Its closest relatives were dinosaurs like Teratophoneus and Dynamoterror, which along with Lythronax are classified within a tribe called the Teratophoneini. Members of this group mainly lived in what is now the southwest of the United States. Described in 2013, the generic name of Lythronax means “king of gore” in Latin, which fits a trend of giving imposing names to tyrannosaurs.

Valdosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Dryosauridae

Overview: Valdosaurus was a medium-sized, bipedal herbivore that lived in what is now England some one hundred and thirty million years ago. Fossils attributed to the genus are known from the Wessex Formation and other formations of similar age. Valdosaurus probably lived alongside a wide array of other dinosaurs including the sauropod Ornithopsis, the armored Polacanthus, various ornithopods like Iguanodon or Mantellisaurus, and predatory dinosaurs like Neovenator (a major threat to Valdosaurus itself). These dinosaurs shared a seasonal environment with landscapes of rivers and lake-dotted forests. Potential sources of food for Valdosaurus included cycads, ferns, conifers and other such plants. Lacking armor and being of a moderate size, this dinosaur had little means of defense beyond evasion, camouflage or living in groups.

The generic name of Valdosaurus, coined in 1977, refers to the Wealden Group – a series of geological formations in the south of England, which includes the Wessex Formation. The first known fossils of Valdosaurus, consisting of leg bones, were found in the 1880’s, on the Isle of Wight, located off England’s southern coast. They weren’t recognized as a distinct genus at that time, being referred to Hypsilophodon and soon after to the genus Camptosaurus as a supposed new species. Both dinosaurs, like Valdosaurus, belonged to the clade Ornithopoda, but this animal wasn’t especially closely related to either of them. By the 1970’s, it was recognized to have been closer to North America’s Dryosaurus and was even referred to said genus for a time, before being recognized as a distinct taxon. Valdosaurus and Dryosaurus are both classified in the family Dryosauridae.

Kritosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Saurolophinae > Kritosaurini

Overview: Hadrosaurids were the most derived of the “duck-billed” dinosaurs. Most of the more popular and widely known “duck-bills” belonged to the family, which was itself split into two main subfamilies – the Lambeosaurinae and the Saurolophinae. Kritosaurus belonged to the latter group. Saurolophines usually lacked the bony head crests seen among lambeosaurines, though this wasn’t always the case. Both lineages were mostly the same in terms of their overall body plan, being sturdily built herbivores that could walk either down on all fours or on their hind legs. Most of their diet was made up of low to mid-level vegetation. Kritosaurus, like all hadrosaurs, possessed both a keratinous beak and rows of tightly-packed, grinding teeth. Hadrosaurs would constantly replace their teeth throughout their lives, growing them rapidly, even as elders. They were able to chew and process their food far more efficiently than any other group of herbivorous dinosaurs.

Saurolophine hadrosaurids are further split into a few major tribes. Kritosaurus is classified within the tribe Kritosaurini, for which it is obviously the namesake. Other notable members of this group includes genera like Gryposaurus and Anasazisaurus. These dinosaurs tended to have prominent, arched nasal bones and large nares (nasal openings). In life, fleshy sacs may’ve encased this structure to act as resonating chambers to make loud calls, or sheathes of keratin formed display structures atop it. Kritosaurus was first described in 1910 by the American paleontologist Barnum Brown (the same man who discovered the holotype specimen of Tyrannosaurus rex). Its name, meaning “separated lizard”, refers to how most of its facial bones were found disarticulated. The earliest reconstruction attempts failed to recognize its nasal arch. Confirmed fossils are known from the southwestern United States and possibly in Mexico. Canadian specimens once referred to it probably belong to the related Gryposaurus, which for a time was seen as the same genus as Kritosaurus.

Anchisaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Anchisauridae

Overview: Anchisaurus is a good example of a basal sauropodomorph, though it’s by no means the most “primitive” of the sauropodomorphs known. More derived sauropodomorph lineages, such as the true sauropods, had already emerged by its time. They were far larger, quadrupedal animals. In the case of Anchisaurus, however, it was much smaller and retained the bipedal posture of its earlier ancestors. Being smaller had its advantages. Anchisaurus likely wasn’t especially agile when compared to some other dinosaurs of its size, but it certainly was in comparison to its larger kin. Its arms being freed up also allowed for their use in defense and foraging. Basal sauropodomorphs of its ilk tended to have large hand claws, useful for manipulating branches, digging up roots and for swatting at an attacker. Food sources for this animal included horsetails, ferns, cycads and conifers. Like other basal sauropodomorphs, Anchisaurus had fairly simple teeth.

The holotype specimen of Anchisaurus, consisting of a partial skeleton, was accidentally unearthed in the mid-1850’s, in the state of Massachusetts. Later, a researcher by the name of Edward Hitchcock Jr. would study the bones. He would make a connection between these fossils and a set of fossilized tracks his own father had described in the area decades before. Hitchcock would at first describe it under the name Megadactylus. Another paleontologist, Othniel C. Marsh, pointed out that said name was already in use for another taxon, so its current generic name was officially chosen by him in 1885. Its name, meaning “near lizard”, refers to how Marsh saw it as a transitional form between later and earlier dinosaurs. Anchisaurus is today classified as a basal sauropodomorph in the clade Sauropodiformes. This made it more closely related to true sauropods than it was to dinosaurs like Plateosaurus, despite it retaining so many basal traits.

Nigersaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Rebbachisauridae > Rebbachisaurinae

Overview: Nigersaurus was a highly unusual sauropod dinosaur. For starters, it doesn’t fit with the general stereotype of sauropods being enormous, only having been maybe nine meters long and a few tons in weight. This actually isn’t too unusual, as even derived sauropods tended to vary widely in size. What was really unusual was its skull and jaws. The creature’s snout was wide and squared-off at the front, lined by a large number of tiny, tightly-packed teeth. Jaw shape, of course, tends to differ among animals in accordance with their diets and lifestyles, so a wide muzzle in and of itself wasn’t too strange. What sets Nigersaurus apart was how its jaws were modified as it evolved toward this form. Instead of the front of its snout widening, the sides of its jaws actually rotated forward. Its teeth, which could number in the hundreds, formed a straight cutting surface and appear to have constantly replaced themselves throughout its life. Overall, Nigersaurus had a very lightly constructed and fragile skull, even for a sauropod.

There is some debate as to why Nigersaurus evolved such unique jaws, but most see it as a highly specialized low-browser. Most sauropods were mid to high-browsing herbivores, using their long necks to feed from tall conifers and other trees, but Nigersaurus went in the opposite direction. In some studies, it has been found that Nigersaurus may’ve habitually held its head low towards the ground, though to what extent this is true is debated. Nigersaurus belonged to a family called the Rebbachisauridae, which mainly contained other odd, low-browsing and mostly small to medium-sized sauropods. These animals belonged to the larger superfamily Diplodocoidea, so they were distantly related to famous diplodocid sauropods like Diplodocus and Apatosaurus. Described in 1999, Nigersaurus takes its name from the nation of Niger, where it was found, in what is today a desert but was once a far more humid environment. It’s known from Niger’s Elrhaz Formation, so it lived during the Early Cretaceous, alongside dinosaurs like Ouranosaurus and Suchomimus.

Dilophosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Dilophosauridae

Overview: Dilophosaurus fossils were first discovered in the early 1940’s, on what is today Navajo land in the state of Arizona. They consisted of a few partial skeletons, which were first described in 1954 by paleontologist Samuel P. Welles. Welles would refer these specimens to the famous genus Megalosaurus, as a new species. More complete fossils would come to light in the 1960’s, some of which included the remnants of prominent head crests which revealed to Welles the actual truth – it was its own, separate genus. Welles formally established Dilophosaurus as such in 1970. The genus takes its name from Greek root words, together meaning “two-crested lizard”, inspired by the paired crests that ran along the length of its snout and over the eyes. All confirmed fossils of this dinosaur come from the Kayenta Formation, dated to the Early Jurassic. Some remains found in China were once referred to Dilophosaurus as an additional species, but they have since been re-classified as belonging to a separate genus called Sinosaurus. Dilophosaurus may’ve coexisted with the basal sauropodomorph Sarahsaurus and the small armored dinosaur Scutellosaurus, both of which were potential prey.

Contrary to some famous film portrayals, Dilophosaurus wasn’t a small theropod. Indeed, growing to be six or seven meters long, it was actually one of the largest land predators of the Early Jurassic, rivaled only by dinosaurs like Cryolophosaurus. Both animals, however, were lightly built, as was typical for such early theropods. Dilophosaurus was at first classified as a megalosauroid and later as a relative of either Coelophysis or Ceratosaurus. Currently, paleontologists treat it as a basal member of the clade Neotheropoda. It was “primitive”, but more derived than Coelophysis and its family. Dilophosaurus may belong to its own family, the Dilophosauridae, but there is some debate over what if any other dinosaurs really belonged to the clade. There is also no fossil evidence of either venom spitting or an extendable neck frill. This animal was easily capable of killing most prey with its jaws and claws alone and its sheer size, at least as an adult, would’ve warded off other dangerous predators. Its crests, the exact shape and full size of which have yet to be determined, were probably visual display structures.

Tarchia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Ankylosauridae > Ankylosaurinae

Overview: Like all ankylosaurs, Tarchia was a sturdily built, heavily armored animal. Its body was slung low to the ground, supported by four short, but strong legs. Ankylosaur armor was formed by an array of bony masses, called osteoderms, growing within its skin. Modern crocodiles and alligators have similar dermal armor on their backs today, though not to the same extent. Tarchia possessed armor over its whole back, along its sides, down its tail, across its neck and even on its head. Its osteoderms took different forms depending on where they were located, including oval-shaped masses across the back, spinier ones along the sides or closely packed, tile-shaped masses over the skull. Tarchia belonged to the ankylosaur family Ankylosauridae, which made it more closely related to the famous Ankylosaurus than it was to nodosaurid ankylosaurs like Hylaeosaurus or Edmontonia. Ankylosaurids usually possessed bony clubs on the ends of their tails, affixed to rows of fused tail vertebrae. This was its more active means of defense.

Tarchia needed extensive armor, considering it had to contend with powerful predatory dinosaurs like Tarbosaurus – a close relative of North America’s Tyrannosaurus. Other herbivores in the region included titanosaurian sauropods like Nemegtosaurus and a wide array of ceratopsians and ornithopods. The first known specimens of Tarchia were found in by Polish and Mongolian fossil hunters in the 1970’s, in what is now the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. Described in 1977, referred fossil material included parts of its braincase, which inspired its generic name, meaning “brainy one” in Mongolian. The creature’s brain itself wasn’t very large. These fossils were found within Mongolia’s Barun Goyot Formation, but more fossils would also be attributed to Tarchia from the geologically younger Nemegt Formation. Mongolia at this time was transitioning between an arid, desert-like environment and a somewhat wetter one, which is represented by the rock deposits within the formations themselves.

Kelumapusaura

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Saurolophinae > Austrokritosauria

Overview: Hadrosaurid dinosaurs, the true “duck-bills”, were once thought to be a lineage unique to the northern hemisphere, primarily to North America and Asia. Discoveries in recent decades have proven this to be a false assumption. Kelumapusaura is an example of a southern hadrosaur, its fossils being known from the Allen Formation of Argentina. It would’ve lived around seventy million years ago, possibly alongside other dinosaurs like Austroraptor and a myriad of other prehistoric animals. Described as a genus in 2022, Kelumapusaura takes part of its name from the language of the local Mapuche people, combined with Greek, meaning “red earth lizard”. This was chosen in reference to the reddish sediments from which its remains were excavated. Fossils of some other hadrosaurs are also known from the Allen Formation.

Kelumapusaura was a decently large hadrosaur, measuring between eight and nine meters long. It’s probably the largest hadrosaur known from the Allen Formation. Like other hadrosaurs, it would’ve spent most of its time down on all fours as it grazed for food, but it retained the ability to rear up on its hind limbs to feed from tree branches or survey its surroundings. Most southern hadrosaurid dinosaurs are classified within a clade called the Austrokritosauria, which appears to have been the case with Kelumapusaura. The name of this group invokes that of North America’s Kritosaurus. The austrokritosaurs, like Kritosaurus, often had high-arched nasal bones, which may’ve supported some kind of display structure in life, or possibly air sacs. Austrokritosaurs may’ve been close relatives of Kritosaurus itself, which belonged to the hadrosaur tribe Kritosaurini.

Guanlong

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Proceratosauridae

Overview: By the end of the Cretaceous, the tyrannosaurs had become the dominant land predators of the northern hemisphere, mainly in Asia and North America. They had also obtained considerable size, with Tyrannosaurus itself being among the largest known theropods. However, the tyrannosaur lineage had humble beginnings. They first appear in the fossil record during the Middle Jurassic. Guanlong itself lived towards the start of the Late Jurassic and, like most of its early tyrannosaur relatives, it wasn’t overly large. In terms of length, Guanlong was about three or four meters long at most and lightly built, quite unlike the tyrannosaur bruisers that would evolve some fifty to sixty million years later. Scientists usually classify Guanlong within a family known as the Proceratosauridae, which contained some of the most basal and earliest known members of the tyrannosauroid superfamily. Despite their name, they weren’t close relatives of Ceratosaurus.

Proceratosaurids shared a few features in common that set them apart from their later relatives, in addition to their (typically) smaller size. The earliest tyrannosaurs had rather long arms and retained three distinct, clawed digits on each hand. Fragile, bony head crests were also common to the proceratosaurids, growing along their snouts. Guanlong itself possessed such a crest, which took on a rounded form and was probably used for visual display. The creature’s name actually refers to this feature, being derived from the Mandarin Chinese words for “crown” and “dragon”. Guanlong fossils are known from China’s Shishugou Formation, located in what is now the western territory of Xinjiang. Like other Jurassic tyrannosaurs, Guanlong lived in the shadow of much larger predators. In its case, this was likely the allosauroid Sinraptor or the more basal Monolophosaurus. Guanlong probably occupied a niche pursuing smaller prey than either dinosaur.

Yinlong

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Chaoyangsauridae

Overview: Long before the enormous Triceratops roamed North America in the Late Cretaceous, its tiny ancestors did the same in Asia. Yinlong, while perhaps not a direct ancestor of Triceratops and its kin, is a prime example of an early ceratopsian dinosaur. Ceratopsians first appear in the fossil record only a few million years prior to Yinlong, near the start of the Late Jurassic. At that time, most were only around a meter long. They were bipeds, with quadrupedal locomotion only appearing among the ceratopsians in the Late Cretaceous. Later quadrupedal ceratopsians, such as Triceratops, often had gigantic heads sporting prominent bony frills, spikes and horns. Yinlong had the beginnings of a frill, taking the form of a ridge of bone along the back of its head, but had a tiny skull and entirely lacked horns. Both early and later ceratopsians possessed prominent beaks. Lacking any form of armor or actual horns, the only real defense this dinosaur possessed was said beak.

Phylogenetic studies usually classify Yinlong as a member of the family Chaoyangsauridae, named for the genus Chaoyangsaurus. Chaoyangsaurids are only known from China, with ceratopsians most likely having first evolved in central or eastern Asia. They would remain very successful in the region, though they would also migrate into North America and probably to Europe, though they don’t appear to have found much success in the southern hemisphere. Yinlong was probably a mostly or entirely herbivorous animal, though insects may’ve made up part of its diet. It retained teeth towards the front of its jaws, which the most derived ceratopsian dinosaurs lacked. Remains are known from the Shishugou Formation, in the Xinjiang region of western China. Described as a new genus in 2006, the generic name of Yinlong, meaning “hidden dragon” in Mandarin, refers to it having been discovered near to where the movie Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was filmed.

Patagosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Cetiosauridae

Overview: True sauropods evolved towards the end of the Late Triassic, but it was during the latter part of the Early Jurassic that they began to truly flourish and diversify. One major clade to evolve in this time was the Eusauropoda, from which most of the popularly known sauropods evolved from; dinosaurs like Diplodocus, Brachiosaurus and the titanosaurs. Patagosaurus was a basal or “primitive” member of the eusauropod lineage. Specifically, it’s usually classified within the family Cetiosauridae. Cetiosaurids were more basal than some other eusauropod families, such as the mamenchisaurids. As a member, Patagosaurus was of course a close relative of Cetiosaurus itself, though it’s debated as to which other basal eusauropods truly belonged to the family. Both had a lot in common, though Patagosaurus lived in Argentina, while Cetiosaurus roamed England.

Cetiosaurids were mostly medium-sized sauropods. Patagosaurus grew to be about fifteen meters long and a handful of tons in weight. While this is considerably smaller than some other sauropods that evolved later, it was still one of the largest land animals of its time. Patagosaurus probably fed upon medium to high-level vegetation, with conifers making up a fair bit of its diet. It itself may’ve been a food source for theropods like Asfaltovenator and Piatnitzkysaurus. All three genera are based on fossils unearthed from Argentina’s Cañadón Asfalto Formation. While an obscure genus to the public at large, Patagosaurus is decently well known as far as fossils go. Up to a dozen or more partial specimens have been found, representing different growth stages. Patagosaurus was described in 1979 by the renowned José F. Bonaparte, its name referring to the region of Patagonia.

Falcarius

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Therizinosauria

Overview: Attributing one diet or lifestyle to broad groups of dinosaurs (or any animal) will lead to inaccurate assumptions. Theropods, which included dinosaurs like Megalosaurus, Allosaurus and Tyrannosaurus, were mostly carnivorous when we exclude modern birds. However, some non-avian theropods occupied quite different niches. Some were omnivores or even herbivorous, as we can see with Falcarius. Falcarius belonged to the clade Therizinosauria, which contained some of the most bizarre theropods known to science. They’re known for their unusual leg and hip bones, semi-upright posture, potbellied profiles, elongated necks and enormous arms. Their hands usually sported long claws. Some, such as Therizinosaurus itself, were quite enormous, but Falcarius was considerably smaller, as well as much more “primitive” within the Therizinosauria. Even among the more derived therizinosaurs, there was a lot of variation in body size.

Falcarius possessed a number of the traits for which the therizinosaurs are famed, though to a less exaggerated degree. Among the confirmed therizinosaurs, it’s usually classified as the most basal member of the clade, falling outside both the therizinosauroid superfamily (which included genera like Beipiaosaurus) and the family Therizinosauridae (to which Therizinosaurus belonged). Falcarius was more slenderly built and held its body more horizontally. The latter trait was the norm for most theropods, so it retained something its later relatives would evolve away from. Even as a basal therizinosaur, Falcarius had already evolved a herbivorous diet, though its ancestors would’ve been carnivores. Falcarius lived during the Early Cretaceous and is known from the lower levels of the Cedar Mountain Formation, in what is now Utah. While not a predator itself, other local theropods certainly were, most notably Utahraptor – the largest known dromaeosaurid dinosaur.

Gargoyleosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae (?)

Overview: With a modest understanding of dinosaurs, one might be tempted to see the stegosaurs (Stegosaurus, Kentrosaurus, etc.) as a strictly Jurassic group of herbivores and the Ankylosaurs (Ankylosaurus, Euoplocephalus, etc.) as a Cretaceous lineage. In reality, there is a fair bit of temporal overlap. The former would persist for a while into the Early Cretaceous, while the ankylosaurs actually first appear in the fossil record during the Middle to Late Jurassic. Taxa in both groups occasionally coexisted. Gargoyleosaurus is a good example of this. Fossils of the animal are known from the famous Morrison Formation of North America, which also contains the remains of the famous Stegosaurus. The two dinosaurs shared the same environment, likely having different ecological roles or niches. Gargoyleosaurus probably fed entirely on low-level plant life.

While the stegosaurs usually had upward-standing plates along their backs and spiked tails, the armor on ankylosaurs like Gargoyleosaurus was quite different. This dinosaur had rows of bony scutes running along its back, sides, tail and neck. It was well protected from all but the largest of theropods. Unfortunately for Gargoyleosaurus, it lived among a variety of large theropods, namely taxa like Ceratosaurus, Torvosaurus and Allosaurus. Gargoyleosaurus lacked a club on the end of its tail, which could imply it was a nodosaurid ankylosaur – ankylosaurids usually had such clubs. However, it could’ve been an early member of the Ankylosauridae, as we can assume the most basal of them didn’t have such a trait, which fossil evidence does support. Gargoyleosaurus was formally named as a genus in 1998, its generic name referring to the gargoyle like appearance of its holotype fossil.

Spectrovenator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Ceratosauria > Neoceratosauria > Abelisauroidea > Abelisauridae

Overview: Described by paleontologists in 2020, the generic name of Spectrovenator is taken from Latin, intended to mean “ghost hunter”. Spectrovenator was a carnivore and presumed predator, so the name is fitting in that respect, but it was mainly chosen due to the circumstances in which its holotype specimen was found. It was buried beneath the remains of a much larger dinosaur, namely a titanosaurian sauropod, so it was “hidden” and could’ve been easily missed. The name can also be seen in a less literal way, referring to how Spectrovenator fills in a gap within the evolutionary history of its close relatives. Known fossils of the animal include its skull, neck, parts of the spine, pelvis, legs and a portion of the tail. Its upper torso and arms have yet to be found or described in detail. Spectrovenator was overall a remarkable and important find. All known fossils originate from Argentina’s Quiricó Formation.

Researchers classify Spectrovenator within the family Abelisauridae – a part of the larger clade Ceratosauria. Confirmed abelisaurid fossils first appear in the Early Cretaceous, Spectrovenator being an example of such an early and basal member. There are some fossils from the Jurassic that possibly belong to the Abelisauridae, specifically those of a genus called Eoabelisaurus, though it’s more often classified nowadays outside the family in the larger abelisauroid superfamily. Most of the better known abelisaurids lived in the Late Cretaceous, when they were notably successful in the southern hemisphere. They often had tiny arms, deep snouts and grew to be fairly large. In the case of Spectrovenator, however, it was notably small, at between two and three meters long. Its arms are unknown, but they may’ve been longer than those of its later relatives. The skull was longer and less deep than those of some more derived abelisaurids like Carnotaurus.

Kosmoceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Chasmosaurinae

Overview: The official description of Kosmoceratops as a new genus was published in 2010, based on a set of fossil remains unearthed in the state of Utah. Its generic name is derived from Greek, translated as “ornate horned face”. Ceratopsids like Kosmoceratops all possessed “ornate” faces, or more accurately, skulls overall. Said skull was enormous, bearing a long, beaked snout. The nasal horn was low, blade-like and oddly rectangular, as opposed to the longer and pointed horns usually seen on the snouts of its relatives. Kosmoceratops had much longer brow horns, which curved out towards the sides. The animal’s most distinctive feature was its frill, the top of which was curled forward and fringed by pointed hornlets. As with most ceratopsids, this frill was probably used for visual display purposes, but its horns may’ve played an additional defensive role. Ceratopsids differ little in their overall anatomy, but their cranial ornamentation helps to distinguish them.

Kosmoceratops belonged to the ceratopsid subfamily Chasmosaurinae, making it a somewhat close relative of Triceratops. It was more basal than Triceratops, however, being closer to genera like Pentaceratops and Spiclypeus. All of these animals were generally low-browsing herbivores, using their beaks to snap branches and snip stems, while tightly-packed shearing teeth lined the back of the jaws, well suited for processing even tougher vegetation. Some ceratopsids are known to have lived in groups, which was possibly the case with Kosmoceratops. Known fossils of this taxon include most of the skull, its ribcage, the spine, its pelvis and some leg bones. All were found within Utah’s Kaiparowits Formation, dated to the Late Cretaceous. It coexisted with other herbivores like Parasaurolophus and Nasutoceratops, as well as the carnivorous Teratophoneus (a tyrannosaurid). Deinosuchus, a large crocodilian or close kin to crocodilians, was also present.

Hadrosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae

Overview: The vast majority of dinosaur fossils described from the United States come from the western part of the country. Exposed rock layers dated to the Mesozoic Era are more common there, unlike in the east, where erosion in some areas has left only pre-Mesozoic rocks exposed and sediment buildup lower down has covered them. Still, a number of dinosaurs have been found and described from the east, including some of the first ever to be named in North America. One of these dinosaurs was Hadrosaurus, described in 1858 by the renowned paleontologist Joseph M. Leidy. The first remains of the animal were found a couple decades earlier in New Jersey, quite on accident by a local man excavating for marlstone. More fossils would later be recovered at this same site, making Hadrosaurus one of the more completely known dinosaurs at the time.

Hadrosaurus would prove a significant discovery. Its limb bones showed it was capable of walking on its hind limbs, which had implications for earlier restorations of dinosaurs like Iguanodon (most famously depicted previously at Crystal Palace Park in London), which had been interpreted as entirely quadrupedal animals. The actual situation with Hadrosaurus was a bit more complex, as it belonged to a lineage that could actually walk in both fashions. Hadrosaurus would go on to become the namesake of both the family Hadrosauridae and the superfamily Hadrosauroidea – the clades containing the famous “duck-billed” dinosaurs. Among the hadrosaurids, Hadrosaurus itself is usually treated as a basal member. It was average-sized, at about eight meters long. Like all of its kin, it possessed both a beak and a large number of teeth lining the back of its jaws.

Khaan

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Oviraptorosauria > Caenagnathoidea > Oviraptoridae > Heyuanniinae

Overview: Khaan takes its generic name from the Mongolian word for “lord” or “ruler”, the same title held by the infamous Genghis Khan. The name, coined in 2001, was chosen to honor Mongolia and its history. Khaan itself wasn’t an especially imposing or regal dinosaur by any means. It grew to be only one or two meters long and was, generally, lightly built. All known fossils of the animal come from the rock layers of Mongolia’s Djadochta Formation, so Khaan would’ve lived about seventy-five million years ago. Today, the Djadochta is exposed in the form of dramatic, reddish cliffs in the Gobi Desert. According to evidence, these rocks preserve what was once a somewhat similar environment, with Khaan and other Djadochta dinosaurs having inhabited a landscape of sand dunes with little water. Contemporaries included Velociraptor and Protoceratops.

The overall anatomy of Khaan reveals it to have been a member of the family Oviraptoridae, so it was a close relative of the famous Oviraptor, fossils of which are also known from the Djadochta. Oviraptorids belonged to a larger clade known as the Oviraptorosauria, which were classified somewhat close to the lineage that gave rise to birds. They were superficially very birdlike animals, evidence suggesting they possessed extensive feather coverage. Often, oviraptorid skeletons are found brooding over their own nests, their arms outstretched like the wings of birds to insulate and keep their eggs warm. Khaan and Oviraptor are distinguished by a few detailed traits. For the most part, Khaan retained more “primitive” traits than those of Oviraptor. Oviraptorids are usually seen as omnivores, having possessed short, toothless beaks that were well suited to such a diet.

Austroposeidon

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes > Somphospondyli > Titanosauria > Lithostrotia

Overview: Growing to be up to twenty-five meters long and weighing a few dozen tons, this genus is a contender for the largest known Brazilian dinosaur. Fossils of the animal originate from rocks belonging to the Presidente Prudente Formation, layers of which are today exposed in the south of Brazil. The first of these bones were found in the 1950’s, though Austroposeidon wouldn’t be fully described and properly named until 2016. Its generic name means “southern Poseidon” or “Poseidon of the south”, referring to it originating in the southern hemisphere, but also to the Greek sea deity Poseidon. Poseidon was thought to be the origin of earthquakes, so the name is often invoked for large sauropod genera. North America’s Sauroposeidon is one such example.

Austroposeidon was a member of the famous titanosaurian lineage of sauropods, making it related to dinosaurs like Paralititan and Argentinosaurus. It belonged to the clade Lithostrotia, so it was somewhat derived as far as titanosaurs go. Some believe it may’ve belonged to the Lognkosauria, which made Argentinosaurus a potential close relative, but this is debated. As large as this dinosaur was, some lognkosaurs, such as Argentinosaurus itself, grew to even greater proportions. Fully grown Austroposeidon were probably safe from most predators, though the young, weak and elderly would’ve been vulnerable to attacks from large theropods. Most of the traits that set this dinosaur apart from other titanosaurs could be seen on its vertebrae.

Kileskus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Proceratosauridae

Overview: Kileskus is one of the oldest known tyrannosaurs from the fossil record, rivaled only by the genus Proceratosaurus, from what is now England. Kileskus itself lived in what is today central Russia, its fossils having been found in the region of Krasnoyarsk, in Siberia. Said fossils came from the Itat Formation, meaning Kileskus would’ve lived around one hundred and sixty-six million years ago. Both it and Proceratosaurus belonged to the family Proceratosauridae, which is generally seen as the most basal lineage within the tyrannosauroid superfamily. During the Middle Jurassic, tyrannosaurs were only minor predators, usually going after smaller prey. They themselves may’ve been preyed on by larger theropods, mainly megalosaurids or early allosaurs. Kileskus is currently the only dinosaur described from the Itat, though fossils of other dinosaurs have been found there. Described in 2010, its scientific full name, Kileskus aristotocus, translates as “lizard of noble origin”, partly derived from the local Khakas language.

Paleontologists estimate Kileskus to have been about four or so meters long, so it was a far cry from the behemoths that would later emerge from its superfamily. This was average for a member of the Proceratosauridae. Kileskus is primarily known from bits of its skull and some bones from the hands and feet. What we know about other proceratosaurids can help us to reconstruct its life appearance. These dinosaurs tended to have long arms, unlike the most derived tyrannosaurs, as well as three clawed digits. Kileskus likely had a bony crest over its snout, as we can see on both Proceratosaurus and Guanlong. We have direct fossil evidence that these early tyrannosaurs had simple proto-feathers over most of their bodies, but later tyrannosaurs may’ve lost them due to obtaining such huge sizes. The proceratosaurid Yutyrannus, from the Early Cretaceous of China, was decently large for its time and still had proto-feathers, however.

Oryctodromeus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Thescelosauridae > Orodrominae

Overview: Growing to be about two meters long, Oryctodromeus wasn’t a large dinosaur by any means, or exciting from a first glance. It was a bipedal herbivore that probably subsisted mainly on low-level shrubbery and ferns. What is unique about it was its potential lifestyle. The holotype of Oryctodromeus is one of the first known examples of evidence for burrowing behavior among the Dinosauria. Skeletal remains of the animal were actually found within their burrows, closely packed together and smothered with infilled sediments. The anatomy of the bones themselves also supports such a lifestyle. Its forelimbs and shoulders were modified to allow for prolonged digging, in a somewhat similar fashion to that of some modern burrowing animals.

Living in burrows would’ve granted a few key advantages to Oryctodromeus. It gave it a place to flee from larger predators and a place to more safely raise its young. As with other dinosaurs, it would’ve laid clutches of eggs, so multiple hatchlings probably lived together with their parents inside these burrows. We can assume, however, that some predators may’ve adapted in turn to this behavior, as there are some predators in our own time that specialize in pursuing burrowers. Described in 2007, the generic name of Oryctodromeus means “digging runner”, which refers to both its lifestyle and to its smaller, more agile form. The genus belonged to a family of mainly small-bodied ornithischians called the Thescelosauridae, Orodromeus being a close relative.

Unenlagia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Dromaeosauridae (?) > Unenlagiinae

Overview: Unenlagia was long seen as a somewhat mysterious dinosaur. Fossils of the animal were first described in 1997, having been found in Argentina’s Portezuelo Formation, dated to the Late Cretaceous. Recovered bones included the pelvis, some leg bones, bits of vertebrae, ribs and part of the shoulder. All of these remains shared traits in common with birds, so Unenlagia was seen by its describers as one of the non-avian dinosaurs most closely related to proper birds. This idea is reflected by its generic name, meaning “half-bird” in the local Mapuche language of the region. In some later studies, Unenlagia was associated with the “raptor” family Dromaeosauridae, so for a time, many reconstructions depicted it as a creature similar in appearance to dinosaurs such as Deinonychus or Velociraptor, but this has since been proven inaccurate.

Currently, paleontologists classify Unenlagia within a subfamily called the Unenlagiinae. Other taxa probably belonging to the group includes Austroraptor and Buitreraptor. Most are known from the southern hemisphere, but a few potential northern members are also known. Unenlagiines are often classified as an early diverging subfamily within the aforementioned Dromaeosauridae, but in some studies, they are seen as relatives of dromaeosaurs, but not as true members of the family. If the latter is true, then they are a subfamily within the proposed family Unenlagiidae (which may also contain dinosaurs like Halszkaraptor, in their own subfamily). Either way, unenlagiines are set apart by a few unique traits. They tended to have long, slender jaws, lightly built bodies and shorter arms. Traditional dromaeosaur traits like enlarged toe claws were also present on these animals.

Tratayenia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea (?) > Megaraptora > Megaraptoridae

Overview: Tratayenia is known from partial skeletal remains, mainly comprised of vertebrae and some other bones, but enough features are readily observable to determine what kind of dinosaur it was in life. Tratayenia was probably a member of the family Megaraptoridae, which is itself a part of the larger clade Megaraptora. Megaraptorans are a mysterious group of theropods, with many studies over the years placing them in widely different lineages, largely due to them having a mix of derived and basal theropod traits. In years prior, megaraptorans were classified as allosaurs, more derived than Allosaurus itself and closely related to the carcharodontosaur Neovenator. The most recent studies, however, have instead classified megaraptorans within the Coelurosauria, so they were likely closer to birds and possibly related in some way to the tyrannosaurs.

Length estimates for Tratayenia put it at eight or so meters long, which made it one of the larger known megaraptorans and a decently large theropod overall. Notably, megaraptorans were often a lot more lightly built than other theropods of comparable lengths, which was likely the case with Tratayenia itself. This implies they were somewhat more agile. Megaraptorans tended to have long, narrow jaws, but quite enormous arms, often equipped with enlarged, curving claws. Unlike some other theropods, such as Tyrannosaurus, Tratayenia and its kin mainly relied upon their arms to capture their prey. Described in 2018, Tratayenia takes its name from the fossil site of Tratayén, a part of Argentina’s Bajo de la Carpa Formation, where it was originally found. It was probably one of the top predators of its local environment, possibly competing with some abelisaurids.

Huayangosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Stegosauria > Huayangosauridae

Overview: Back in the late 1970’s, in what is now the Chinese province of Sichuan, remains of a few armored dinosaurs were discovered. Chinese researchers would publish a description of the animal in 1982, naming it Huayangosaurus, deriving its name from the Mandarin term “Huayang”, which can historically be applied as a name for the region of Sichuan. It was found in some of the deeper layers of the Shaximiao Formation, dated to the Middle Jurassic. The discovery proved quite significant, as Huayangosaurus was at that time one of the oldest known members of the clade Stegosauria, to which the famous Stegosaurus belonged. In many respects, the two dinosaurs were very similar. Both possessed twin rows of enlarged osteoderms growing along their backs and long spines on the end of the tail. They walked on all fours and are assumed to have largely lived on low-level plant life. Huayangosaurus, however, was smaller than Stegosaurus.

Length estimates for Huayangosaurus put it at maybe four meters long at most, with it being much lighter than Stegosaurus as well. These weren’t the only differences. Huayangosaurus had far more robust forelimbs, comparatively, than its famous cousin, as well as a proportionately larger skull. Even more notable, Huayangosaurus retained teeth towards the front of its mouth, which among later stegosaurs, were absent (though they retained teeth farther back in the mouth). Most agree it was, fitting for its age, one of the most basal of the known stegosaurs, probably belonging to a family separate from that of Stegosaurus. Said family is referred to as the Huayangosauridae and may contain other notable Chinese stegosaurs like Chungkingosaurus. Huayangosaurus had rather narrow dorsal plates and possibly a set of long spikes on the shoulders. These spines were likely used to ward off predators, such as Gasosaurus or the larger Yangchuanosaurus.

Serikornis

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Anchiornithidae

Overview: The casual modern observer would probably mistake Serikornis for a bird at first sight. It certainly shared a lot in common with one, with direct fossil evidence revealing that its body was covered in various types of feathers. Key differences, however, included its long and bony tail, the teeth lining its jaws, lack of a beak and distinct clawed digits on each of its hands. Phylogenetically, Serikornis was closely related to modern birds, belonging to the clade Paraves, which also contains the dromaeosaurid “raptor” dinosaurs and the troodontid family. Serikornis, usually, is classified as a member of the family Anchiornithidae. Other notable anchiornithids includes Aurornis, Xiaotingia, Eosinopteryx and Anchiornis, the family’s namesake. This particular family saw its greatest success in the Late Jurassic, primarily in what is now the northeast of China.

Serikornis is based on some decently preserved remains. Its holotype specimen was unearthed from the rocks of the Tiaojishan Formation, in China’s Liaoning Province. This dates the creature to around one hundred and sixty million years ago, or towards the start of the Late Jurassic. Fossilized remains from the Tiaojishan are often very well preserved, with many small theropods being found with feather impressions around the body. This was the case with Serikornis, showing it had long wing feathers on the arms and simpler, filamentous feathers over most of its body. Fluffy feathers were particularly notable on the legs, covering much of their length. This invokes the image of modern Silkie chickens, which inspired the creature’s generic name, meaning “silk bird”. Serikornis likely fed upon insects and small reptiles. Some believe it is actually the same genus as Anchiornis.

Rhabdodon

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Rhabdodontomorpha > Rhabdodontoidea > Rhabdodontidae

Overview: Rhabdodon is the namesake of the family Rhabdodontidae, as well as to a larger clade known as the Rhabdodontomorpha. These dinosaurs were iguanodontian ornithopods, so they were relatives of the famous Iguanodon, though they were a lot more “primitive” in comparison, though most confirmed rhabdodontids lived towards the end of the Cretaceous. They likely split off from other iguanodonts much earlier. Most of the rhabdodontids were small to medium-sized ornithopods, probably subsisting on ground-level vegetation. They often had simple, yet sturdy teeth and deep jaws. Unlike more derived iguanodonts, Rhabdodon and its kin appear to have been strictly bipedal animals, their arms being quite short, though they could probably crouch to graze. Rhabdodontids were at their most successful in Europe during the Late Cretaceous.

The first known fossils of Rhabdodon were found in the 1840’s, when a team of workers in France were excavating what would later be a railroad tunnel. Scientists at first associated the find with the genus Iguanodon, but it would soon become clear the animals were fairly different. In 1869, a formal description of Rhabdodon as its own genus was published. The name of the creature means “fluted tooth”, referring to a prominent grove than ran along its teeth. Similar features can be seen on some of its rhabdodontid relatives. Potential kin included genera like Mochlodon and Zalmoxes, though the status of the latter has recently been called into question (one species of Zalmoxes has since been reclassified as a new ceratopsian genus, unrelated to Rhabdodon). Fossils attributed to Rhabdodon are mainly known from geological formations in France and Spain.

Acrocanthosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Carnosauria > Allosauroidea > Carcharodontosauria > Carcharodontosauridae

Overview: In the 1940’s, two partial skeletons belonging to a large theropod were unearthed in the state of Oklahoma. Recovered fossils included limb bones, parts of the skull, bits of pelvis, ribs and a series of vertebrae. The latter bones stood out due to their rather tall and fairly wide neural spines, which would later inspire the creature’s generic name – Acrocanthosaurus, the “high-spined lizard”. The holotype material came from Oklahoma’s Antlers Formation, so the fossils have been dated to the Early Cretaceous. Other similarly-aged geological formations in the United States, such as the Twin Mountains Formation and Cloverly Formation, have also yielded the fossilized remains of Acrocanthosaurus. It apparently had a wide range over North America during its heyday. Isolated teeth from as far east as Maryland could possibly belong to Acrocanthosaurus, originating from the Arundel Formation, though we can’t be certain if this is the case. In some older studies, Acrocanthosaurus was associated with the megalosaurids or even the spinosaurids, but in most modern studies, it’s classified as a basal member of the Carcharodontosauridae, making it an allosauroid theropod close to Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus.

Acrocanthosaurus was a massive theropod, with some specimens measuring up to eleven or more meters long and weighing multiple tons. Indeed, it’s often cited as the largest theropod known from North America prior to the appearance of Tyrannosaurus. Acrocanthosaurus was likely the top predator in North America at that time, going after juvenile sauropods, armored ankylosaurs and iguanodonts. It also coexisted with many smaller theropods, notably the dromaeosaurid genus Deinonychus. Its neural spines probably supported a ridge of muscle or fat along its back, possibly to store energy or to make it appear even larger than it already was. Its jaws were lined with blade-like teeth, while its arms were quite powerful despite their shorter length. Three clawed digits were sported by each hand. Allosauroid mega-theropods like Acrocanthosaurus were the top predators in most parts of the world during the Early Cretaceous and into the first half of the Late Cretaceous. Eventually, as dinosaurs like Acrocanthosaurus died out, the tyrannosaurs would begin to grow larger and fill in these now vacant niches (at least in the northern hemisphere). So far, Acrocanthosaurus is the only confirmed carcharodontosaurid known from North America.

Ingentia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda (?) > Lessemsauridae

Overview: Sauropodomorphs first appear in the fossil record in the Late Triassic, with most of the earliest members of the group being small, lightly built, bipedal and probably omnivorous (evolving from carnivorous dinosaur ancestors). However, prior to the end of the period, they would begin to diversify quite a bit. We can see this with the genus Ingentia. Unlike its earlier relatives, it was a quadrupedal, herbivorous and decently large animal. Its size didn’t quite reach that of some later sauropodomorphs from the Jurassic, but during its time, Ingentia and its closest relatives were some of the largest land animals the world had yet seen up until that point. Fully grown adults were likely safe from all but the largest of predators, which in that time, usually weren’t theropod dinosaurs. Theropods were still mostly smaller and lightly-built animals, while terrestrial crocodile relatives, namely the “rauisuchids”, dominated that top predator role in most regions. Ingentia itself would’ve subsisted on plants like conifers and cycads.

In order to support its great bulk, Ingentia had to have strong limbs, which fossil evidence suggests it certainly had. These limbs, however, weren’t the highly specialized, pillar-like limbs seen on some of its more derived relatives. For the most part, they retained some of their more “primitive” shape, but in a slightly altered form, still well suited for bearing its body weight. Evolving columnar legs would allow later sauropodomorphs to reach such stupendous sizes. Such dinosaurs belonged to the Sauropoda, which some studies suggest Ingentia also may’ve belonged to, representing one of the earliest examples of a true sauropod. It belonged to the family Lessemsauridae, alongside other dinosaurs like Lessemsaurus, Antetonitrus and Ledumahadi. Other studies, however, have placed the Lessemsauridae just outside the Sauropoda, as a sister clade – related, but not truly belonging to it. Described in 2018, the full scientific name of this dinosaur, Ingentia prima, means “first huge one”, referring to its size at a time when that was still rare for dinosaurs.

Sinoceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsidae > Centrosaurinae

Overview: Ceratopsian dinosaurs first evolved at some point in the Jurassic, starting out as mainly tiny, bipedal herbivores. Remains of such creatures are known from Asia, suggesting ceratopsians trace their roots to the continent. The largest and most derived of the ceratopsians, known from the Late Cretaceous, were the members of the family Ceratopsidae. Despite ceratopsians as a whole originating from Asia and having a lot of success there, Asian ceratopsids specifically were once almost entirely unheard of. Currently, only Sinoceratops has been described from Asia, its fossils having been described from the Shandong Province in eastern China. Paleontologists fully described and named the animal in 2010, giving it the name “Chinese horned face”, in honor of its country of origin. Its discovery proved that ceratopsids, while perhaps rarer there than in North America, were still present in Asia towards the end of the Cretaceous. Its fossils are known from the Hongtuya Formation, so it may’ve coexisted with Shantungosaurus or Zhuchengtyrannus.

Sinoceratops is mainly based on skull material. Pieces recovered include part of its face and around the eye, the base of a nasal horn and a fair bit of the frill that projected from the back of the head. It appears to have had a fairly deep snout in life and, while its full shape is unknown, probably a fairly large nasal horn. Sinoceratops lacked horns over the eyes, though it may’ve had low ridges on the same spot. The frill was relatively short and rounded in profile, bearing two large openings. In life, these openings were covered by tissue and skin (unlike in some media portrayals of the genus). All along the rim of the frill were prominent, forward-curving hornlets. These features were mainly for visual display, though the horn likely doubled as a defensive weapon. Longer nasal horns and deeper snouts are traits associated with the ceratopsid subfamily Centrosaurinae. Sinoceratops is usually considered to have been a basal member of this clade. In other words, Sinoceratops was a lot more closely related to dinosaurs like Styracosaurus than it was to the famous Triceratops (a chasmosaurine ceratopsid).

Zanabazar

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Troodontidae > Troodontinae

Overview: Zanabazar was officially described as a genus in 2009, based on fossil material found in the Nemegt Formation of Mongolia. Its generic name was chosen to honor the historical Zanabazar – a Mongolian Buddhist religious authority from the seventeenth century. Some other Mongolian dinosaurs are named after Buddhist figures or traditions, in recognition of its great influence over the country’s history (mainly transmitted from Tibet). Studies of the Nemegt Formation date it to around seventy million years ago, seeming to preserve a relatively humid region crossed by rivers and marshlands. Drier conditions were also present, however, with the formations directly beneath the Nemegt (like the Djadochta Formation) preserving desert-like environments. There is some debate over how distinct each of these formations are, with it being suggested that there was overlap with regards to which dinosaurs lived there at different times.

With a length of two or three meters, Zanabazar wasn’t a very large dinosaur, though it was in the normal size range for its family – the Troodontidae. Troodontids were a highly birdlike group that first appears in the fossil record back in the Late Jurassic, but they saw their greatest success in the Late Cretaceous, as we can see with Zanabazar itself. Scientists place the troodontids close to modern birds, being members of the clade Paraves, which also made them relatives of the famed Dromaeosauridae, or the “raptor” family. Like the “raptors”, Zanabazar and its kin had enlarged talons on the second toe of each foot, probably used to hook into and pin down small prey. The whole of the Paraves were extensively feathered, likely with advanced, veined feathers. Other notable traits seen on troodontids were their enormous eyes and proportionately large brains, so it’s possible they had both keen senses and relatively advanced social behaviors.

Leaellynasaura

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Elasmaria

Overview: One of the most fossil-riche sites in Australia is “Dinosaur Cove”, located near the coast of southern Victoria. Rocks from the site are dated to the Early Cretaceous and contain fossils of a myriad of different dinosaurs and other Mesozoic animals. Many of these fossils are those of small ornithopods, some of which are attributed to the genus Leaellynasaura. The creature was officially described and named back in 1989 by the paleontologists Thomas H. Rich and Patricia A. Vickers-Rich – a married couple best known for their work at Dinosaur Cove. Leaellynasaura was named after their own daughter, Leaellyn, with another more obscure dinosaur called Timimus being named after their son Timothy. The latter genus was also found at Dinosaur Cove and probably belongs to some kind of coelurosaur, though its exact status is debated. Leaellynasaura is known from more, but still fragmentary fossils. Both come from Australia’s Eumeralla Formation, so they had to contend with decently large megaraptoran or allosauroid predators.

The holotype specimen of Leaellynasaura consisted of portions of the skull, but some other skeletal remains found at Dinosaur Cove probably belong to it, though some studies have pointed out we can’t be certain if they’re from the same animal or not. Either way, it was clearly not a very large dinosaur. Length estimates put it at maybe two meters long and light in weight. The creature was a bipedal, low-browsing herbivore with a short, pointed snout. If the known skeletal material does belong to Leaellynasaura, then it had a remarkably long tail for an ornithopod of its size. The southern part of Australia was, in its time, much farther south. Leaellynasaura had to contend with prolonged periods of cold and darkness, even though the world overall was warmer than now. Its tail may’ve been an adaptation for these conditions, used to wrap around itself or its young. The holotype’s eyes were large, which implies decent night vision, though it may not have been fully grown. Leaellynasaura likely belonged to the clade Elasmaria, meaning it belonged to a lineage of mostly small to medium-sized iguanodonts from the southern hemisphere.

Alpkarakush

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Carnosauria > Allosauroidea > Metriacanthosauridae > Metriacanthosaurinae

Overview: Alpkarakush was probably the top predator of its own local region, some one hundred and sixty-five million years ago. Growing to be eight or so meters long and weighing up to a few tons, it was decently large and probably powerful enough to take on some larger herbivores and those with armor. Alpkarakush fossils are known from the Balabansai Formation, in what is now the nation of Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia. It’s one of the very few dinosaurs described from the Balabansai, though remains of sauropods and early stegosaurs show it lived among a variety of different taxa. Both types of animals were potential sources of prey. Described in 2024, Alpkarakush takes its generic name from that of a giant bird, most famously appearing in the Epic of Manas – an epic poem kept and shared among the Kyrgyz people for at least the past millennia. While a theropod, Alpkarakush itself wasn’t particularly closely related to actual birds.

Some of the fossils described so far from Alpkarakush include its pelvis, most of the legs, some finger bones, vertebrae, ribs and parts of the skull. Much of its torso and arms have yet to be described and the tail, so far, is entirely missing. Still, we have enough to get an idea as to how it would’ve appeared in life, as well as to how it should be classified. Alpkarakush was an allosauroid theropod belonging to the family Metriacanthosauridae. Metriacanthosaurids were a group of apex predators, mainly from Asia and Europe, which saw their peak of success during the Middle to Late Jurassic. They often had short, but very deep snouts, as we can see with Alpkarakush itself. Its arms were short, but probably fairly strong, bearing three digits on each hand. Metriacanthosaurids often had low crests of bone running along their snouts and over their eyes, which were particularly prominent on Alpkarakush, giving it a very distinct appearance.

Diabloceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Centrosaurinae

Overview: Diabloceratops was a medium-sized ceratopsid dinosaur from what is now Utah. The fossils of the animal date back to over eighty million years ago, which makes it one of the earliest confirmed members of the Ceratopsidae – the ceratopsian lineage leading to Triceratops and its ilk. As one would expect, Diabloceratops is also one of the most “primitive” of the ceratopsids, though it has enough distinct features to classify it. Scientists usually place it as one of the most basal known members of the subfamily Centrosaurinae. It was closer to dinosaurs like Styracosaurus or Centrosaurus than it was to the chasmosaurine ceratopsids like Triceratops. Most of the later and better known centrosaurines tended to have little or no brow horns, but long nasal horns or other such structures on the snout. Diabloceratops, like many early centrosaurines, lacked a nasal horn and had relatively long, curving brow horns over each eye.

While its horn arrangement was different than that of later centrosaurines, Diabloceratops did share the same deep, beaked snout. Some speculate that centrosaurines were less selective feeders than the narrow-snouted chasmosaurines. Centrosaurines also tended to have shorter frills, which we can see on Diabloceratops itself. Its frill was not only short, but also fairly narrow and bore large openings (covered with skin in life). The animal’s most famous feature was the pair of long, outwardly curved hornlets at the top of its frill. Described in 2010, those hornlets would inspire its generic name – “devil horned face”. These horns and hornlets probably doubled as display and defensive features. Diabloceratops was in need of defense, as it lived in the same time and region as the early tyrannosaurid Lythronax, both being known from the Wahweap Formation. The same formation also contains hadrosaur, ankylosaur and more ceratopsid fossils.

Olorotitan

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Lambeosaurinae > Lambeosaurini

Overview: There are two major subfamilies in the family Hadrosauridae – the Saurolophinae and the Lambeosaurinae. Saurolophines, which included dinosaurs like Maiasaura and Edmontosaurus, usually had long and wide-billed snouts, while the snouts of lambeosaurines were shorter and more narrow. Bony head crests appeared among members of both subfamilies, but it those of the Lambeosaurinae were often far larger and more extravagant. We can see this with Olorotitan – the “giant swan”. Its crest, formed out of part of its nasal bones, took the form of a large, backward-pointing hatchet blade-like structure. The crest was hollow and linked to the respiratory system, so some believe Olorotitan, and other lambeosaurines with similar crests, could use their crests as resonating chambers to make loud calls. They also would’ve been used for courtship purposes.

Olorotitan was a decently large hadrosaurid, growing to be about eight or nine meters long, so in the same size range as related genera like Parasaurolophus or Lambeosaurus. These dinosaurs all evolved from bipedal ancestors. While they could walk up on their hind legs, most of their time would’ve been spent down on all fours, with low-level vegetation making up a fair bit of their diet. Olorotitan, like all hadrosaurids, had highly efficient jaws and teeth for dealing with even tougher plant material. Fossils attributed to Olorotitan are known from the Amur region of Russia, in the far eastern part of the country, along the Amur River, which forms a border with the northeast of China. Much of its skeleton has been recovered, with all bones being found within the rock layers of the Udurchukan Formation, meaning Olorotitan lived towards the end of the Cretaceous.

Scutellosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora

Overview: Most of the armored dinosaurs best known to the general public were decently large animals. This included the plate-backed Stegosaurus and the tanky Ankylosaurus. Their relatives were similarly impressive or were at least moderately large by today’s standards, but they all shared a common ancestor that was much smaller. Scutellosaurus itself probably wasn’t the direct ancestor of either the stegosaurs or ankylosaurs, but it was closely related to such a creature and gives us a good idea as to what it would’ve looked like. It was a basal member of the Thyreophora, which was a clade containing stegosaurs, ankylosaurs and other armored dinosaurs. Remains that are attributed to Scutellosaurus come from the Kayenta Formation of Arizona, which formed back in the Early Jurassic. Scutellosaurus lived much earlier than its famous, more derived cousins. The creature’s longer legs suggest it even retained the bipedal stance of earlier ornithischian ancestors. Its fossils were first found in the 1970’s, leading to its 1981 description.

Armored dinosaurs were protected by bony lumps, or osteoderms, which grew imbedded within the skin, often forming rows along the back, sides, neck and tail. Osteoderms are far from unique to thyreophorans, having appeared among some sauropods for instance, but they also aren’t unique to dinosaurs as a whole. Crocodiles and alligators, for instance, also have osteoderms over much of their backs. Those on Scutellosaurus were small and rounded in some spots, but somewhat spinier in others, though fairly modest. Its generic name, meaning “small-shielded lizard”, refers to these osteoderms. Dermal armor was of great use to it, since it wasn’t able to ward off predators by sheer size alone. Scutellosaurus was only a little over a meter in length as an adult. In addition to its armor, evasion and camouflage may’ve played some added role in its defense. The same region was also home to the theropod Dilophosaurus, which likely preyed on this animal.

Piatnitzkysaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Piatnitzkysauridae

Overview: So far, there are two known fossil specimens of Piatnitzkysaurus, from both a subadult and probable adult, both represented by partial skeletons. These remains were found within Argentina’s Cañadón Asfalto Formation during the mid to late 1970’s. Described by the renowned Argentine paleontologist José F. Bonaparte, the generic name of Piatnitzkysaurus is meant to honor the geologist Alejandro M. Piatnitzky. Piatnitzkysaurus would go on to become the namesake of its own family, the Piatnitzkysauridae, which may contain other notable taxa like Marshosaurus and Condorraptor. Members are mainly known from either South or North America, though a genus from China may also belong to the family according to some studies. Piatnitzkysaurid fossils are mainly known from the Early to Late Jurassic.

According to its remains, Piatnitzkysaurus wasn’t a particularly large theropod. It measured four to five meters long, so it could be considered medium-sized. Asfaltovenator, another theropod from the Cañadón Asfalto, was a bit larger. Said genus may’ve been the region’s top predator, while Piatnitzkysaurus hunted smaller herbivores. None of the piatnitzkysaurids grew to be all that large, so this mid-tier role was their main strong suit. The same region was also home to sauropod dinosaurs like Patagosaurus. Adults of said genus were probably too large for this dinosaur to take down, at least when healthy. In many studies, the Piatnitzkysauridae is placed within the larger superfamily Megalosauroidea, making them related to Megalosaurus. Some recent studies suggest they were closer to Allosaurus, in the superfamily Allosauroidea.

Sphaerotholus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Pachycephalosauria > Pachycephalosauridae > Pachycephalosaurinae

Overview: As with many other pachycephalosaurs, most of the fossils we’ve collected so far from Sphaerotholus consist of skull material, namely pieces of its thickened dome. This bone was solid in comparison to other parts of the skull or skeleton, so it’s little wonder that these domes have been so commonly preserved intact. We can fill in the gaps of this creature’s appearance with the fossils of other related animals. Sphaerotholus, like most pachycephalosaurs, was both a biped and mainly or entirely herbivorous. The tips of the jaws would’ve sported a narrow beak, while small teeth were situated farther back in the mouth. Growing to be about two meters long, Sphaerotholus was an average-sized pachycephalosaur. It was much smaller than the famous Pachycephalosaurus, a close relative, which was probably the largest known pachycephalosaur. In some regions, depending on the time period, the two genera may’ve coexisted.

The generic name of Sphaerotholus, coined in its 2002 description, is Greek for “spherical dome”, referring to its skull morphology. Paleontologists debate the exact purpose of pachycephalosaur skull domes, though it’s often assumed that they engaged in direct head butting behavior, similar to bighorn sheep or other such modern animals. Some are skeptical, pointing out that the anatomy of pachycephalosaur necks were ill suited for dealing with the stresses this would cause. It’s possible that Sphaerotholus competed with other members of its species by delivering side-to-side strikes with the head. The type specimen of this genus was found in New Mexico’s Kirtland Formation, but fossils now known to have belonged to it were actually found as early as the 1940’s, in Alberta. Sphaerotholus seems to have had a wide range over North America and across a decent amount of time. Fossils are even known from the Hell Creek Formation, so some species of Sphaerotholus may’ve had to contend with the infamous Tyrannosaurus as a potential predator.

Kentrosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Stegosauria > Stegosauridae

Overview: Kentrosaurus, not to be confused with the ceratopsid Centrosaurus, was a stegosaurian dinosaur that roamed what is now Tanzania in the Late Jurassic. The first recorded specimens of the creature were discovered by German paleontologists a few years before World War I. At that time, Tanzania was within the territory of German East Africa, a part of Germany’s larger colonial empire. Kentrosaurus was officially described as a genus in 1915, taking part of its name from the Greek root word for “prickle” or “sharp point”. This word is also used as the basis for the name of the aforementioned Centrosaurus, though with different spellings, both names are valid. In the case of Kentrosaurus, its generic name refers to its striking dermal armor. As with many other stegosaurs, this armor was probably used both defensively and for visual display purposes.

Within the Stegosauria, Kentrosaurus is usually referred to the family Stegosauridae, though most classify it as more basal that the famed Stegosaurus. It was also smaller than Stegosaurus, growing to maybe four or five meters long. All stegosaurs possessed enlarged dorsal osteoderms, though in many cases, they took on widely different forms between species. Those on Kentrosaurus took on the form of narrow plates over its neck and over the shoulders, but gradually grew into elongated spines towards its hips and down the tail. Two additional spines were once placed on its hips, but most modern reconstructions put them over its shoulders. Kentrosaurus was a primarily low-browsing herbivore. Its fossils are known from the famous Tendaguru Formation, so it would’ve lived alongside dinosaurs like Giraffatitan, Dicraeosaurus, Tornieria and Veterupristisaurus.

Patagotitan

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes > Somphospondyli > Titanosauria > Lithostrotia > Colossosauria > Lognkosauria

Overview: In 2010, a farm laborer in Argentina’s Chubut Province came across the fossilized leg bone of a gigantic sauropod. After the find was reported, paleontologists descended on the site to search for more fossils, in the end securing a partial skeleton. Recovered bones included pieces of the pelvis, shoulder bones, some ribs and a few vertebrae from the neck, back and upper tail. This specimen would become the holotype for the genus Patagotitan, described in 2017. Patagotitan is named for the region of Patagonia, much of which stretches over southern Argentina. Its name is also a reference to the Titans of Greek myth – fitting considering its enormity. While size estimates have varied, Patagotitan was probably over thirty meters in length and weighed as much as sixty or so standard tons. This easily made it a contender for the largest land animal known to science. The animal’s sheer size alone would’ve warded off all but the largest of predators.

Two other specimens of Patagotitan have been described, mainly consisting of some limb bones or vertebrae. While known fossils are limited, Patagotitan is actually pretty well represented for a sauropod of its size. The related Argentinosaurus, which is one of its only rivals in terms of body size, is also known from fairly limited, but enormous fossils (the vertebrae and limb bones alone of these dinosaurs were as tall as or even taller than a human being). Both dinosaurs belong to a lineage called the Lognkosauria, which represents some of the most derived members of the Titanosauria. Futalognkosaurus, another gigantic sauropod, was also a member of this group (and its namesake). Patagotitan was undoubtedly a high-browser, feeding on tall conifers and other such trees. Being known from the Cerro Barcino Formation, it would’ve shared its environment with the enormous carcharodontosaurid Tyrannotitan, which probably preyed on its young or weaker individuals.

Dromaeosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Dromaeosauridae > Eudromaeosauria > Dromaeosaurinae

Overview: Dromaeosaurus is the namesake of the Dromaeosauridae – the famous “raptor” family of dinosaurs. One would expect the namesake of such a family to be a well understood genus, but Dromaeosaurus is known from much fewer fossils than its more famous relatives like Deinonychus, Velociraptor or Utahraptor. The first of these limited fossils were described in 1922, having been unearthed by the American paleontologist Barnum Brown, in what is now Alberta, Canada. These fossils were found within the Dinosaur Park Formation, meaning that particular specimen would’ve lived about seventy-six million years ago. Some isolated fossils and teeth from other formations like the Horseshoe Canyon and Hell Creek have also been referred to Dromaeosaurus, extending its range towards the end of the Cretaceous, but there is some doubt over if they really belong to it. This animal lived in the shadow of larger predators like Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus.

Growing to be about two or so meters long, Dromaeosaurus would’ve been about the same length as Velociraptor, but it had a somewhat different appearance. Dromaeosaurus seems to have been somewhat bulkier and its skull was far more robust, with deeper jaws and larger teeth. While both of these dinosaurs possessed enlarged “killing claws” on the second toe of each foot, it appears that Dromaeosaurus relied more heavily on its jaws than the slender-snouted Velociraptor. Both of these dinosaurs are the namesakes of their respective dromaeosaurid subfamilies – Velociraptor for the Velociraptorinae and Dromaeosaurus for the Dromaeosaurinae. Dromaeosaurines tended to be more heavily built and had stronger jaws. The dromaeosaurids as a whole are known to have been feathered based on direct fossil evidence. While unable to fly, Dromaeosaurus could’ve used its plumage to help insulate clutches of eggs, for visual display or to give it a boost when running.

Amargasaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Dicraeosauridae

Overview: In the mid-1980’s, a team of Argentine paleontologists came across the partial skeleton of a highly unusual sauropod. This same expedition would also yield the fossils of the well known abelisaurid Carnotaurus, though the two genera didn’t live together and were separated by many tens of millions of years (Carnotaurus lived towards the end of the Cretaceous). The sauropod came from rocks dated to the Early Cretaceous, or around one hundred and twenty-five million years ago, in Argentina’s La Amarga Formation. The formation would inspire the creature’s generic name, Amargasaurus, coined in its 1991 description. Fossils of other sauropods, a theropod, and a potential stegosaur are also known from the La Amarga. Amargasaurus likely filled the niche of a low to mid-level browsing herbivore, given its size and neck length. The original holotype specimen of Amargasaurus remains the only one found thus far, which included shoulder bones, pieces of the pelvis, limb bones, and numerous vertebrae from the tail, spine and neck. The latter set of vertebrae contained the animal’s most distinctive traits.

Similar to some of its relatives, the neural spines sticking out from the neck vertebrae were double-pronged, instead of being only one process like in most animals. However, on Amargasaurus, these prongs were particularly elongated, the longest being up to sixty centimeters. These ran all along its neck and on the upper back. Scientists at first proposed these spines supported sails of skin, the purpose of which was unclear. Later, some studies would note features that suggested this wasn’t the case, with the spines being more like horns, bearing sheathes of keratin. Recently, the original idea has come back into favor. Either way, why it had this feature is still being debated. Spines could be useful for defense and display, but twin sails could’ve had some thermo-regulating function. Its close relative, Bajadasaurus, also had similar neck spines, though its were raked forwards, while those of Amargasaurus were raked towards the back. Both dinosaurs belonged to a family called the Dicraeosauridae, itself a part of the larger sauropod superfamily Diplodocoidea. As with most dicraeosaurids, Amargasaurus wasn’t very large for a sauropod, being medium-sized at best.

Procompsognathus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Coelophysoidea > Coelophysidae

Overview: Described in 1913 by the renowned German paleontologist Eberhard Fraas, the generic name of Procompsognathus literally means “before Compsognathus”. The name, from a certain point of view, is quite accurate. Procompsognathus did indeed live before Compsognathus, being found within Late Triassic-aged rocks in Germany. Compsognathus, on the other hand, is known from Late Jurassic-aged formations, also in Germany. Fraas would chose this name as he thought it may’ve been an ancestral form of Compsognathus, or was at least related to it. Current studies of both animals find no support for this idea, however. Compsognathus was either a basal member of the Coelurosauria, making it a distant relative of birds, or is possibly based on the juveniles of some large theropod of megalosauroid or allosauroid origins. Procompsognathus was a much more basal theropod genus, not belonging to any of these lineages or groups. Indeed, it may’ve belonged to one of the oldest branching lineages of confirmed theropods.

Most recent studies classify Procompsognathus as a basal neotheropod, specifically within the superfamily Coelophysoidea. It may’ve belonged to the family Coelophysidae, making it a close relative of Coelophysis itself. Coelophysids tended to be slender-bodied theropods with narrow skulls perched on semi-elongated necks. Like its relatives, Procompsognathus probably went after smaller vertebrates or insects. Procompsognathus itself was fairly small, measuring only a meter or so in length, even as an adult (confirmed by studies of the type specimen). It may’ve been a source of food itself for larger theropods like Liliensternus. Both dinosaurs are known from the rocks of Germany’s Löwenstein Formation, alongside the basal sauropodomorph Plateosaurus. Most in the wider public may recognize Procompsognathus for being featured in the Jurassic Park franchise. In the original 1990 novel, the writer Michael Crichton took some liberties and portrayed it as both a pack hunter and venomous. No evidence for such behavior or adaptations exists, however.

Skorpiovenator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Ceratosauria > Neoceratosauria > Abelisauroidea > Abelisauridae > Brachyrostra

Overview: Known primarily from the southern hemisphere, the Abelisauridae was one of the most successful theropod families of the Late Cretaceous. They often lived alongside other large-bodied theropods, some of which were quite a bit larger than the abelisaurids themselves. For this reason, they may’ve specialized at hunting smaller or medium-sized herbivores. Skorpiovenator itself lived in the same time and region as the large carcharodontosaurid Mapusaurus, which probably preyed on large sauropods like Argentinosaurus, or at least their young. Smaller sauropods or ornithopods may’ve been the main prey for Skorpiovenator, though it also probably scavenged the carcasses of the larger animals. All of these dinosaurs are known from the Huincul Formation in Argentina, with an estimated age of around ninety-five million years ago.

Described in 2009, Skorpiovenator was discovered on a farm in west-central Argentina. The name of the animal means “scorpion hunter”, referring not to its actual diet in life, but to the numerous scorpions that plagued the dig site. This dinosaur represents one of the more completely known genera in the Abelisauridae, with only some portions of its skeleton being absent on the holotype. It was an average-sized abelisaurid, being about six meters long. Like its close relatives, it sported a short, but deep set of jaws lined with relatively small teeth. The arms were extremely small, with no obvious use, making them potentially vestigial remnants (like the pelvic bones on some modern whales). Skorpiovenator belonged to the abelisaurid subgroup Brachyrostra, which makes it a close relative of the famous Carnotaurus, though it was a bit more “primitive” than said genus.

Brontosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Diplodocidae > Apatosaurinae

Overview: For much of the past century, if a scientifically-based list of dinosaurs were made, this incredibly famous genus probably wouldn’t have been included. It was first established as a genus in 1879 by the renowned American paleontologist Othniel C. Marsh. The creature’s name, meaning “thunder lizard”, is meant to invoke its impressive size. Indeed, it was one of the largest dinosaurs known at that time. Two years prior, Marsh had described a very similar dinosaur, which he named Apatosaurus. Upon studying Brontosaurus, he concluded the two were distinct taxa. In 1903, a far more detailed re-description of both dinosaurs was published by Elmer S. Riggs, in the same year he described the genus Brachiosaurus. Riggs found that Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus were far too similar to be distinct genera, though he recognized them as separate on the specific (species) level. He officially reassigned the species Brontosaurus excelsus and Brontosaurus parvus to the genus Apatosaurus. Apatosaurus, being described first, had priority if they were the same genus. Most paleontologists would agree with Riggs, so the name Brontosaurus fell out of official use.

It would be a different story in popular culture, however. Two years later, in 1905, a fully mounted skeleton would be unveiled in the American Museum of Natural History, labeled as Brontosaurus. It would cause the name to spread among the general public, eventually to a point that most people came to refer to all sauropods as “brontosaurs”. The skeleton was also mounted with an incorrect skull, that of a Camarasaurus, but contrary to popular myth, this had nothing to do with why the generic name was changed. Eventually, all mounted skeletons of all referred Apatosaurus species were labeled as such. Brontosaurus being a junior synonym of Apatosaurus would remain the popular consensus among researchers until the 2010’s. In 2015, a study was published that found the species originally referred to Brontosaurus, along with one since referred to Apatosaurus (now B. yahnahpin), had enough differences to warrant them being in a separate genus. Not all agreed with this conclusion, but it has since found quite a bit of support among researchers.

Even if Brontosaurus was distinct from Apatosaurus, the two animals were clearly closely related, bearing most superficial features in common. Both belonged to the sauropod family Diplodocidae, a part of the larger neosauropod superfamily Diplodocoidea. This made them related to genera like Barosaurus and Diplodocus. Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus, however, were a bit more basal, belonging to a subfamily called the Apatosaurinae. Apatosaurine diplodocids tended to be bulkier, with thicker necks than those of the diplodocine diplodocids. Between the two, Apatosaurus was the more heavily built genus, with Brontosaurus typically being a bit smaller. Still, it was one of the largest animals in its local environment. Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus are both known from the Late Jurassic-aged Morrison Formation in the western United States. Some Brontosaurus species are known from deeper layers of the Morrison than those of Apatosaurus. These animals lived in a semi-arid, seasonal environment, alongside many other sauropods, stegosaurs, ornithopods and a few large theropods like Allosaurus, Ceratosaurus and Torvosaurus.

Ouranosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes (?)

Overview: During the 1960’s and 1970’s, teams of French paleontologists went into the deserts of Niger in search of fossils. Among those recovered was a set of remains belonging to a fairly large ornithopod dinosaur, bearing some rather distinctive features. In 1976, these fossils were used as the basis for the genus Ouranosaurus, the name of which is derived from both Arabic and Greek, meaning “brave lizard”. The name is also based on a similar word used by the local Tuareg people to refer to monitor lizards in the region. Ouranosaurus may’ve been named as such due to it having lived among some fairly fearsome theropods. Its fossils date back to over one hundred and ten million years ago, in the Early Cretaceous. Most of them were found within the rocks of Niger’s Elrhaz Formation, meaning it coexisted with dinosaurs like Lurdusaurus, Nigersaurus and Suchomimus. In that time, the region was fairly lush and wet, with marshes and numerous rivers.

The basic body plan of Ouranosaurus was mostly like that of other iguanodonts. It could walk up on its hind legs or down on all fours and grew to maybe seven or eight meters in length. What the genus is primarily known for, however, was its unusual neural spines. These spines, especially over its shoulder and upper back, were extremely tall. Some restorations, particularly older ones, depict these spines supporting a kind of skin sail. Such a sail may’ve been used for visual display or to help regulate its temperature by taking in or shedding heat. Alternatively, the spines may’ve supported a camel-like hump or ridge of fat and other such tissues, to store energy when food was scarce. The head was notable too, being quite flat in profile with a small crest above the eyes. Ouranosaurus was originally classified close to Iguanodon, in the Iguanodontidae. Later studies, however, find it to have been more derived than Iguanodon, or even in the hadrosauroid superfamily.

Monolophosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda (?) > Carnosauria (?)

Overview: Fossilized remains belonging to this medium-sized theropod are known from the region of Xinjiang, in western China. The holotype and so far only specimen of Monolophosaurus consists of a decent portion of the animal’s skull and body, excavated over the course of the 1980’s. Rock layers surrounding the bones date to the Middle Jurassic, geologists attributing them to the larger Shishugou Formation, preserving a semi-arid and seasonal environment. Monolophosaurus may’ve lived alongside notable dinosaurs like Limusaurus, Guanlong and Sinraptor, though these dinosaurs are often attributed to slightly younger sections of the Shishugou. With a length of about five to six meters, Monolophosaurus was probably going after smaller and medium-sized herbivores. Sources of food may’ve included smaller theropods, stegosaurs, early ceratopsians and young sauropods.

Monolophosaurus, the “single-crested lizard”, was named in reference to its most notable trait – a large, bony crest growing along the length of its snout. This crest was low, thin and bore a handful of openings, which in life may’ve been covered by keratin or other such tissues. Its exact purpose is unknown, but the keratin covering it may’ve been brightly colored or patterned, allowing it to signal its health and vitality to potential mates or ward off rivals. The aforementioned Guanlong, which was a fair bit smaller than Monolophosaurus, also had a similar crest. Some speculate that it was a juvenile of this genus, but the fossils referred to Guanlong were from a fully grown individual. On top of that, Guanlong is usually seen as an early tyrannosaur. Monolophosaurus has a somewhat more unstable phylogenetic status. It has been classified as a basal tetanuran, a relative of the allosauroids, related to the megalosauroids or even close to the spinosaurids.

Brachiosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes > Brachiosauridae

Overview: One of the most recognizable of the sauropods, Brachiosaurus was first described as a genus in 1903 by the American paleontologist Elmer S. Riggs. He based the description on a set of partial remains discovered a few years earlier in Colorado. Recovered fossils included limb bones, vertebrae, ribs, and part of the hips. Its generic name means “arm lizard”, referring to how its front limbs were longer than its hind limbs, which at that time was quite unusual for a sauropod. Also notable for that time was its size, with it being the largest sauropod described up until that point. It was poorly known from fossils, however. This would seemingly change in 1914, when a supposed new species of Brachiosaurus was named from Tanzania; Brachiosaurus brancai. It was based on a far more complete set of remains. The general image most people have of Brachiosaurus is heavily based on this African species. Its tall, arched nasal bone and short torso are commonly pictured elements of its physique. Older artistic depictions of Brachiosaurus draw heavily from its anatomy, which is unfortunate, as Brachiosaurus brancai is no longer classified under Brachiosaurus at all.

Differences between the type species, B. altithorax, and those of B. brancai were noted as early as the 1980’s. The latter was officially recognized as a separate genus, called Giraffatitan. Some of its notable differences were its far narrower chest, shorter torso, shorter tail, and overall lighter build than that of Brachiosaurus. Definitive skull material from Brachiosaurus also showed that its nasal arch, while somewhat tall, was not as dramatic as that of Giraffatitan. The two were still relatives, being classified in the family Brachiosauridae. They were also some of the largest animals in their respective environments and were alive at around the same time. Brachiosaurus is currently only known from the Morrison Formation in the United States. It coexisted with other sauropod genera like Camarasaurus and Diplodocus, probably feeding from much taller branches than either, being able to reach up to nine meters or more in the air. While no longer the largest known dinosaur, it was still large enough to ward off most predators as an adult, which may’ve included theropods like Allosaurus or Torvosaurus. Brachiosaurus fossils, unfortunately, remain quite rare even now. Some scattered remains continue to be found, with a few suggesting some rare individuals grew to be notably larger than others.

Teratophoneus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Pantyrannosauria > Eutyrannosauria > Tyrannosauridae > Tyrannosaurinae > Teratophoneini

Overview: As the Late Cretaceous wore on, the large predator niches in North America were slowly being taken over by tyrannosaurids. Among these were a handful belonging to a lineage seemingly unique to the American southwest, classified within a tribe called the Teratophoneini. Members of this group were a part of the subfamily Tyrannosaurinae, so they were closely related to dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus and Tarbosaurus. The tribe takes its name from Teratophoneus, one of its more well known members, found within the rocks of Utah’s Kaiparowits Formation. It was geologically younger than its relative Lythronax, having lived about seventy-six million years ago. Described as a genus in 2011, the name of Teratophoneus is derived from Greek, meaning “monstrous murderer” in reference to its inferred ferocity, size and status as an apex predator within its environment.

Teratophoneus is currently known from around a half dozen specimens, so its general appearance is fairly well understood. It was a medium to large-sized tyrannosaurid, growing to be about seven or eight meters in length, so about the same size as its close relatives like Lythronax. The jaws were deep, suggesting it had a decent bite force. Tyrannosaurids mainly relied upon their jaws to kill, the arms tending to be relatively short and with only two digits on each hand. Major sources of food for Teratophoneus may’ve included a species of the hadrosaur genus Parasaurolophus and a few ceratopsids like Nasutoceratops or Kosmoceratops. These dinosaurs lived along a fairly humid and lush coast, with the center of North America being submerged by the Western Interior Seaway. In the region’s waterways prowled the gigantic crocodilian (or crocodilian relative) Deinosuchus, which was a threat to this animal itself.

Alvarezsaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Alvarezsauroidea > Alvarezsauridae

Overview: Coelurosaurs, the theropod lineage from which birds evolved, diverged relatively early in the history of dinosaurs, at least having done so by the Early Jurassic. From there, they would soon diversify into many distinct clades and families, some of them quite unusual in comparison to most other theropods. Alvarezsaurus is the namesake of one such group. It’s classified as a member of the family Alvarezsauridae, a part of the larger superfamily Alvarezsauroidea. These coelurosaurs are grouped into the Maniraptora, which made them closely related to birds. Indeed, some have mistaken the remains of these animals for birds themselves. They were typically quite tiny as far as non-avian dinosaurs go, with fragile bones. Measuring more than a meter long, Alvarezsaurus was actually one of the larger alvarezsauroids. Alvarezsauroids as a whole may’ve first evolved in the Late Jurassic, but reached their peak during the Cretaceous Period.

Alvarezsaurus itself is based on partial remains. Known bones include some vertebrae, parts of the pelvis, lower leg bones, part of the shoulders and bones from the hand. Based on these remains, we know it was probably similar in appearance to most other alvarezsaurids, being a slender and agile creature. The skull isn’t known, but those of its relatives usually sported large eye sockets and narrow jaws lined with needle-like teeth. Alvarezsaurus may’ve been adapted for going after small prey, specifically insects and grubs. Alvarezsaurids often had remarkably tiny arms and, in many cases, only a single claw on each hand. The forelimbs of this genus may’ve been somewhat less reduced in size, given its status as a more basal member of the Alvarezsauridae. Alvarezsaurus is known from Argentina’s Bajo de la Carpa Formation, dated to eighty-five million years ago. Named in 1991, its generic name honors the late Argentine historian Gregorio Álvarez.

Ichthyovenator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Spinosauridae > Spinosaurinae

Overview: Ichthyovenator is a genus based on a single partial skeleton, unearthed in what is today the landlocked nation of Laos, in Southeast Asia. Recovered bones include most of the pelvis, the vertebrae behind the pelvis, a few tail vertebrae, some ribs, and most of the neck. Based on these bones, we can determine that Ichthyovenator belonged to the family Spinosauridae, which allows us to fill in the gaps missing from the skeleton with at least some degree of potential accuracy. Its skull is unknown, but we know that spinosaurids invariably had elongated, notched jaws lined with conical teeth. Such jaws were well suited for a diet of fish and other slippery prey. This inferred diet is referenced by the creature’s generic name, a combination of Greek and Latin for “fish hunter”. Ichthyovenator probably spent much of its time wading in rivers, lakes or lagoons on the prowl for its preferred prey, though we know spinosaurids also consumed terrestrial vertebrates (including other dinosaurs). Its fossils are known from the Grès Supérieurs Formation, so it’s known to have coexisted with a few sauropods, the young of which may’ve been a food source.

In addition to their crocodile-like snouts, spinosaurids are also known for a few other traits. Their arms, for instance, were often quite large and sported prominent claws. We can assume this was likely the case for Ichthyovenator. Some, in particular Spinosaurus itself, had elongated neural spines along their backs. This trait is also present on Ichthyovenator, though to a lesser degree, with it having a low sail or ridge running down the back, in its case having a small dip just above its pelvis. This may’ve been a display structure or a way to store body fat, though we can’t be entirely certain. The neural spines on the tail were also quite tall, making it resemble a paddle. Spinosaurus also had such a tail, which some see as evidence of swimming behavior, but others aren’t so sure, pointing out they lacked the proper musculature near the base of the tail, like we see on crocodiles for instance. Spinosaurids varied widely in size, with Ichthyovenator being a decently large genus in the same size range as Baryonyx or even Suchomimus, though it wasn’t anywhere near as large as Spinosaurus. It’s probably the largest spinosaurid yet described from Asia.

Plateosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Plateosauridae

Overview: “Prosauropod” is a casual term used to refer to sauropodomorphs, mainly bipedal ones, that fall outside of the Sauropoda proper. It used to be considered a scientific clade, but it has since fallen out of use, with “prosauropods” representing many separate lineages. One of the most well known of the “prosauropods” was Plateosaurus – the “broad lizard”. The genus was established in 1837 by the German paleontologist Hermann von Meyer, though what trait on the creature he was referencing as “broad” has since become a mystery. Researchers later recognized Plateosaurus as a dinosaur, with it becoming the namesake of the family Plateosauridae. Various other genera of “prosauropod” were referred to this family, though today only a handful are accepted as true plateosaurids. Since then, multiple dozens of Plateosaurus specimens have been found, including those of different growth stages. In addition to Germany, fossils have been reported from France, Switzerland and off the coast of Norway (unearthed by oil drilling). Fossils found in Greenland have since been given their own genus, known as Issi, which is still seen as a fellow plateosaurid.

The basic body plan of Plateosaurus was quite stereotypical for a “prosauropod”. While some early restorations depicted it as quadrupedal, studies of its wrist anatomy in recent decades have proven it was restricted to bipedal movement. It couldn’t support its weight with its hands. This freed up its hands, and namely its claws, for other uses, including foraging or for defense. Its neck was long, topped by a fairly small, slender skull. The jaws had a notable downward curve towards the end and the teeth were relatively simple. Plateosaurus mainly fed upon plants like ferns, cycads or conifers. Notably, this animal doesn’t appear to have had one standard size as an adult. Adult specimens of the genus could be anywhere between five to even ten meters long. While not as heavily built as its later sauropod relatives, Plateosaurus was decently large by Late Triassic standards. Plateosaurus fossils are known from formations like the Trossingen and Löwenstein. It probably lived alongside other dinosaurs like Procompsognathus and Liliensternus, the latter of which may’ve been a major threat to Plateosaurus itself. It lived in a highly seasonal environment with dry and wet periods.

Torosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Chasmosaurinae > Triceratopsini

Overview: Torosaurus was one of the largest known members of the family Ceratopsidae, as well as one of the last to appear in the fossil record. It lived close to the very end of the Cretaceous, in what is now the western United States and Canada, where its fossils can be found in the rocks of the Lance, Hell Creek, Scollard and other geological formations. Adults were about eight or nine meters in length, with quite robust and heavy builds overall. The creature’s skull alone was huge, being a contender of the largest of any land-dwelling animal in earth’s history, measuring close to three meters long on some individuals. Ceratopsids all had bony frills growing from the back of the skull, which in the case of Torosaurus was particularly exaggerated. It was long, often rectangular in form and sported two large openings, which likely means the frill wasn’t useful as a shield. This structure may’ve been used for visual display. In addition to its frill, Torosaurus also possessed a pair of long, curving brow horns and a smaller nasal horn above its beak. In general, its appearance was very similar to that of the famous Triceratops, which it seems to have coexisted with.

Some paleontologists speculate that Torosaurus wasn’t really a distinct genus at all, but the mature form of Triceratops. Those who support this idea contend that the frill, which on Triceratops was a lot shorter and solid, without large openings, would grow quickly over the last stage of its life, into that seen on Torosaurus. Of course, if this were true, then Torosaurus would be a junior synonym of Triceratops, since Triceratops was described and named first. Fossil evidence, however, suggests the two were probably distinct, but closely related taxa. Torosaurus and Triceratops were about the same size, so such a radical change so late is quite strange. Fossils in Canada may represent the juvenile stage of Torosaurus, with traits proving it was a separate taxon. Both are classified within the subfamily Chasmosaurinae and the tribe Triceratopsini. Other dinosaurs in their shared region included Edmontosaurus, Ankylosaurus and Tyrannosaurus. Torosaurus was formally described as a genus in 1891 by Othniel C. Marsh, who also described Triceratops. Its name means “perforated lizard”, referring to its frill openings, which in life were covered by flesh and scales.

Gallimimus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Ornithomimosauria > Ornithomimoidea > Ornithomimidae

Overview: Ornithomimids were a family of superficially ostrich-like dinosaurs that flourished in the Late Cretaceous. They were especially prominent in North America and Asia, where they probably acted as a food source for many carnivores, while being mostly generalist or omnivorous feeders themselves. Gallimimus is probably the most widely known member of the Ornithomimidae, thanks to its portrayal in the Jurassic Park franchise. There, its basic anatomy is represented with a fair bit of accuracy, though fossil evidence found since has revealed the ornithomimids to have possessed feathers in life. Integument of this sort is to be expected, considering the family is placed within the Coelurosauria, making them relatively closely related to birds. Gallimimus and its ornithomimid relatives were also related to other families in a larger group called the Ornithomimosauria, most prominently the Deinocheiridae (a group of more basal, often bulkier ornithomimosaurs).

Growing to be up to six meters long, Gallimimus is the largest known ornithomimid (though some of the deinocheirids grew to be even larger). Largest or not, its overall form was slender, as was to be expected. Ornithomimids were long-legged creatures that mainly relied upon evasion and speed to escape danger. Like its relatives, Gallimimus had an elongated neck topped by a tiny skull, the jaws of which had no teeth. It probably ate a mix of smaller animals and plant matter. All known Gallimimus fossils come from Mongolia’s Nemegt Formation, dated to seventy million years ago. It coexisted with dinosaurs such as Tarchia, Saurolophus, Therizinosaurus, Deinocheirus and Tarbosaurus, the latter of which was probably the region’s top predator. Described by Polish paleontologists in 1972, the generic name of Gallimimus means “chicken mimic”, a combination of Latin and Greek. It’s a well understood genus, being based on at least two dozen individual specimens.

Udanoceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Euceratopsia > Leptoceratopsidae

Overview: Leptoceratopsids were a family of ceratopsians that lived in what is now Asia and North America during the latter part of the Cretaceous. They were more basal than their ceratopsid kin, though in some regions, specifically North America, the two families would coexist in more or less the same regions. Udanoceratops is known from Mongolia, where ceratopsids don’t seem to have lived. In a way, Udanoceratops could be seen as having filled in a niche left vacant by that absence. Most of the leptoceratopsids were small, measuring only two or so meters long, but this dinosaur was up to four meters in length, so significantly larger than any other known member of its family. Fossils of the genus are known from the Djadochta and Barun Goyot Formations, so it lived in an arid environment alongside dinosaurs like Protoceratops, Velociraptor and Oviraptor.

Known fossils of Udanoceratops include most of the skull and a few vertebrae. The skull itself was likely its most notable feature, being quite enormous, though even smaller leptoceratopsids tended to have proportionately large heads. The jaws were remarkably deep, suggesting its beaked jaws had a strong bite. Udanoceratops could snap apart an attacking predator’s legs or arms just as easily as it would a branch or root. Low-lying vegetation would’ve made up most of its diet, though how much was available likely depended on the time of year. More derived ceratopsid taxa, such as the ceratopsids or even Protoceratops, often had large skull frills. Udanoceratops and those in its family tended to lack such frills, having at most a ridge of bone. Described in 1992, Udanoceratops takes its name from the Udan Sayr fossil site, where the holotype was first recovered.

Mamenchisaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Mamenchisauridae

Overview: In the 1950’s, a team of road workers in the Sichuan Province of China stumbled upon the fossils of a large dinosaur. The fossils were described in 1954 by paleontologist Yang Zhongjian, known to his western peers as C. C. Young, as a new genus. Yang, who was by far the most prolific Chinese paleontologist at that time, gave it the name Mamenchisaurus – the “Mamenxi lizard”. This name was meant to refer to Mamingxi, the area where it was found, which Yang would mistake for the similarly named “Mamenxi”. Most of the remains recovered included vertebrae from the neck and tail, as well as some limb material. In the years to follow, scientists would describe many other Mamenchisaurus specimens from all over China. Currently, around eight or so species are assigned to the genus. Yang’s specimen was found in the famous Shaximiao Formation, but other supposed species came from many other geological formations, representing an oddly wide span of time for a dinosaur genus. For this reason, it’s likely not all of these species belong to Mamenchisaurus, but we can’t be certain until Yang’s holotype specimen is re-described in more rigorous detail.

Some of the referred species of Mamenchisaurus were quite large, being over twenty or possibly even thirty meters in length, making it one of the largest dinosaurs known from China. Others were more modest in size, at maybe fifteen meters long. In any case, the necks of these animals tended to be quite long in proportion to the rest of the body. Among the largest Mamenchisaurus species, the neck could be between twelve and fifteen meters long by themselves, meaning it had one of the longest necks of any known dinosaur. Mamenchisaurus was, undoubtedly, a high-browser, able to feed from branches out of reach from the other sauropods it lived with. Even if it turns out that most of the species referred to Mamenchisaurus don’t belong to the genus, there’s a good chance they were still close relatives. Mamenchisaurus is the namesake of the family Mamenchisauridae, classified as a group of basal eusauropods. For the most part, these sauropods lived in Asia, though at least one genus has been described from Africa. They too possessed proportionately long necks, even by sauropod standards, as well as a wide range of body sizes as adults.

Afrovenator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Megalosauridae > Afrovenatorinae

Overview: Afrovenator was probably the apex predator of its own local environment. It would’ve lived in the latter part of the Middle Jurassic or into the Late Jurassic, in what is now Niger. Fossils of the animal come from the Tiourarén Formation and possibly the older Irhazer Shale. There are some fossils in Tanzania and as far away as South America, specifically in Uruguay, that may belong to Afrovenator, though their referral to this genus remains questionable. Afrovenator lived in what appears to have been a seasonal environment, where it stalked woodlands and open plains alike. It preyed on basal sauropods like Jobaria and possibly Spinophorosaurus. Afrovenator is estimated to have been seven or eight meters long, so it was decently large, especially for its time. Even if it was unable to take down the largest of the adult sauropods in its region, juveniles were vulnerable. Its legs suggest it was probably decently fast for a theropod of its size.

Phylogenetic studies usually place Afrovenator within the family Megalosauridae, making it related to the famous Megalosaurus, as well as other taxa like Torvosaurus and Eustreptospondylus. Some studies refer it to its own subfamily within the group, called the Afrovenatorinae. Some European megalosaurids also may have belonged to this lineage, though the internal classifications within the Megalosauridae remain unstable. There have even been some studies that classify Afrovenator not in the Megalosauridae, but closer to the spinosaurids, as a basal relative, but not as a spinosaurid itself. Afrovenator did, however, share its basic body plan with most megalosaurids. It possessed fairly strong arms, the hands of which sported three clawed digits. The jaws were low and long, with studies suggesting it had fairly strong neck muscles, making it easy to tear away chunks of flesh. In front of each eye was a small crest, probably used for visual display purposes, to signal health and vitality.

Pachycephalosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Pachycephalosauria > Pachycephalosauridae > Pachycephalosaurinae

Overview: There’s a lot of mystery surrounding the origins of the dome-headed pachycephalosaurs, though they do appear to have been well established by the end of the Early Cretaceous. Towards the end of the Cretaceous, however, they would see their peak of success and diversity. Among the many genera from that time, there was Pachycephalosaurus itself, the namesake of both the clade Pachycephalosauria and the family Pachycephalosauridae. Pachycephalosaurs are classified close to the horned ceratopsians, though unlike derived ceratopsians, such as Triceratops, none of these dome-headed creatures evolved into quadrupeds. Pachycephalosaurus is notable for being, by far, the largest known member of its lineage, at four to five meters in length. Most others averaged at two meters long. As with other pachycephalosaurs, this genus possessed a thickened, rounded mass of bone atop its skull, fringed by small, pointed hornlets at the rear. Similar hornlets can also be seen along its snout. Pachycephalosaurus had a beaked snout, paired with rows of shearing teeth farther back in its jaws. It was either a herbivore or possibly omnivorous.

Debate surrounds why Pachycephalosaurus and its kin evolved domed heads. Restorations of this animal often depict it engaging in direct, one-on-one head butting between competing individuals, primarily males. Their neck anatomy may’ve been ill suited to this, so side-to-side strikes are seen as more likely by some researchers. Pachycephalosaurus was established as a genus in 1943, but for a time, its fossils were associated with the teeth of the dubious genus Troodon (a maniraptoran theropod). The family Troodontidae was, for a time, incorrectly used for the pachycephalosaurids. Pachycephalosaurus lived towards the end of the Cretaceous, coming from the Hell Creek, Lance and other similar geological formations. Two genera, Dracorex and Stygimoloch, are also found in these formations, but they may merely be younger growth stages of Pachycephalosaurus; debate is still ongoing on this subject. Pachycephalosaurus coexisted with other famous herbivorous dinosaur genera like Triceratops, Edmontosaurus, Thescelosaurus and Ankylosaurus. Both it and these plant-eating genera would’ve been prey for theropods like Tyrannosaurus or Nanotyrannus.

Invictarx

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae

Overview: With its extensive armor and low-slung body, Invictarx is readily recognizable as having belonged to the Ankylosauria. Between the two major ankylosaur families, the Nodosauridae and Ankylosauridae, Invictarx usually finds itself referred to the former family. Nodosaurid genera like Glyptodontopelta may’ve been among its closest relatives. Members of this family tended to lack the clubbed tails of the ankylosaurs, but they often made up for it with large spines on their necks, shoulders or sides. As for Invictarx, we can’t be sure of the exact arrangement of its armor, but we do have some pieces of it in the form of osteoderms. Described as a genus in 2018, this armor was the inspiration for its generic name, meaning “invincible fortress” in Latin.

Invictarx is known from three or so specimens, represented by partial remains. In addition to the creature’s dermal armor, other known bones include ribs, vertebrae, and parts of the limbs. All of these fossils were found within the Menefee Formation of New Mexico. Invictarx would’ve lived alongside many other herbivorous dinosaurs, including hadrosaurs and ceratopsids. Theropods in the region included a dromaeosaur (possibly Saurornitholestes) and Dynamoterror – a member of the Tyrannosauridae and probably the region’s top land predator. Said region was a coastline, with numerous deltas, rivers, lagoons, and swamps. Invictarx also had to contend with gigantic river-dwelling predators like Deinosuchus (a crocodilian or close relative of true crocodilians).

Zupaysaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda

Overview: Growing to be only four to five meters long with a slender build, Zupaysaurus wasn’t a very large theropod in the grand scheme of things. However, for the Late Triassic, it was decently large. Its earliest dinosaurian ancestors were considerably smaller. Still, despite its impressive size for that point in time, Zupaysaurus still may’ve lived in the shadow of much larger, non-dinosaurian predators. This likely included land-dwelling, distant crocodile relatives like Fasolasuchus, isolated bones of which suggest lengths of up to nine or ten meters, which was much larger than any known theropod both at that time and a fair ways into the Jurassic Period. Even so, Zupaysaurus would’ve been a force to be reckoned with as far as the young of dinosaurs like Lessemsaurus or Riojasaurus were concerned. Fossils of these animals are all known from Argentina’s Los Colorados Formation.

Zupaysaurus was first described in 2003, based on most of its skull, parts of the shoulder, vertebrae, and a few limb bones. Its generic name means “devil lizard”, though it more specifically refers to an entity from Incan mythology called “Supay” or “Zupay”, a deity linked with death and the underworld. To this day, Zupaysaurus is only known from one fossil specimen, the holotype, originally discovered six or so years prior to its description. Based on the known material, we can see that Zupaysaurus sported a slender-snouted, lightly constructed skull that probably had a pair of low crests running down the length of the snout. There was a notable notch near the tip of its upper jaw, which we often see on the snouts of basal neotheropods. Some classify it close to Coelophysis and its family, but others see it as a more generalized neotheropod, probably more basal than Dilophosaurus or Cryolophosaurus.

Camarasaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Camarasauridae

Overview: As far as the Late Jurassic is concerned, few geological formations are as famous or as fossil rich as the Morrison Formation, stretching across a large swath, from what is now Montana to as far south as New Mexico. Numerous well known and large sauropod genera have been found in the Morrison, including Diplodocus, Apatosaurus and Brachiosaurus. By far the most common of these sauropods, however, was Camarasaurus. It appears to have been particularly successful in the region, which at that time was a vast, semi-arid and seasonal plain. Camarasaurus is represented by at least three species. The geologically youngest, as well as the largest, was the type species Camarasaurus supremus, which could reach lengths of over twenty meters. Camarasaurus grandis and Camarasaurus lentus were generally smaller, being medium-sized sauropods. Multiple genera of Morrison sauropods would’ve coexisted with each other, so they likely would’ve been adapted for different feeding niches. Aside from sauropods, other notable dinosaurs from the Morrison included Stegosaurus, Camptosaurus, Dryosaurus, Ceratosaurus, Torvosaurus, and Allosaurus.

Camarasaurus possessed a fairly boxy skull, bearing a blunt snout and wide openings. Famously, for a time, the skull of this animal was wrongly associated with Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus. The bite force of Camarasaurus was a bit stronger than that of other sauropods, which paired well with its chisel-like teeth. As with the majority of sauropods, excluding Brachiosaurus and some others, the forelimbs of Camarasaurus were shorter than its hind legs, but due to the profile of its back, it had a somewhat more evenly inclined torso. Camarasaurus and Brachiosaurus were relatively close to one another phylogenetically, belonging to the clade Macronaria, though the latter was a bit more derived. Camarasaurus is the namesake of the family Camarasauridae, though there is controversy over what sauropods actually belonged to it. Lourinhasaurus, from Portugal, was possibly a related to Camarasaurus. The genus Camarasaurus was established in 1877 by the renowned paleontologist Edward D. Cope. Its name, meaning “chambered lizard”, refers to extensive hollow chambers that ran throughout its vertebrae – a common weight reducing adaptation among sauropods.

Shri

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Dromaeosauridae > Eudromaeosauria > Velociraptorinae

Overview: Fossils of this small carnivore were first unearthed in the early 1990’s, later described in 1999 as belonging to the genus Velociraptor. Later studies would note some traits that suggested the bones came from a related, but distinct genus, leading to Shri being described as such in 2021. The full scientific name of the type species, Shri devi, refers to a Tibetan Buddhist deity known as Palden Lhamo – alternatively known as “Shri Devi”. Tibetan Buddhism was historically influential in Mongolia, where the animal was discovered. In 2025, a second species, Shri rapax, was referred to the genus. The two species are distinguished by some minor traits, but the differences between the genus Shri and Velociraptor were more striking. Shri tended to have shorter, deeper jaws, a larger thumb claw, and an overall stockier build when compared to that of Velociraptor. Many features were shared however, including their general size, birdlike anatomy, and enlarged toe claws.

Paleontologists classify both Shri and Velociraptor within the family Dromaeosauridae and the two likely shared the same subfamily, called the Velociraptorinae. Velociraptorines usually had longer, narrower snouts than other dromaeosaurids, though Shri shows us that there was some variation in snout shape among them. The two genera are also known from similar geological formations, with Shri devi coming from the Barun Goyot and Shri rapax from the Djadochta. Velociraptor was first discovered in the latter formation. It’s possible that the two occupied different niches, going after different types of prey, though we can’t be sure. Both lived in an arid environment, the land covered by sand dunes and seasonal streams or lakes. Velociraptorine dromaeosaurids appear to have flourished in such environments, as other genera and species come from this region. Direct fossil evidence on Velociraptor itself suggests that these animals were extensively feathered.

Magyarosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes > Somphospondyli > Titanosauria > Lithostrotia

Overview: Sauropod dinosaurs are famous for two things, those being their elongated necks and great size. Magyarosaurus possessed the former trait, but it was far from enormous. Indeed, with a length of three to five meters when mature, Magyarosaurus was one of the smallest sauropods yet to be described. Ironically, it belonged to the titanosaurian lineage of sauropods, which contained a lot of medium-sized sauropods, but also some of the largest ever found. Studies suggest it was a somewhat derived titanosaur, though its status among its relatives had little bearing on its size. Its overall appearance, despite its size, was similar to most other titanosaurs. It sported an elongated neck and a presumably tiny head. No referable skull material has been found, which is typical for sauropods and titanosaurs in particular, due to their small and often fragile skulls. Magyarosaurus likely fed from lower tree branches or cycads.

If its phylogenetic status didn’t directly influence its smaller size, then that leaves the question as to what did. The answer can be found in the region where Magyarosaurus was found. All of its known fossil specimens come from what is now western Romania. During the Late Cretaceous, large swaths of Europe were underwater due to higher sea levels, creating island chains. Magyarosaurus lived on Hațeg Island, alongside numerous other dinosaurs. Islands have limited resources, which influences many island-dwellers to grow smaller body sizes to compensate. This process is known as “insular dwarfism”, which appears to have occurred in Magyarosaurus. Described in 1932, Magyarosaurus takes part of its name from that of the Magyar, or Hungarian people. Transylvania, where its fossils were found, was still a part of the Kingdom of Hungary back when its holotype fossils were first discovered, in the 1890’s.

Edmontonia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae > Panoplosaurini

Overview: Fossils of this armored herbivore were originally unearthed in the mid-1910’s, in what is now Alberta, Canada. These were at first referred to a genus called Palaeoscincus, which is usually seen as a dubious taxon today. Said fossils, however, weren’t the holotype specimen. The actual holotype was found almost a decade later, also in Alberta, later described in 1928 under the name Edmontonia longiceps. In the 1940’s, the fossils referred to Palaeoscincus were reclassified as an additional species; Edmontonia rugosidens. The generic name of Edmontonia can refer to either the Canadian city of Edmonton, located near to where the holotype was found, or to what was then known as the Edmonton Formation – now the Horseshoe Canyon Formation. Edmontonia fossils have also been reported from the Dinosaur Park and Judith River Formations, the latter extending its range across the American border, into the state of Montana. Many specimens of Edmontonia are decently preserved and consist of much of the skeleton, as well as its dermal armor. This makes it one of the best understood ankylosaurs from North America.

Edmontonia is usually classified as a member of the ankylosaur family Nodosauridae, with genera like Panoplosaurus and Denversaurus being among its closest relatives. All three are usually placed within the nodosaurid tribe Panoplosaurini. Nodosaurids tended to have narrower snouts than those seen on the ankylosaurids, which is readily observable on the skulls we have of Edmontonia itself. In most cases, ankylosaurids had tail clubs, while Edmontonia and other nodosaurids lacked them. What this dinosaur did have, however, was a large array of formidable spikes growing on its sides, neck, and especially on the shoulders. The largest spines pointed forwards, sometimes bearing smaller branching projections coming off the main spike. Edmontonia may’ve been able to ram into an attacker with these spines if it had no means of escape. Its dermal armor took on other forms across the top of its neck, back and tail, as rows of flat plates or ridged scutes. Edmontonia had use for such armor, considering it lived with a number of large tyrannosaurs, such as Gorgosaurus, Daspletosaurus or Albertosaurus, depending on the geological formation and region.

Barapasaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria

Overview: While not a particularly well known dinosaur to the average person, Barapasaurus was significant back when it was first described in 1975, representing what was then one of the earliest and most basal confirmed members of the Sauropoda. Basal sauropodomorphs, like Plateosaurus or Massospondylus, had long since been known, but there was a gap in understanding when it came to the early evolutionary history of the true sauropods. We have since found sauropods that were probably even more “primitive” than Barapasaurus, especially if the family Lessemsauridae really did belong to the Sauropoda. Barapasaurus is usually referred to the clade Gravisauria, so it was more derived than Lessemsaurus and its kin in any case. On the other hand, it’s usually, though not always, classified outside the clade Eusauropoda. This made it less derived than sauropod genera like Cetiosaurus. All of this fits well with it having lived during the Early Jurassic.

Barapasaurus had a mix of both “primitive” and “advanced” sauropodomorph traits. For instance, its teeth had stronger serrations, unlike those possessed by later sauropods, as well as more solidly built vertebrae – later sauropods often had more extensive hollow chambers to reduce weight. The creature’s legs were quite robust and column-like in form, at least when compared to those of its earlier relatives. Said legs would inspire its generic name, meaning “big-legged lizard”, formed out of a combination of Bengali and Greek. Having such legs allowed it to reach a decent size, with it being at least twelve meters in length and multiple tons in weight, which was quite large for the Early Jurassic. Some estimates have found it to potentially be even larger, if only slightly. There are a decent number of fossils referred to this animal, of different growth stages, all found within the rock layers of the Kota Formation, today exposed in the central region of India.

Timurlengia

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Pantyrannosauria

Overview: Timurlengia is a genus that is unfortunately based on only limited fossil remains. All of its referred fossils come from the sediments of the Bissekty Formation, in what is now the Central Asian nation of Uzbekistan. The first specimen, consisting of a braincase, was recovered during the 1940’s, when Uzbekistan was a part of the Soviet Union. It wasn’t formally described or referred to a specific genus until 2016, however. Timurlengia was named after the fourteenth century warlord and conqueror Timur (also known as Timurleng or Tamerlane). Timur subjugated most of Central Asia prior to his death, but was originally born in Uzbekistan. When it was described, Timurlengia was also referred to the superfamily Tyrannosauroidea. The braincase, as well as other potential remains belonging to the genus, had a number of traits strongly implying such a classification. The additional fossils included parts of the skull, pieces of jaw bone, and some vertebrae. It’s possible that some of these fossils may not actually belong to Timurlengia, but only time will tell.

Studies of the Bissekty Formation suggest Timurlengia would’ve lived around ninety-two to ninety million years ago. This was about ten million years before the Tyrannosauridae emerged, so it was a fair bit more “primitive” than the infamous Tyrannosaurus itself. It was a pantyrannosaur, usually classified just outside the Eutyrannosauria, so it was also more basal than Dryptosaurus, but more derived than tyrannosauroids like Guanlong or Stokesosaurus. Since much of its skeleton remains a mystery, we have to infer what it would’ve looked like based on this classification. Timurlengia was a medium-sized theropod at best, being about four meters long, though it was more robustly built than earlier tyrannosaurs. It may’ve retained a third digit on its hands, but we can’t be sure. Studies of its braincase suggest it had a very keen sense of hearing, especially in lower frequencies. This is referenced by the name of the type species, Timurlengia euotica, meaning “well-eared”. It mainly hunted small or mid-sized herbivores, still living in the shadow of larger allosauroid predators.

Corythosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Lambeosaurinae > Lambeosaurini

Overview: Corythosaurus is one of the better known examples of the Lambeosaurinae – one of the two major lineages of “duck-billed” hadrosaurids. Lambeosaurines are probably best known for the flamboyant, bony crests they often sported atop their heads or snouts. Corythosaurus possessed such a crest, taking the form of a tall, rounded lobe. The crests of lambeosaurines were usually hollow and interlinked with the animal’s respiratory system, which could imply they used them as resonating chambers to make loud calls. Such vocalizations could’ve been used to alert others in the herd of approaching danger or for courtship purposes. The bony core we see on the fossils are also likely not the full extent of the crest itself. In life, a horn-like coating of keratin probably extended out from it. This keratin may’ve been brightly colored or patterned, which was itself also useful for courtship, to signal health and vitality. Other explanations for both the calls and the form of the crest could’ve included species recognition, as Corythosaurus very likely coexisted with a few other hadrosaurs, including other lamboesaurines like Lambeosaurus itself.

The holotype specimen of Corythosaurus was found in the early 1910’s by the renowned American fossil hunter Barnum Brown, in the Canadian province of Alberta. It consisted of a mostly complete skeleton with associated skin impressions, showing a mosaic of non-overlapping scales. Described in 1914, Brown would name it the “helmeted lizard”, specifically drawing from the name of helmets worn by Corinthian hoplites in Ancient Greece. The name of the species, Corythosaurus casuarius, refers to modern cassowary birds, which have similar head crests. Brown found its remains within the Dinosaur Park Formation, though other specimens would be found in the Oldman Formation, as well as the Judith River Formation in Montana. Corythosaurus lived alongside other dinosaurs such as Lambeosaurus, Parasaurolophus, Euoplocephalus, Edmontonia, Centrosaurus, Chasmosaurus, and a few large tyrannosaurs like Daspletosaurus or Gorgosaurus. Corythosaurus was likely a source of food for the latter genera. It itself would’ve eaten mainly low-level vegetation like ferns or some early flowering plants, though it could also reach low branches by walking on its hind legs.

Eoraptor

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha

Overview: In the early 1990’s, a set of fossils belonging to a small bipedal dinosaur were unearthed in the San Juan Province of Argentina. The discovery was immediately recognized as significant, as the bones came from the famous Ischigualasto Formation, which dates to over two hundred and thirty million years ago, in the Late Triassic, which would automatically make the specimen one of the oldest ever found for a dinosaur. This would be reflected in the animal’s generic name, coined in its 1993 description – Eoraptor, the “dawn thief”. Despite what its name might imply, Eoraptor is not classified close to the “raptor” family Dromaeosauridae. The utilized root word is often used for smaller, presumably agile theropod dinosaurs. Those who described Eoraptor originally saw it as one of the most basal theropod taxa yet discovered, but later studies would challenge this idea. Nowadays, Eoraptor is usually associated with or classified within the Sauropodomorpha, sharing a closer common ancestor with dinosaurs like Plateosaurus or Diplodocus, than with Tyrannosaurus or Velociraptor. Even as such, it was one of the most basal of the sauropodomorphs.

Superficially, there were many theropod-like traits about Eoraptor, but this is likely due to it being closer to the common ancestor of sauropodomorphs and theropods. It would’ve retained a lot of traits from said ancestor that were lost in more derived sauropodomorphs. For instance, its neck, while slightly elongated, wasn’t nearly to the extent of those of its later relatives. The skull, while small, was proportionately larger too. The proposed sauropodomorph-theropod ancestor was, in all likelihood, a carnivore. Based on its teeth, which were differently-shaped throughout its mouth, Eoraptor was probably omnivorous, with herbivory evolving later in the Sauropodomorpha. All of the earliest sauropodomorphs, like Eoraptor, were strictly bipedal. Eoraptor, similar to other early dinosaurs, was quite small. The carnivorous Herrerasaurus is also known from the Ischigualasto and grew to be decently large for its time, but it was far from its region’s apex predator. That title went to the large non-dinosaurian, crocodile-line archosaurs like Saurosuchus, which could grow to be six or seven meters long and were powerfully built terrestrial predators.

Chungkingosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Stegosauria > Huayangosauridae

Overview: Chungkingosaurus was a fairly basal stegosaur, often classified as a close relative of an earlier genus called Huayangosaurus. Both dinosaurs are also often grouped together within a family called the Huayangosauridae, which contained many of the most “primitive” of the stegosaurs yet described. Most of the proposed huayangosaurids, like Chungkingosaurus and Huayangosaurus, are known from China. Chungkingosaurus, like its close relatives, wasn’t nearly as large as some of the more derived stegosaurs like Stegosaurus or Hesperosaurus (classified in the Stegosauridae). It was about four or so meters long, so around the same size as Huayangosaurus. Both dinosaurs sported more robust forelimbs and deeper skulls than those of the stegosaurids. They did differ, however, in a few key ways. While the jaws of Huayangosaurus still retained teeth towards the very front, Chungkingosaurus had lost those teeth, which is common among more derived stegosaurs. Both likely had similar lifestyles, as low-browsing herbivores feeding on ferns and cycads.

Stegosaurs in general are famed for their striking dermal armor, formed out of osteoderms (bones in the skin) that grew in twin rows along the neck, back, and tail. Chungkingosaurus appears to have had narrow, triangular plates along its back and four to six spines on its thagomizer – the array of spikes at the end of a stegosaur’s tail. The latter were probably used for defense or between males when competing for territory or mates, while the former were probably mainly display structures. Other known fossils from Chungkingosaurus include vertebrae, limb bones and part of the pelvis. Chungkingosaurus was first discovered in the 1970’s, near the city of Chongqing, then still a part of Sichuan. Described in 1983, the genus was named in honor of Chongqing, though using a different form of transliteration. Its fossils come from the upper layers of the Shaximiao Formation, while its relative Huayangosaurus comes from deeper within the Shaximiao. Chungkingosaurus may’ve lived alongside dinosaurs such as Tuojiangosaurus, Mamenchisaurus and the fearsome Yangchuanosaurus.

Einiosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Centrosaurinae > Pachyrhinosaurini

Overview: Among the ceratopsids, dinosaurs famed for their bizarre skull ornamentation, that of Einiosaurus is among the most striking. While it lacked brow horns, or at most had small ridges over the eyes, its nasal horn was extremely prominent. It was robust, forward-curving and downward-pointing. The bony core we see on the skull of Einiosaurus probably doesn’t represent the full scale of this horn. In life, it was covered by a sheathe of keratin, extending its length. Einiosaurus, like the rest of the ceratopsids, had a frill of bone extending from the back of the skull. In its case, this was a small, rounded frill with two large openings. The most notable trait of the frill was a pair of long, pointed hornlets that extended from the very top of its rim. Its nasal horn, while large, may’ve been mainly used for display or intraspecific combat between competing males, as its downward curve made it ill suited for defense. The spines on the frill were also likely used mainly for courtship.

Einiosaurus was a medium-sized ceratopsid at maybe four to five meters long, its bulk supported by four strong legs. Most of its food was made up of low-lying vegetation, cropped by its parrot-like beak and sheared by the rows of teeth farther back in the jaws. Within the Ceratopsidae, this genus is classified within the subfamily Centrosaurinae. It was a relative of Centrosaurus itself, but its closest relatives were genera like Pachyrhinosaurus and Styracosaurus. Some scientists suggest Einiosaurus may’ve been an evolutionary transitional form between the earlier Styracosaurus and the more derived Pachyrhinosaurus, though this is contested by others. Fossils of Einiosaurus were first discovered on a Blackfeet Indian reservation in the late 1980’s, leading to it eventually being described as a genus in 1995. Its generic name means “buffalo lizard”; a combination of Greek and the Blackfeet language. Recovered fossils are known from the Two Medicine Formation.

Futalognkosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes > Somphospondyli > Titanosauria > Lithostrotia > Colossosauria > Lognkosauria

Overview: Futalognkosaurus is the namesake of the titanosaurian clade Lognkosauria; considered to be one of the most derived lineages within the Titanosauria. Despite their name, not all of the titanosaurs were gigantic, but quite a few were, many of which belonged to the Lognkosauria. As for Futalognkosaurus itself, it’s a good example of such an animal. Length estimates put it at twenty-eight meters long, with mass estimations usually exceeding fifty standard tons (weight estimates are notoriously difficult from fossils alone). Its relatives Patagotitan and Argentinosaurus appear to have been larger, but Futalognkosaurus was still among the largest known sauropods. Recovered fossils from this animal include most of the neck, spine, rib cage, pelvis, and some of its leg bones. The tail and skull have yet to be described, however. Missing skulls are fairly normal for sauropods, particularly titanosaurs, considering they were so small and fragile relative to the main skeleton. Only a small handful of titanosaur skulls have been discovered and described in detail.

In its general appearance, Futalognkosaurus was quite similar to other titanosaurs, possessing an elongated neck, presumably tiny head, and robust, pillar-like legs. Most of its food was found in the canopies of tall conifers and other such trees. Some titanosaurs possessed simple dermal armor on their backs, which could’ve been present on this genus, though we can’t say for certain. Members of the Lognkosauria, in addition to their size, are also famous for the massive neural spines on their neck vertebrae. These spines were wide and triangular, often compared in shape to the dorsal fin of a shark. This, along with the long cervical ribs that projected behind the vertebrae, were likely adaptations that allowed for such enormous, muscular necks. Futalognkosaurus was officially described as a genus in 2007, its name meaning “giant chieftain lizard”, derived in part from the Mapudungun language, spoken in the part of Argentina where it was found. Fossils are known from the Portezuelo Formation, so it likely lived alongside other dinosaurs such as Megaraptor and Unenlagia.

Ceratosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Ceratosauria > Neoceratosauria > Ceratosauridae

Overview: In 1883, a fossil hunter in the employ of the renowned Othniel C. Marsh discovered the fossilized remains of a decently large theropod. Recovered bones included the skull, much of the neck, spine and tail vertebrae, the shoulder, pelvis, and some limb bones. These remains were sent back east to Marsh, who quickly determined it was a new taxon. In the following year, the genus Ceratosaurus was established. Its name, meaning “horned lizard”, referred to the prominent horn on the animal’s snout, as well as to ridges above the eyes. It would be more accurate to refer to these as crests, as most recent studies have determined they were probably too fragile to be used for anything other than display. The nasal “horn” was tall and blade-like, while the eye ridges were more subtle. In life, keratin probably encases them, increasing their size and possibly bearing some bright colors to catch the eye of a potential mate, or to intimidate rivals. Ceratosaurus acts as the namesake of the clade Ceratosauria, which was an early branching lineage of neotheropods that would later give rise to the abelisaurids like Carnotaurus and Majungasaurus.

Scientists have since described a few other Ceratosaurus specimens. In addition to Marsh’s original type species, C. nasicornis, two other species were later described, but these specimens most likely just represent different growth stages. Ceratosaurus was around six to seven meters long, so it was a medium to large-sized theropod. The legs were short, but strong, while its arms were fairly small, though not to the extent of some later ceratosaurs. Its hands bore four digits, a somewhat “primitive” trait, though the fourth digit was very small. Within the jaws were some notably long, blade-like teeth. Genyodectes from South America, a possible close ceratosaurid relative, also had enormous teeth for its size. Ceratosaurus is known to have lived alongside a couple of other large-bodied theropods, namely Torvosaurus and Allosaurus. All three probably occupied different niches as predators. The long-legged Allosaurus may’ve hunted in open terrain, while Ceratosaurus stalked forested areas. Ceratosaurus is known from the Morrison Formation in the United States, as well as Portugal’s Lourinhã Formation. Potential prey may’ve included Dryosaurus, Camptosaurus and Stegosaurus.

Stegouros

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Parankylosauria

Overview: Stegouros hasn’t been known to science for very long, but its very discovery has proven quite significant. Bones of the animal were reported in 2018, found in the southern region of Chile (part of the larger Patagonian region in South America). Described in 2021, the generic name of this genus means “roofed tail”, taken from the same root word in the name of the famed Stegosaurus. It was chosen in reference to the bony plates that radiated out from the lower half of its tail. This feature was formed by rows of wide, pointed osteoderms, forming a structure informally referred to as a “macuahuitl”, referencing the obsidian studded war clubs used by the Aztecs and other related cultures. Stegouros probably employed it as weapons as well, to strike out at attackers or for driving away competing members of its own species with side-to-side strikes. The latter behavior has strong evidence among some of its ankylosaurian relatives.

Possessing a new style of tail club wasn’t the only notable aspect about Stegouros. The scientists who studied and described its fossils concluded that it belonged to a previously unknown southern lineage of ankylosaurs called the Parankylosauria, also established by them in 2021. Some notable potential members included Antarctopelta, Kunbarrasaurus, Patagopelta, and possibly Minmi. All of these dinosaurs lived in South America, Antarctica or Australia. They were basal ankylosaurs that branched off from their relatives quite early on in the clade’s evolution. Most, like Stegouros itself, were very small by ankylosaur standards. Stegouros was less than two meters long, having an unusually short tail on top of that. Either way, the parankylosaurs weren’t lacking in armor. Bony scutes still grew over their necks, sides, backs, and upper tails. Stegouros fossils are known from the rocks of the Dorotea Formation, meaning it lived fairly late into the Cretaceous Period, around seventy-two million years ago.

Yi

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Scansoriopterygidae

Overview: The full scientific name of this genus’s type species is Yi qi, meaning “strange wing” in Mandarin Chinese. On top of being one of the shortest binomial names of any dinosaur, this was also a very fitting name for this creature – its wings were indeed very bizarre. Wings and wing-like forelimbs were common among maniraptoran dinosaurs, as they were very closely related to birds, often possessing long pennaceous feathers on the lower arms and hands. In birds, these feathers act as the surface enabling flight. Yi, however, had wings that were almost more similar to those of bats. Fossil evidence shows that it had feathers over much of its body, but its wings were formed by membranes stretching from its fingers to the sides of its torso, supported in the middle by a long, rod-like bone extending from the wrist. These membranes probably allowed it to glide from tree to tree, similar to a modern flying squirrel, its long clawed fingers allowing it to scale the sides of tree trunks and branches. Yi was the first dinosaur ever found with such wings, showing us that flight or similar behavior evolved independently and in wildly different forms between dinosaur lineages.

Dinosaurs related to Yi were actually known prior to its 2015 description, but only its holotype was so well preserved at that time, with evidence of its membranous wings. Scansoriopteryx is one such example, originally reconstructed simply with elongated fingers, used to climb. Said genus acts as the namesake of this dinosaur’s family – the Scansoriopterygidae. These tiny and unusual creatures flourished for a brief time in the Middle to Late Jurassic, seemingly only in China. Their phylogeny is debated. Some classify Yi and its kin as close relatives of the Oviraptorosauria, but others find the family to have been closer to true birds, in the clade Paraves, though as basal members. Members of the Scansoriopterygidae usually had tiny, needle-like teeth, suggesting an omnivorous diet of insects, seeds, and other such things. Fossils of Yi are known from China’s Tiaojishan Formation, in what is today the province of Hebei. Fossil preservation in the Tiaojishan is quite remarkable, so it’s little surprise that the type specimen of Yi was found with impressions of its membrane, as well as a set of long, trailing feathers growing out from its short tail.

Haplocanthosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Haplocanthosauridae

Overview: Haplocanthosaurus was a medium-sized sauropod, growing to between fourteen and fifteen meters in length. Known fossils of the animal includes most of its neck vertebrae, most of its spine, the upper portion of the tail, pelvic bones, the shoulder, and some limb bones. No skull has been found. The first of these fossils were found in Colorado, in the late 1890’s, forming the basis for its 1903 description, published by fossil hunter John B. Hatcher. Hatcher originally gave it the name Haplocanthus, meaning “simple-spined”, referring to how its vertebral neural spines were less specialized than those of other sauropods Hatcher had studied (though we now know they were fairly typical). The name Haplocanthus would turn out to be occupied by a fish genus, so the similar name of Haplocanthosaurus was quickly selected as a replacement. Additional fossilized remains were found in the 1950’s, used in 1988 to describe a second species within the genus.

All recovered fossils of Haplocanthosaurus come from the famous Morrison Formation, formed in the Late Jurassic. Haplocanthosaurus is specifically known from its deeper layers, so it may’ve lived somewhat earlier than some other Morrison sauropods (of which there are many). It’s probably one of the more obscure sauropods from the formation. Contemporaries may’ve included an early Brontosaurus species, the stegosaur Hesperosaurus, and a species of Allosaurus. These animals are believed to have inhabited a semi-arid, seasonal river basin. Food sources for Haplocanthosaurus may’ve included ferns, cycads, and conifers. The classification of this dinosaur has been a matter of debate for some years. It was originally seen as a basal sauropod closely related to Cetiosaurus, or later as a relative of Brachiosaurus. Most modern studies place Haplocanthosaurus within the superfamily Diplodocoidea, as an early branching member, possibly within its own family.

Eustreptospondylus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Megalosauroidea (?) > Megalosauridae > Eustreptospondylinae

Overview: Only one fossil specimen of this carnivorous dinosaur has ever been described, consisting of portions of its skull, numerous vertebrae, its pelvis, and some limb bones. These remains came to light in 1870, discovered by workers in a clay pit in Oxfordshire, England. It was a significant find, as it would represent what is to this day one of the most completely known theropod skeletons ever found in the country. In the 1890’s, the fossils were attributed to the genus Megalosaurus, but later in 1905, the remains were instead referred to the poorly known genus Streptospondylus. Research in later decades would prove that the Oxfordshire fossils were actually from an entirely new, distinct genus. Eustreptospondylus was established as such in 1964 by the paleontologist Alick D. Walker. It was named in reference to Streptospondylus, being the “true Streptospondylus”, but the name also refers to the form of its vertebral spines, as it also translates as “well-curved vertebrae”. Studies since have usually placed the genus within the family Megalosauridae, within a subfamily referred to as the Eustreptospondylinae, but some see it as related to the spinosaurids in some way.

The type specimen was between four and five meters long at death, but it doesn’t appear to have been fully grown. Adults were possibly six or more meters in length, so decently large, but far from the largest of theropods. Still, Eustreptospondylus was likely among its region’s top land predators. It likely preyed on small to medium-sized herbivores as well as marine reptiles or fish that washed up along the coast. Eustreptospondylus is known from the Oxford Clay Formation, so it would’ve lived on islands in what was then a warm, shallow sea (much of Europe was submerged). Fossils of another, probably larger theropod called Metriacanthosaurus are also found in the Oxford Clay, as well as those of some sauropods and stegosaurs. Eustreptospondylus likely occupied a different niche than Metriacanthosaurus. The latter probably had relatively deep jaws, while those of this genus were rather narrow and pointed, which were good for snatching up quick and mostly small prey. Fossils of Eustreptospondylus are specifically known from marine deposits, which suggests to some it swam from island to island, but others maintain it was merely swept out to sea.

Gigantspinosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Stegosauria > Huayangosauridae (?)

Overview: In most aspects, Gigantspinosaurus was a fairly typical stegosaur, possessing a tiny head, a sturdy body on four legs, rows of plates running down its back, and a spiked tail. What set it apart, however, was its shoulder spines. Shoulder spines in and of themselves weren’t unique among the Stegosauria, with many genera possessing them. Those of this dinosaur, however, stand out due to their enormous size. Said spines could measure up to a meter in length on a main body that grew to be maybe four or so meters long. They were robust, pointed and curved backwards. Described in 1992, Gigantspinosaurus was obviously named for its shoulder spikes. There were a handful of other stegosaurs with similarly huge spines, but this genus was the first known to have had such an exaggerated set. These spines were probably used either for defensive or courtship purposes. The plates on its back were generally unremarkable, being fairly small and narrow in form.

While shoulder spikes appear among a few different proposed stegosaurian lineages, the trait has often been seen as fairly “primitive”. The classification of Gigantspinosaurus itself has been hard to determine. It’s generally accepted as a basal stegosaur, often seen as more derived than genera like Huayangosaurus or Chungkingosaurus, which belonged to the family Huayangosauridae. There are some studies, however, that classify Gigantspinosaurus itself as a huayangosaurid. Fossils of the genus come from the upper layers of the Shaximiao Formation, in the Sichuan Province of China. It was at first mistaken for Tuojiangosaurus, though its shoulder spines quickly proved it was distinct. The two stegosaurs may’ve coexisted, perhaps occupying slightly different niches. Other dinosaurs in the region at that time included the large sauropod Mamenchisaurus and Yangchuanosaurus – a large metriacanthosaurid allosauroid and likely the top predator of the Shaximiao environment.

Diplodocus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Diplodocidae > Diplodocinae

Overview: In the 1870’s, the bitter rivalry between American paleontologists Othniel C. Marsh and Edward D. Cope, also known as the “Bone Wars”, was heating up. The two scientists sent teams of fossil hunters into the western United States in search of fossils. In the end, Marsh would describe and name considerably more still valid taxa, Diplodocus among them. Fossils of this sauropod were first unearthed in 1877, with a description of the find coming the following year. The generic name of Diplodocus means “double-beamed”, referring to the chevron bones on the bottom surface of its tail vertebrae. These were double-pronged in form, which at the time was new to Marsh, but in later decades, other sauropods were found with such chevrons. Marsh’s type species, Diplodocus longus, is often seen as dubious today, since it’s based on fairly limited remains. However, a large number of Diplodocus fossils would later be found, including those of other species, most notably Diplodocus carnegii, based on far more complete fossils. Said species, described in 1901, honors the industrialist Andrew Carnegie, who sponsored numerous paleontological expeditions.

With the large number of Diplodocus specimens known, it’s little wonder it would go onto become one of the more well known sauropods to the general public. Numerous mounted skeletons can be found in museums, many of them sent out across the world by Carnegie himself. Its basic anatomy and appearance are well understood. Diplodocus was a long and slender-built sauropod, sporting both an elongated neck and tail. The distal end of the tail grew narrow, like a whip, which some see as a potential weapon to lash out at attacking predators. No skull material has been found, but we have skulls from its close relatives. Its skull was probably relatively small with a narrow snout, the jaws tipped with elongated, pencil-like teeth. Such teeth were better suited for stripping branches of leaves and needles than they were for chewing. Food was mainly processed in the gut, largely by swallowed stones, or gastrolithes. How it held its neck has been debated. Some studies suggest its neck was held mostly out straight from the shoulders, but others find it would’ve held its neck up fairly high.

Diplodocus averaged around twenty-five to twenty-six meters long as an adult. For a long time, the genus was cited as the longest known dinosaur. One species, Diplodocus hallorum, reached lengths of over thirty meters. In the 1990’s, fossils of D. hallorum were used as the basis for a genus called Seismosaurus, but it was later recognized as a junior synonym of Diplodocus. Even with its great potential length, however, Diplodocus was surprisingly lightly built. It was only a fraction of the weight of similarly-long sauropods due to its gracile build. Many of its relatives were also similar, with Diplodocus acting as the namesake of its family – the Diplodocidae. Diplodocids particularly close to it were in the subfamily Diplodocinae, like Barosaurus and Supersaurus, while genera like Apatosaurus and its relative Brontosaurus belonged to the more distantly related subfamily Apatosaurinae (which were usually slightly bulkier animals). Diplodocus is known from the Morrison Formation, dating it to the Late Jurassic. It lived in a semi-arid, seasonal environment feeding on conifers and similar trees. In this same region were famous dinosaurs like Brachiosaurus, Stegosaurus and Allosaurus.

Lanzhousaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna

Overview: Fossils attributed to this herbivore come from the Hekou Group, or a series of geological formations exposed in the Gansu Province of northwestern China. Studies of the Hekou suggest it’s most accurately dated to the Early Cretaceous. Recovered fossils included parts of the jaws, teeth, vertebrae, and parts of the pelvis, originally unearthed in the early 2000’s. Lanzhousaurus was given its scientific name in 2005, referencing the city of Lanzhou, located close to where the fossils were first reported. Other dinosaur fossils have been recovered from the Hekou Group, including those of some large sauropods and a few armored dinosaurs (both ankylosaurs and stegosaurs). All were likely occupying different ecological niches from one another. The latter group probably subsisted on low-level plants, the sauropods from tree branches, and Lanzhousaurus from a mix of both.

Lanzhousaurus is confidently classified as a member of the ornithopod clade Iguanodontia. It had a lot in common, appearance-wise, with Iguanodon itself. It was a sturdily built creature that walked both on all fours and as a biped. Many similar dinosaurs, including Iguanodon, sported thumb spikes, but we can’t be sure if Lanzhousaurus itself possessed them. Studies usually find Lanzhousaurus to have been less derived than Iguanodon, falling just outside the clade Hadrosauriformes. It appears to have been a decently large ornithopod, with suggested length estimates of nine or ten meters. Its most notable trait was its dentition. Iguanodonts often had impressive arrays of grinding teeth, but the teeth of Lanzhousaurus are notable for being among the largest of any herbivorous dinosaur. The jaws themselves were fairly robust, suggesting it could bite through very tough and woody plants.

Crittendenceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Centrosaurinae > Nasutoceratopsini

Overview: Crittendenceratops takes part of its name from the Fort Crittenden Formation, where it was originally discovered, in the state of Arizona. Geologists date the Fort Crittenden to the Late Cretaceous, specifically around seventy-three million years ago. Crittendenceratops likely lived in a seasonal, coastal floodplain dotted by lakes and marshes. Studies suggest this environment would be subjected to periods of markedly dryer weather with lower water levels and wildfires. Wildfires, of course, were conducive to renewed plant growth in their aftermath, which would’ve been a boon to a low-browsing herbivore like Crittendenceratops. It remains the only novel genus to be fully described from the Fort Crittenden, though other dinosaur fossils have been found within the same rock layers, as well as the remains of crocodilians, turtles, lizards, and fish.

Phylogenetically, Crittendenceratops falls within the ceratopsid subfamily Centrosaurinae. Most of the centrosaurines had longer nasal horns and short brow horns, but this wasn’t universally true. In the case of Crittendenceratops, it specifically belonged to the tribe Nasutoceratopsini, named for its best known member – Nasutoceratops. These were early diverging, fairly basal centrosaurines that usually had long, curving brow horns like those of a bull, but no nasal horn. Nasutoceratopsins also tended to have remarkably deep snouts and large nasal openings. Most members of this tribe were also quite small by ceratopsid standards. Crittendenceratops itself only grew to maybe three or four meters long. As a ceratopsid, however, it was still a bulky animal. Predators would’ve had a tough time killing an adult, save for the largest of theropods or some river-dwelling crocodilians.

Mapusaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Carnosauria > Allosauroidea > Carcharodontosauria > Carcharodontosauridae > Carcharodontosaurinae > Giganotosaurini

Overview: Closely related to the infamous Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus was a theropod nearly as large from the same general region of Argentina. Mapusaurus came from somewhat younger rock layers, within the Huincul Formation, as opposed to Giganotosaurus in the Candeleros Formation. Phylogenetic studies classify these two dinosaurs within the family Carcharodontosauridae, which made them derived members of the allosauroid superfamily. Specifically, Mapusaurus is referred to the tribe Giganotosaurini. Tyrannotitan is another notable member of this group, though it lived at least ten million years earlier than Mapusaurus. Some of the largest theropods known to science belonged to the Giganotosaurini. Mapusaurus itself grew to be ten to twelve meters in length and half a dozen standard tons in weight, at the very least. Mapusaurus and its kin had enormous skulls and short, but powerful arms, each hand equipped with three prominent claws. Along the snout of these animals were often low ridges of bone, which were quite prominent on Mapusaurus. In life, these may’ve been coated in keratin, further extending them and possibly bearing bright colors.

We can be fairly confident that Mapusaurus was the top land predator of its local environment, in the same way Giganotosaurus had been a few million years prior. The two can be distinguished by a few minor traits. Mapusaurus tended to have a shorter snout and somewhat taller neural spines on its vertebrae, for instance. Size estimates between the two are very close, though Mapusaurus was on average somewhat smaller. It coexisted with the massive sauropod Argentinosaurus, which may’ve been a food source, though fully grown adults would’ve been a challenge to bring down. In some cases, Mapusaurus skeletons have been found next to each other, which could imply it lived or even hunted in groups, which could’ve allowed it to tackle such large prey. Mapusaurus was first described as a genus in 2006, taking part of its name, meaning “earth lizard”, from the language of the local Mapuche people. The specific name of the type species, Mapusaurus roseae, combines with the generic name in reference to how it was found, encases in rose-colored sediments. This dinosaur is based on a decent number of individual skeletons of different growth stages.

Ornithopsis

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Macronaria > Titanosauriformes

Overview: Ornithopsis has a somewhat confusing history of study, which is to be expected from a dinosaur based on a fossil first described in the early nineteenth century. The bit of bone was first described in the 1830’s by Gideon Mantell, who had earlier described the genus Iguanodon. Mantell would conclude the bone came from the back of the skull, referring it to Iguanodon. Two decades later, another study would affirm Mantell’s conclusion, but the researcher Harry G. Seeley would go on to refute it in the 1870’s. Seeley recognized the fossil as part of a vertebrae, also noting it possessed hollow chambers throughout, similar to those of birds. Described by Seeley in 1870, the generic name of Ornithopsis literally means “birdlike”, in reference to this trait. Seeley thought it was related to birds or pterosaurs, but it was later confirmed to be a sauropod dinosaur. Studies afterward would find it to be a junior synonym of either Bothriospondylus or Chondrosteosaurus.

Chondrosteosaurus and Bothriospondylus were genera described on quite limited fossils, with both being treated as dubious today by most researchers. The genus Ornithopsis, however, seems to be a distinct and valid taxon, its remains having some diagnostic features. Other additional fossils are thought to belong to Ornithopsis, though only one species is usually seen as valid – Ornithopsis hulkei. Most come from England, but fossils in mainland Europe may also belong to it. Modern studies tend to classify Ornithopsis as a macronarian sauropod, probably in the clade Titanosauriformes. It grew to be about fifteen or sixteen meters long, so it was a medium-sized sauropod. The hollow spaces in its vertebrae were filled with a system of air sacs in life, which lightened its weight, but were also linked with its respiratory system, similar to those seen in actual birds. Ornithopsis is known from the Wessex Formation, so it likely had to contend with predators like Neovenator.

Stegosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Stegosauria > Stegosauridae > Stegosaurinae

Overview: With its double row of kite-shaped plates and its imposing spiked tail, few dinosaurs are as immediately recognizable as Stegosaurus. It’s one of the many dinosaurs described by the famed Othniel C. Marsh – one of the main competitors of the infamous “Bone Wars”. Marsh established Stegosaurus as a genus in 1877, based on a disarticulated partial skeleton. Its generic name means “roofed lizard”, referring to its dorsal plates, which Marsh originally believed laid over its back like shingles, similar to what we see on modern pangolins. It was later recognized that the plates stood erect on the back, though their pattern has been the subject of debate. Some originally thought it had only one row of plates, but we know there were two. In some reconstructions, the plates are paired, but most now agree the two rows ran in a staggered pattern. Stegosaurs often sported a set of spikes on the end of the tail, forming what is often called a “thagomizer”. The spike number varied from genus to genus, but Stegosaurus is usually reconstructed with four spines, pointing out and back, as opposed to pointing up like in some reconstructions or artistic depictions.

Researchers have debated the purpose of the plates and thagomizer. The latter was probably used as a defense against predators. Damage to the pelvic bone of an Allosaurus specimen is likely from an ill fated encounter with a Stegosaurus. The plates have often been seen as defensive structures, but they were situated so far up on the body that they weren’t really much use as such. Instead, it’s likely that they were used to make the animal look larger and more intimidating, or for display. The keratinous coating over the bone may’ve sported striking patterns to catch the eye of the opposite sex. Heat exchange is another potential purpose. Some have speculated that Stegosaurus was able to pump blood into the plates to make them flush, as can be seen in the 1999 BBC documentary series Walking with Dinosaurs, but the discovery of the keratin coating makes this unlikely. One of the most popular misconceptions about Stegosaurus is that it had a second brain in its pelvis. The pelvic region did have an open space, but it probably held a mass to store glycogen to supply the nervous system. Its actual brain was small, but not so tiny as to require a second brain to survive.

Stegosaurus was a primarily low-browsing herbivore, eating plants like ferns and cycads, but some believe it could rear up on its tail to reach into low-hanging branches. Given its size, it was probably able to push down smaller trees. The creature’s snout was long and narrow, the head being notably small for its body size. Stegosaurs tended to have such tiny heads. At the snout tip was a beak, but smaller, leaf-shaped teeth lined the back of the jaws. Stegosaurus is the namesake of its family, the Stegosauridae, as well as the larger thyreophoran clade Stegosauria. Its closest relatives may’ve been genera like Hesperosaurus and Wuerhosaurus. With a length of seven or even eight meters, it was one of the largest known stegosaurs, with only Europe’s Dacentrurus surpassing it. All known fossils of Stegosaurus come from either the Morrison Formation in the United States or Portugal’s Lourinhã Formation. Most are known from the Morrison, which preserves what was then a semi-arid, seasonal floodplain of fern savannas and conifer forests. Stegosaurus lived alongside many famous dinosaurs such as Dryosaurus, Camarasaurus, Brachiosaurus, Diplodocus, Ceratosaurus and Allosaurus.

Lurdusaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna

Overview: Lurdusaurus lived in a hot, humid environment surrounded by a landscape of tropical foliage, winding river systems, deltas, and wetlands. This same region today, located in Niger, is a barren desert – considerably different than it was over a hundred and ten million years ago. The specific rocks that contain traces of this lost environment, as well as the bones of Lurdusaurus, is a part of the Elrhaz Formation. Other notable dinosaurs from this formation included the iguanodont Ouranosaurus, the odd sauropod Nigersaurus, and the spinosaurid Suchomimus. Fossil remains of a wide array of non-dinosaurian animals are also known, including those of fish, pterosaurs, turtles, and various crocodyliforms (more basal relatives of true crocodiles). Among the latter group was a massive genus called Sarcosuchus, which was probably the top predator in the region’s waterways.

Fossils of Lurdusaurus were first recovered from Niger in the mid-1960’s by French paleontologists, consisting of a decently complete specimen. However, it wouldn’t be properly described as its own genus until 1999. The generic name of Lurdusaurus means “heavy lizard”, which is very appropriate for this animal. Lurdusaurus grew to be about eight to nine meters in length, which alone is quite a decent size for an iguanodont of its time, but it was significantly heavier than other related taxa in this length range. The body was bulky and rotund, supported by relatively short, but strong limbs. It may’ve retained the ability to rear up on its hind legs, like other ornithopods. One notable trait of its feet was its wide-splayed toes, which made walking on wet surfaces easier. Some believe that Lurdusaurus was semi-aquatic like modern hippos, but such a lifestyle is still speculative.

Beipiaosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Therizinosauria > Therizinosauroidea

Overview: Therizinosaurs were among the most bizarre of the theropod lineages. Members tended to be semi-upright in their posture, had enlarged fourth toes, enormous arms, sickle-shaped claws and, for the most part, were entirely herbivorous. Beipiaosaurus itself belonged to this unusual lineage, being one of the earlier confirmed therizinosaurs. It belonged to the superfamily Therizinosauroidea, which made it more derived than some earlier therizinosaurs, such as Falcarius, but it fell outside the family Therizinosauridae. Therizinosaurids were more derived and usually larger than Beipiaosaurus, tending to have the most exaggerated of the above listed features. Its posture wasn’t as upright, the neck a bit shorter, its head proportionately larger, and its overall body size was smaller. However, it did possess the long arms, enlarged claws and herbivorous diet of its later relatives.

Beipiaosaurus lived in the Early Cretaceous, in what is now the northeast of China. This region had a temperate or at most subtropical climate at that time, with landscapes of dense woodlands and lakes, dotted by active volcanoes. Beipiaosaurus ate mostly low to mid-level vegetation, using its long claws to manipulate branches, but also to defend itself against attackers. Fossils of the animal were first recovered in the mid-1990’s, from the famed Yixian Formation. Like many fossils found in the Yixian, its holotype specimen preserved extensive feather impressions (volcanic sediments are good for preserving such features). Prior to the discovery of Yutyrannus, Beipiaosaurus was for a time the largest dinosaur known with certainty to have had feathers. In its case, these were fairly basic, hair or ribbon-like proto-feathers, which would’ve been useful for insulating its body. Described in 1999, its name refers to the Chinese city of Beipiao.

Demandasaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Rebbachisauridae > Rebbachisaurinae

Overview: Growing to be about twelve meters in length, Demandasaurus was medium-sized by the standards of the Sauropoda overall, but quite average for those in the rebbachisaurid family. Those dinosaurs belonging to this group were distinguished by a few noteworthy traits, foremost being their tall neural spines along most of their backs. In life, these spines probably supported a ridge of fat, muscle or other such tissue. We can observe these spines on Demandasaurus itself, specifically on those preserved on some of its upper tail vertebrae. Some other referred fossils of the animal are its femur, part of the pelvis, some ribs, and a few other vertebrae from the spine and neck. Parts of the snout, specifically the tip, are also known. These fossils paint it as a typical rebbachisaurid, but with a notably rounded snout profile, especially when compared to that of the related Nigersaurus, which had far more specialized jaws.

Rebbachisaurids often coexisted with other sauropods, likely occupying different niches. With very few exceptions, they were usually not the largest in their environments, so they fed mainly on low to mid-level vegetation. This included conifers, cycads, and similar plants. Demandasaurus itself is believed to have coexisted with the sauropod Europatitan, which was considerably larger and a part of the lineage that gave rise to the titanosaurs (though not a titanosaur itself). Fossils of both are known from the Castrillo de la Reina Formation, in what is today the north of Spain. Studies of the formation date it to the Early Cretaceous, or around one hundred and twenty-five million years ago. Other dinosaurs from the formation included iguanodontian ornithopods and some spinosaurids. Demandasaurus takes its name from Spain’s Demanda mountain range.

Massospondylus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Massospondylidae

Overview: Massospondylus is one of the more famous of the “prosauropods” – a basal member of the Sauropodomorpha – along with dinosaurs like Plateosaurus. Between the two, this genus was more derived, being a part of the clade Massopoda. Massospondylus is the namesake of the family Massospondylidae, which also contained genera like Glacialisaurus and Coloradisaurus. They were mostly lightly built and not overly large sauropodomorphs, at least in comparison to their later kin. Members of the family, as we can see with Massospondylus itself, tended to have tiny skulls, jaws lined with very simple teeth, and large hand claws. Although some older restorations depicted them as capable of walking on all fours, the massospondylids were strictly bipedal creatures, their wrists being unable to pronate downwards to support their weight. Massospondylus likely used its claws to forage for food by digging up roots or pulling branches, but also for defense against predators.

Two other generic names are associated with this genus – Pachyspondylus and Leptospondylus. All three generic names were coined by the English naturalist Sir Richard Owen in 1854, based on a set of fossils sent to him from South Africa. Owen believed the bones came from different animals, but in time, it was proven they were all the same genus, with Massospondylus winning out as the valid name. Its name, meaning “massive vertebrae”, refers to its vertebrae being rather long in profile. In his original description, Owen didn’t recognize Massospondylus as a dinosaur, though he himself was the scientist who established them as a clade. He saw it as some kind of carnivorous reptile, but we know today that Massospondylus was strictly herbivorous. Massospondylus fossils can be found in various different Early Jurassic-aged geological formations in southern Africa. It probably coexisted with other notable dinosaurs such as Heterodontosaurus and Megapnosaurus.

Velociraptor

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Dromaeosauridae > Eudromaeosauria > Velociraptorinae

Overview: Were it not for the Jurassic Park franchise, Velociraptor would probably be a rather obscure dinosaur. American fossil hunters first recovered its remains in the early 1920’s, in what is now the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. They were sent to the American Museum of Natural History for study, where the renowned Henry F. Osborn used them as the basis for a new genus and species – Velociraptor mongoliensis. Its generic name is Latin for “swift thief” or “swift plunderer”, referring to it having been a relatively agile dinosaur, which seemed obvious to Osborn, even in 1924. The type species was named for Mongolia, its nation of origin. At that time, Osborn only had a crushed skull, a claw, and a few toe bones to work with, but far more complete specimens would be recovered in the decades to come. Many of these would be found by Soviet and Polish fossil hunters. Mongolia was a communist state for most of the twentieth century, so western paleontologists were banned from entering the country and prospecting among its many fossil-riche sites. Velociraptor itself has mainly been found in the Djadochta and Bayan Mandahu Formations, and possibly in the Nemegt.

Unlike its famous film counterpart, the actual Velociraptor stood nowhere near as tall as a man. It was generally about as tall as or slightly more so than a person’s knee, with a length of two meters – fairly average for a member of its family. The jaws were long and narrow, the snout having a slight upward curve. Along the jaws were many finely serrated, blade-like teeth. Its hands appear to have been well adapted for grasping, aided by three hooked claws. Velociraptor, like other “raptor” dinosaurs in the dromaeosaurid family, possessed enlarged talons on the second toe of each foot, used to hook into and grip its prey as it attacked with its jaws. Much of its food probably consisted of smaller animals, but direct fossil evidence shows us it went after animals its own size or even larger. One specimen, the famous “Fighting Dinosaurs” specimen, preserved this animal in a death struggle with an adult Protoceratops. The two appear to have been rapidly buried by a sudden sandstorm or a collapsing dune. Studies of the Djadochta in particular reveal that the region was quite similar to the modern Gobi at that time, being very arid with mostly seasonal streams or lakes.

Velociraptor, as a member of the family Dromaeosauridae, belonged to the clade Maniraptora, so it was fairly closely related to modern birds. It’s specifically classified within a subfamily known as the Velociraptorinae, for which it’s the namesake. Velociraptorines were generally quite similar to Velociraptor itself, tending to be average-sized and mostly slender-built dromaeosaurids, usually possessing narrow snouts. As it was a maniraptoran dinosaur, we’d generally expect Velociraptor to have been feathered in life. Strong fossil evidence shows us this was almost certainly true. Many of its close relatives have been found with preserved feather impressions. Even more notable, one specimen of Velociraptor itself has been found with traces of quill knobs on its lower arm bones, taking the form of tiny, evenly-spaced bumps along the ulna – anchor points for veined feathers. Unable to fly with these feathers, they could’ve been used for insulation, to give it a boost when going up steep terrain, or to help maintain its balance when on top of its prey. As for its behavior in life, there’s limited evidence at best it was a pack hunter, never being found alongside others of its species.

Brachylophosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Saurolophinae > Brachylophosaurini

Overview: Hadrosaur head crests could vary widely in form between the two major subfamilies in the Hadrosauridae. The most extravagant were on those in the lambeosaurine lineage, examples including Parasaurolophus or Corythosaurus, but there were some notable crested members of the saurolophine lineage as well. One of these was Brachylophosaurus, the “short-crested lizard”. Just as its name would imply, the crest of this animal was modest and easy to overlook at a glance. The crest was formed out of the creature’s nasal bone, like those of most hadrosaurs, in its case taking the form of a flat, paddle or tongue-like crest over the top of the head. This may’ve been the base of a larger crest made of keratin or soft tissue, or possibly acted as a surface for competing males to engage in shoving matches during mating season or over territory.

Brachylophosaurus is the namesake of the tribe Brachylophosaurini, which also included slightly famous dinosaur genera like Probrachylophosaurus and Maiasaura. Similar head crests could be seen on these animals, though they often took on slightly different forms. In terms of its overall appearance, Brachylophosaurus was a typical hadrosaurid, being a sturdily built animal that was able to walk both as a quadruped and biped. The front of its snout was equipped with a keratinous beak, while grinding teeth lined the back of its jaws. The general anatomy of Brachylophosaurus is well understood, being based on some very complete fossils, including “mummified” specimens that preserve impressions of skin and soft tissue in the surrounding rock. Brachylophosaurus likely had to contend with large tyrannosaurid predators like Daspletosaurus or Gorgosaurus.

Megaraptor

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea (?) > Megaraptora > Megaraptoridae

Overview: In the mid-1990’s, a team of Argentine paleontologists came across the partial remains of a decently large theropod dinosaur, previously unknown to science. The recovered fossils would include bits of the arms, hands, and feet, but most notably, a gigantic claw measuring about thirty-five centimeters in length (fourteen inches). Argentine researcher Fernando E. Novas described the remains in 1998, assigning the generic name of Megaraptor, or “large thief”. The name was chosen in reference to the Dromaeosauridae, the infamous “raptor” family containing well known dinosaurs like Deinonychus and Velociraptor, and to its comparative larger size. Novas didn’t assign it to the Dromaeosauridae specifically, but he thought his new genus was related to them in some way, sharing a common ancestor. If it were a dromaeosaurid, then Megaraptor would easily be the largest known member of the family, growing to be up to eight meters in length. Earlier depictions of Megaraptor draw on its supposed link to the dromaeosaurids, with the large, sickle-shaped claw being placed on its second toe – a common trait of Velociraptor and its kin

The discovery of more complete fossils of Megaraptor and of its close relatives would prove that it wasn’t closely related to the dromaeosaurids, but a member of an entirely separate lineage known as the Megaraptora and, more specifically, the family Megaraptoridae. Notable members included Australovenator and Tratayenia. The supposed toe claw was actually affixed to one of its fingers. Megaraptorans tended to have proportionately long and muscular arms, their claws being the main killing implement for these predators. Their jaws were comparatively weak, long and slender. Being lightly built for their size, megaraptorans were probably surprisingly agile. Debate surrounds exactly how Megaraptor and its kin should be classified. Some older studies have placed them close to the genus Neovenator, in the allosauroid superfamily, but more recent studies have found them to be a part of the Coelurosauria, so closer to birds. They may’ve been a lineage of tyrannosauroids, but this is uncertain. Fossils of Megaraptor are known from Argentina’s Portezuelo Formation, so it lived in a seasonal floodplain alongside other dinosaurs like Unenlagia and the giant Futalognkosaurus.

Hungarosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae > Struthiosaurinae

Overview: Hungarosaurus was a medium-sized ankylosaur that once inhabited what is now Eastern Europe, around eighty-five million years ago. Fossils were first recovered in the mid-2000’s, secured from the rocks of Hungary’s Csehbánya Formation. Hungarosaurus, of course, was named after its nation of origin in its 2005 description. Since then, at least three other specimens have been found and described, consisting of most of the animal’s skeleton when put together, making it one of the best understood ankylosaurs ever found in Europe. Among the bones recovered were a myriad of bony scutes, or osteoderms, forming the animal’s dermal armor. This armor covered a large swath of its body, shielding it from all but the most powerful of predators. Only the animal’s underbelly was unshielded. Over its shoulders and neck, Hungarosaurus sported a set of fairly large spines.

Most studies classify Hungarosaurus as a member of the family Nodosauridae, specifically within a tribe of nodosaurids called the Struthiosaurini. Most members of this clade, such as Struthiosaurus itself, are known from Europe. Like other nodosaurids, the struthiosaurins lacked bony tail clubs, but made up for it with their spiked shoulders or sides. Their snouts were usually narrow, which is a potential sign of a more selective diet. Hungarosaurus and its struthiosaurin relatives often possessed slightly longer legs than other nodosaurids, but were usually fairly small. Hungarosaurus, along with Europelta, were decently large. Some restorations of Hungarosaurus depict it as being fairly tall at the shoulders, which were certainly robust based on what we know of the bones there. The region where this dinosaur lived was a fairly humid, swampy island.

Agilisaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia

Overview: Agilisaurus was a relatively small and obscure herbivorous dinosaur that lived in what is now southern China, back in the Middle Jurassic. Length estimates put it about two meters long. Its build was light and slender, which combined with it being a biped, probably implies it could move at a decent speed. Agilisaurus, the “agile lizard”, was named for this inference. Without armor or horns, the only real means of defense it had was either evasion or camouflage. Agilisaurus was likely a source of food for many theropods in its environment. This could’ve included the medium-sized theropod Gasosaurus or possibly the far larger Yangchuanosaurus, though the latter is usually found within geologically younger sediments. Agilisaurus coexisted with other herbivorous dinosaur as well. This may’ve included the stegosaur Huayangosaurus or the fairly basal sauropod Shunosaurus.

Researchers can’t agree on how Agilisaurus should be classified. Most suggest that it belonged to the clade Neornithischia, which was a broad group that contained the lineage leading to “duck-billed” dinosaurs, and the lineage from which the horned ceratopsians evolved. Armored dinosaurs like the stegosaurs and ankylosaurs are excluded from the Neornithischia. It’s possible that Agilisaurus had some form of bristle or fur-like proto-feathers, like some other neornithischians. Some researchers place Agilisaurus close to the ceratopsians and pachycephalosaurs, but this is debated. Agilisaurus fossils were first recovered back in the 1980’s, in the Chinese province of Sichuan. All known fossils come from the lower levels of the Shaximiao Formation. One specimen is known, though it’s quite well preserved and nearly complete, in spite of the confusion surrounding its exact phylogeny.

Rugops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Ceratosauria > Neoceratosauria > Abelisauroidea > Abelisauridae

Overview: North Africa, some ninety-five million years ago, was one of the most dangerous regions on the planet, being home to a wide array of large and powerful theropod dinosaurs. Some of the region’s top predators included Carcharodontosaurus and Spinosaurus, but there were a number of somewhat smaller, mid-tier predators too. Rugops was one such theropod, measuring around five meters in length. It likely preyed upon smaller animals, including the young of other dinosaurs, but it also likely scavenged carcasses. The surrounding environment was relatively lush, supporting an array of different herbivores, dinosaurian and non-dinosaurian. Sauropods such as Rebbachisaurus and Aegyptosaurus were present in this environment, though adults were far too large to be preyed on by Rugops. Carcharodontosaurus and its kin were the main threat to sauropods.

Rugops was formally described as a genus in 2004, based on a decently preserved skull, discovered in the Echkar Formation of Niger. To this day, this original holotype remains the only specimen ever found of this dinosaur, but we have enough to get a decent idea as to what it was. Paleontologists classify Rugops as a ceratosaur, specifically within the family Abelisauridae. Based on this, we can make inferences as to what Rugops would’ve looked like. Abelisaurids tended to have remarkably tiny, almost useless arms and short, but deep jaws. The latter trait is readily visible on the described material. Also visible is a bumpy, wrinkled texture of bone running over its snout, which inspired the creature’s generic name, meaning “wrinkled face”. This surface is thought to have supported some kind of keratinous covering in life, possibly for display purposes or for added protection across the head.

Lufengosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Massospondylidae

Overview: Basal sauropodomorphs, informally known as “prosauropods”, are often hard to tell apart at a glance. The earliest members were somewhat theropod-like in form, while more derived taxa were more similar to true sauropods, but those in the middle often looked alike. There are a few traits that can be used to distinguish separate lineages, however. With its slender form and its very tiny skull, Lufengosaurus can be pretty confidently placed within the family Massospondylidae, though it’s sometimes associated with the plateosaurids in older studies. Massospondylids thrived in a few different regions around the world during the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. The family’s namesake, Massospondylus, lived in southern Africa, while others are known from the Americas. Compared to Massospondylus, Lufengosaurus was notably larger, being among the largest genera in the family. In comparison to later sauropodomorphs, however, it was relatively small.

Similar to other massospondylids, or basal sauropodomorphs in general, Lufengosaurus was a fully bipedal animal, its wrists not being adapted for bearing weight. This left its hands, and its claws, free for foraging and defense. “Prosauropods” generally had relatively simple teeth, shaped in a way that was suitable for a mostly or entirely herbivorous diet. Lufengosaurus would’ve lived on plants like ferns, horsetails, cycads, and conifers. It itself would’ve been a source of food for dinosaurs like Sinosaurus – a medium-sized, crested theropod similar in appearance to Dilophosaurus. Remains of both dinosaurs are known from China’s Lufeng Formation, in the southern province of Yunnan. This formation, as well as Lufengosaurus itself, are named after the nearby city of Lufeng. The first fossils of this dinosaur were found near there in the 1930’s, upon which the genus was based in its 1940 description, published by the renowned Yang Zhongjian (C. C. Young).

Maiasaura

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Saurolophinae > Brachylophosaurini

Overview: In the late 1970’s, at a site later called “Egg Mountain” in Montana, fossil hunters came across a remarkable bone bed. Among the fossils recovered were those of a fairly large “duck-bill”, or hadrosaurid dinosaur, which was recognized as a genus new to science. Maiasaura was officially described as such in 1979 by paleontologists John “Jack” R. Horner and Robert R. Makela. Its name, meaning “good mother lizard”, refers to another, more remarkable find made at “Egg Mountain” – a massive nesting site. Multiple nests full of egg clutches were found at the site, along with remains of hatchlings and juvenile Maiasaura. Maiasaura was named the “good mother lizard” in reference to strong evidence that the parents of these young specimens and eggs were actively attentive and invested in their offspring. Traces of vegetation that were placed around eggs to insulate them are observable and the fact that some juveniles, even a while after hatching, were still present at the nesting site reveals that they were being cared for and, most likely, would later join large herds.

Maiasaura is significant as one of the first non-avian dinosaurs found with undisputed evidence of parental care for their young. To be more accurate, it was the first to be recognized as such. Fossils of oviraptorids brooding over their nests had been found decades prior, though researchers would mistake this as evidence of preying on the nests of other animals. Parental care, on top of famously occurring in modern birds, is actually fairly widespread among some archosaurs. Crocodilians are also known to care for their young to some degree. In adulthood, Maiasaura was similar to most of its hadrosaur kin, being a mostly low-browsing herbivore with strong, grinding teeth. The animal’s skull was large and rectangular in shape, bearing a small crest just in front of the eyes, possibly used for visual display. Maiasaura belonged to the hadrosaurid subfamily Saurolophinae, and specifically, to the tribe Brachylophosaurini. Fossils are known from the Two Medicine and Oldman Formations, so it probably had to contend with predatory dinosaurs like Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus.

Apatosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Neosauropoda > Diplodocoidea > Diplodocidae > Apatosaurinae

Overview: Apatosaurus is but one of many large sauropod dinosaurs known from North America’s famous Morrison Formation. Other notable Morrison sauropods include genera like Camarasaurus, Brachiosaurus, Diplodocus, and Barosaurus. Apatosaurus was closely related to the latter two taxa, as a fellow member of the family Diplodocidae. Diplodocids often grew to remarkable lengths, but tended to be surprisingly lightly built. This was true for Apatosaurus to some extent, but it was much bulkier than either Barosaurus or Diplodocus, with a notably thicker neck, stockier limbs, and rather robust vertebrae. These traits appear to have been common to diplodocids within the subfamily to which Apatosaurus belonged – the Apatosaurinae. Diplodocus and Barosaurus, on the other hand, were in the subfamily Diplodocinae, which contained more slender diplodocids. Brontosaurus was another good example of an apatosaurine, also having a bulkier build, though it was on average a bit smaller than Apatosaurus itself. Apatosaurines and diplodocines often coexisted. Differences in their teeth morphology possibly suggest the apatosaurines ate tougher vegetation.

On top of being fellow apatosaurines, Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were for a long time seen as the same genus. Apatosaurus was first described in 1877 by the renowned Othniel C. Marsh, based on fossils unearthed in Colorado. Its generic name, meaning “deceptive lizard”, is a reference to its tail vertebrae, which Marsh noted were easy to confuse with those of mosasaurs. Two years later, Marsh would describe Brontosaurus as its own genus, but a study published in 1903 would find the two were too similar to be distinct on a generic level. Apatosaurus was named first, so if the two were the same genus, its name would have priority, so the species referred to Brontosaurus were reassigned to Apatosaurus. The name Brontosaurus would fall out of use among scientists, but the name would enter the public consciousness thanks to some mounted skeletons labeled as such. One popular misconception is that Brontosaurus was renamed to Apatosaurus due to the wrong skull being assigned to said skeletons, namely the skull of Camarasaurus. This did happen, but it has no bearing on the validity of Brontosaurus. In 2015, a new study found that the two were distinct after all.

There is some debate over how sauropods, especially the diplodocids, held their necks. It seems to be obvious that a large herbivore would evolve an elongated neck to feed from tall trees, but some studies have found the neck was habitually held straight out on these animals. Recent studies have, however, cast doubt on this idea. Even if it did hold its neck high, Apatosaurus wouldn’t have been the tallest browser in its environment. Brachiosaurus, for instance, stood a lot taller than it, but the difference in feeding height allowed the Morrison sauropods to reduce competition for food. Rock layers studied from the Morrison Formation suggest Apatosaurus inhabited a vast floodplain, with a multitude of river systems lined by dense forests. Tall conifers would’ve dotted surrounding fern savannas. It appears to have been a semi-arid region with pronounced wet and dry seasons. Some notable dinosaurs from the Morrison, in addition to the aforementioned sauropods, included taxa like Dryosaurus, Camptosaurus, Stegosaurus, Ceratosaurus, Torvosaurus, and Allosaurus. The latter two theropods were probably the main threat to Apatosaurus.

Denversaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Nodosauridae > Panoplosaurini

Overview: Sharing the same environment as the infamous Tyrannosaurus, Denversaurus was lucky to have such extensive armor. This dermal armor, formed out of rows of osteoderms, grew along its neck, sides, back, and tail. Some were smaller, oval-shaped scutes, others around its neck and shoulders were often significantly larger. Denversaurus, like other ankylosaurs, wasn’t armored on its underbelly, however. It would’ve been vulnerable if flipped over, which was certainly doable for an adult Tyrannosaurus. Smaller predators like Acheroraptor were no real threat to Denversaurus, however, at least when this animal reached its adult size. Denversaurus grew to be about six or so meters in length, making it decently large by ankylosaur standards. Scientists specifically classify it in the family Nodosauridae, within the tribe Panoplosaurini. Denversaurus was closely related to taxa like Edmontonia and Panoplosaurus itself. The tribe flourished in the latter part of the Cretaceous.

Fossils now referred to Denversaurus were first discovered in South Dakota back in the mid-1980’s, within the famous Hell Creek Formation, making it among the last of the non-avian dinosaurs. The bones were originally referred to its relative Edmontonia, but paleontologist Robert T. Bakker saw it as a distinct genus, describing Denversaurus as such in 1988. Its name honors the city of Denver, Colorado, where the fossils were stored at that time. Other paleontologists questioned the validity of Denversaurus as its own genus, but most recent studies seem to support it. Denversaurus shared a lot in common with Edmontonia. The two were slender-snouted, low-browsing ankylosaurs. Like its relative, Denversaurus probably possessed a large set of shoulder spines, though it likely lacked a bony club on its tail, as was common for nodosaurids. Most confirmed fossils of Denversaurus include skull material and pieces of its dermal armor.

Liliensternus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Coelophysoidea (?)

Overview: Measuring more than five meters in length, Liliensternus was among the largest known theropods from the Late Triassic. It was comparable in size to some Early Jurassic theropods like Dilophosaurus and Cryolophosaurus. Similar to such dinosaurs, Liliensternus was quite lightly built, however. Theropods started out as small, slender animals, often living in the shadow of far larger, non-dinosaurian predators. It seems that greater body length proceeded comparable bulk. Still, we can assume that Liliensternus was one of the top predators of its own environment. It’s known to have lived in the same general time and region as the famous “prosauropod” Plateosaurus, which was likely a source of prey for this animal. Fully grown Plateosaurus were probably fairly tough to kill, often being larger than Liliensternus and equipped with enormous claws. Fossils of both can be found within the rocks of Germany’s Trossingen Formation.

Liliensternus was first described as a distinct genus in 1984. Its generic name was chosen in honor of the German nobleman, Count Hugo Rühle von Lilienstern, who first collected the fossils back in the 1930’s. Lilienstern was an amateur paleontologist, often housing and displaying specimens within his own castle, in what is today the German state of Thuringia. Originally, the bones were thought to belong to a genus called Halticosaurus, which is nowadays usually seen as a dubious taxon. The features on the known fossils of Liliensternus set it apart and are diagnostic, so it itself is valid as a taxon. With its fairly long neck and narrow-snouted skull, Liliensternus was similar to Coelophysis from North America, albeit much larger. Some classify it close to Coelophysis, placing it within the same coelophysoid superfamily. Others classify Liliensternus as a more derived neotheropod, closer to Dilophosaurus. Similar to Dilophosaurus, it may’ve possessed a pair of crests along its snout.

Anchiceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia > Coronosauria > Ceratopsoidea > Ceratopsidae > Chasmosaurinae

Overview: Anchiceratops was formally described as a genus in 1914 by the renowned fossil hunter Barnum Brown, best known for his discovery of the Tyrannosaurus holotype over a decade prior. His description was based on a set of fossils he discovered a couple years before, in what is now the Canadian province of Alberta. Brown mainly had skull material to work with, but other remains of the animal would later be described. Anchiceratops translates from Greek as “near horned face”, a reference to Brown’s belief that the animal was a kind of transitional stage leading to Triceratops from earlier and more basal ceratopsids. We can’t be sure, of course, if Anchiceratops really was a direct ancestor of its more famous cousin. The two did belong to the Chasmosaurinae, one of the two main ceratopsid subfamilies, alongside the Centrosaurinae. Anchiceratops, like most members of said subfamily, possessed a fairly narrow snout, a small nasal horn, and longer brow horns.

Ceratopsids can be told apart most easily by observing their cranial ornamentation. In the case of Anchiceratops, it possessed a long, rectangular skull frill. It had large openings that would’ve been covered by skin and scales in life, as well as large, triangular hornlets running along the rim. These were probably used as display structures. Its brow horns were also likely used for display, but also for physical defense. Anchiceratops had to contend with large tyrannosaurids like Albertosaurus, which was probably the region’s top predator at that time. It itself would’ve eaten low-lying plants like ferns or perhaps some early flowering bushes. The beak at the front of its jaws was useful for snapping and cropping branches, while its cheek teeth were well suited for shearing. Fossil remains of Anchiceratops are known from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation and the Oldman Formation. It may also be known from the St. Mary River Formation.

Xinjiangtitan

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Mamenchisauridae

Overview: Xinjiangtitan takes its name from the Xinjiang region of western China, covered today in large swathes of desert and mountain ranges. In the Middle Jurassic, this region was far more wet and lush, with large river systems and lakes dotting the landscape. Conifers, cycads, ferns, ginkgoes and horsetails are among the plants that would’ve grown here, acting as food for Xinjiangtitan and a wide variety of other herbivores. As to what specific herbivores it coexisted with, we can’t be sure, as Xinjiangtitan is currently the only dinosaur yet described from the Qiketai Formation. Fossilized remains of Xinjiangtitan were first recovered in 2012, leading to its eventual description a year later. It’s primarily based on most of its neck vertebrae, portions of the spinal vertebrae, rib material, the pelvis, some leg bones, and a good bit of the tail.

The known remains of Xinjiangtitan paint the picture of a truly remarkable animal, counted among the largest dinosaurs ever found in China. It likely grew to be at least thirty meters in length, with a weight of a few dozen tons. Sauropods, it seems, were already reaching enormous sizes by the end of the Middle Jurassic. The neck alone was quite astonishing, representing one of the longest necks of any known animal, long even by sauropod standards. It alone was up to fifteen or so meters long. This allowed Xinjiangtitan to feed at a significantly higher level than other herbivores, allowing it to avoid direct competition. Such a neck is to be expected considering its classification, with scientists tending to classify Xinjiangtitan within the family Mamenchisauridae. Mamenchisaurus itself was a contender for having the longest known sauropod neck.

Neimongosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Therizinosauria > Therizinosauroidea > Therizinosauridae

Overview: Known fossil material from this herbivorous theropod includes much of the neck, the shoulders, arm bones, spinal vertebrae, part of the pelvis, most of its legs, most of the tail, and a part of the lower jaw. This makes it fairly well represented as far as therizinosaurs go. The first of these fossils were found in the late 1990’s, in what is today the region of Inner Mongolia, in China. Described in 2001, its generic name refers to where it was discovered. If it were found a decade or more prior, paleontologists would probably be fairly perplexed by Neimongosaurus. Therizinosaurs have been known to science for quite a while in terms of fossil remains, but what the group was has only been determined relatively recently. Neimongosaurus and its relatives belonged to a clade of rather bizarre maniraptoran theropods; herbivores that evolved from carnivorous ancestors.

The general overall appearance of Neimongosaurus was typical for a therizinosaur. It stood with a semi-upright posture, had an oddly shaped pelvis, an enlarged first toe, a long neck, narrow skull, and enormous arms. Each hand sported three sickle-like claws that were useful for pulling down the branches of trees, for digging up tubers, and probably for defense. Being a maniraptoran, there is a good chance that Neimongosaurus would’ve had some form of feathers or proto-feathers. As a member of the family Therizinosauridae, it was one of the more derived therizinosaurs, but quite a bit smaller than some of its relatives – Therizinosaurus in particular grew to be quite enormous. All known Neimongosaurus fossils come from the Iren Dabasu Formation, so it likely lived around ninety-million years ago, in a warm and semi-arid region.

Jinfengopteryx

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Paraves > Troodontidae

Overview: The northeast of China is well known for its exquisitely preserved dinosaur fossils, with a large number of them including impressions of feathers or soft tissue around the skeleton. Famous geological formations in the area include the Yixian and Tiaojishan. Perhaps not as well known is the Huajiying Formation, from which Jinfengopteryx was unearthed, as well as a decent number of other Early Cretaceous-aged animals, including some true birds. Jinfengopteryx itself was a relative of birds, belonging to the clade Paraves. Some earlier studies placed it close to Archaeopteryx from Europe, even within the family Archaeopterygidae, but most modern studies classify Jinfengopteryx as a more basal paravian. It was likely a member of the family Troodontidae, possibly representing a subfamily called the Jinfengopteryginae, though it’s debated what members would belong to it.

Troodontids tended to be quite birdlike in their overall anatomy. Most people would likely mistake Jinfengopteryx for a bird, fossil evidence showing that most of its body was covered in feathers. It did have some distinctly non-avian traits, however. Jinfengopteryx retained a long, albeit thin tail, a distinct set of clawed fingers, and toothed jaws. Many troodontids show signs of omnivory based on their tooth morphology. Some rounded structures in the gut region of the holotype are thought to be traces of seeds, suggesting Jinfengopteryx itself was an omnivore. Alternatively, these may’ve been developing eggs, at least according to some studies. Even if it did consume seeds, we can be fairly certain Jinfengopteryx also consumed small vertebrates and insects as well. There is still debate, but some recent anatomical studies suggest this animal may’ve been capable of flight.

Cetiosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Plateosauria > Massopoda > Sauropodiformes > Sauropoda > Gravisauria > Eusauropoda > Cetiosauridae

Overview: One of the most completely known sauropods ever found in England, the earliest known fossils of this creature were recovered in the 1820’s. This was before the concept of sauropods, or even of dinosaurs as a distinct clade, became widely known. Cetiosaurus was formally established as a genus in 1841 by Richard Owen, one of England’s most prolific naturalists. This was only a year or so prior to Owen’s establishment of the Dinosauria, but even then, he didn’t recognize this genus as a dinosaur. He believed Cetiosaurus to have been a giant, ocean-going animal similar to modern crocodiles, hence its generic name – the “whale lizard”. More complete fossils would be described in the 1860’s, revealing its dinosaurian nature, but its status as a sauropod wasn’t cemented until a series of discoveries made a decade or so later (largely in the United States). Many sauropods from Europe and elsewhere would be referred to this genus, incorrectly, as additional species.

Cetiosaurus is the namesake of the family Cetiosauridae, classified as one of the earlier branching groups within the larger clade Eusauropoda. They were more derived than genera like Vulcanodon, but less so than the mamenchisaurids, turiasaurs, and neosauropods (the group that contained the diplodocids, brachiosaurids, and titanosaurs). Some speculate cetiosaurids and mamenchisaurids may’ve been related in some way. Given its status as a basal eusauropod, Cetiosaurus had a myriad of fairly “primitive” traits. Growing to be about sixteen meters long, it was large, but nowhere near as big as some later sauropods. Patagosaurus may’ve been a close relative, though there is much debate over which sauropods really did belong to the Cetiosauridae. Cetiosaurus fossils are known from a couple different Middle Jurassic-aged geological formations in England. It probably lived alongside stegosaurs and some large theropods, potentially including the famous Megalosaurus.

Akainacephalus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Ankylosauridae > Ankylosaurinae

Overview: Akainacephalus was a close relative of the famous Ankylosaurus, though it lived around eight to ten million years earlier. The two dinosaurs belonged to the family Ankylosauridae, within the larger thyreophoran clade Ankylosauria. Like all ankylosaurs, Akainacephalus was protected by extensive dermal armor, formed out of bony scutes growing across the back, sides, neck, tail, and even on the head. Its generic name, meaning “thorny head”, refers to its cranial osteoderms, which took the form of pronounced, often pointed tile-like scutes. It would take a powerful predator to kill a fully grown adult. In addition to its armor, Akainacephalus also had a bony club at the end of its tail to give it a more active means of defense. Fossil evidence suggests that these clubs were likely used for intraspecific combat, probably between males, using side-to-side strikes.

Similar to other ankylosaurids, Akainacephalus was probably a low-browser, eating plants like ferns or early flowering shrubs. Ankylosaurids tended to have wider snouts than other ankylosaurs, such as those in the nodosaurid family, which suggests they were less selective feeders. The two groups often coexisted, suggesting they occupied different niches. Akainacephalus fossils are known from the Kaiparowits Formation of Utah, dated to about seventy-six million years ago. It would’ve lived alongside dinosaurs like Kosmoceratops, Nasutoceratops, Parasaurolophus, and Teratophoneus – a tyrannosaurid and probable apex predator on land. The waterways were home to large predators like Deinosuchus; a relative of modern crocodilians. Based on decent remains, the first specimen of Akainacephalus was discovered in the late 2000’s.

Phuwiangvenator

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea (?) > Megaraptora

Overview: Known from Thailand’s Sao Khua Formation, Phuwiangvenator would’ve lived about one hundred and twenty-five million years ago, in the Early Cretaceous. It coexisted with a number of other dinosaurs including spinosaurids, basal ornithomimosaurs, and a variety of sauropod taxa like Phuwiangosaurus. Remains of various other animals are also known from the Sao Khua. The region would’ve been a vast floodplain at that time, with a mostly semi-arid climate, though it appears to have been more humid and lush at certain points. Phuwiangvenator, with a length of about six or so meters, was one of the larger theropods in this environment. It probably went after medium to large-sized dinosaurs, but also smaller animals. Remains of a few other carnivorous theropods are also known from the Sao Khua, with these dinosaurs likely occupying different hunting niches.

Phuwiangvenator is based on partial fossil material, largely consisting of some vertebrae, leg bones, and part of a hand. This is fairly limited, but there are some diagnostic traits on these bones, which make it possible to both distinguish it from other theropods in the region and also tell what kind of animal it was. Studies usually classify Phuwiangvenator as a megaraptoran, making it related to the likes of Megaraptor, Tratayenia and Australovenator. It’s usually seen as a more basal genus within the group, which fits with it having lived in the Early Cretaceous. Megaraptorans tended to possess long arms, huge claws, narrow snouts, and overall lighter builds. They may’ve been coelurosaurs, or possibly allosauroids according to older studies. Described in 2019, Phuwiangvenator takes part of its generic name from the region of Phu Wiang, where it was found, similar to Phuwiangosaurus.

Edmontosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea > Hadrosauridae > Saurolophinae > Edmontosaurini

Overview: There are two accepted species of Edmontosaurus – the type species Edmontosaurus regalis and the geologically younger Edmontosaurus annectens. Getting to the point of one genus with two species has been complicated. Edmontosaurus regalis was first described in 1917 by the renowned Canadian paleontologist Lawrence M. Lambe, based on fossils found within the rocks of Alberta’s Horseshoe Canyon Formation. Said formation was previously known as the Edmonton, in honor of the nearby city, Edmontosaurus being named after both. Fossilized remains now referred to Edmontosaurus annectens were described by Othniel C. Marsh in the 1890’s, who assigned them to the genus Claosaurus as a new species (C. annectens). Later, fossils of this species would come to be associated with other genera, most prominently Trachodon. Edmontosaurus annectens fossil material would also be used to establish the genus Anatosaurus in the 1940’s, as well as Anatotitan in the 1990’s. Both supposed genera draw their name from a Latin root word meaning “duck”, as a reference to the wide, duck-like snout seen on E. annectens specifically.

Nowadays, the names Trachodon, Anatosaurus, and Anatotitan are all considered junior synonyms of Edmontosaurus. There are differences between the Edmontosaurus species. E. regalis tended to have a shorter, taller snout, as opposed to the more duck-like snout of E. annectens. Fossilized soft tissue traces on E. regalis reveals that some of them possessed fleshy, rooster-like head crests, but no such fossil evidence has yet been found on E. annectens. Said crest may’ve been present only on males, used for sexual display. Both species grew to be in excess of twelve meters long, making them among the largest known hadrosaurids, but E. annectens was often longer. Some studies find E. regalis to have been bulkier on average, however. Aside from these differences, the two had far more similarities. Both had the general hadrosaur body plan, being able to walk on their hind legs, but likely spent most of their time grazing down on all fours. Their bodies were sturdily built, set on strong limbs and the neural spines on the vertebrae were often quite tall along the tail. Both of the species were among the largest herbivores in their local environments.

Hadrosaurs are famous for their unique feeding adaptations. Like its kin, Edmontosaurus possessed a keratinous beak, well suited for snipping stems and snapping branches, but also columns of teeth towards the back of the mouth. These teeth were packed tightly together, creating a solid grinding surface, capable of processing even the toughest of plants. They would constantly be replaced as it grew, with no specimen ever being found with worn teeth or lacking them, which sets this creature apart from many herbivorous mammals (elephants famously starve to death in old age due to their teeth running out from wear). In the past, Edmontosaurus and its kin were thought to have mostly eaten soft water plants, living a semi-aquatic life. This was partly based on fossil mummies of the genus supposedly possessing traces of webbing on the hands. In reality, this turned out to be the remnants of padding on its front paws – Edmontosaurus was a land-dwelling animal. Fossils of the species E. annectens did live in a fairly wet, coastal environment, however. It lived alongside many famous Late Cretaceous dinosaurs like Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, and Tyrannosaurus.

Suskityrannus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Tyrannosauroidea > Pantyrannosauria

Overview: The first reported fossils of this basal tyrannosaur were unearthed in the late 1990’s, in the state of New Mexico. Recovered bones included parts of the skull, jaws, vertebrae and some limb bones, all dated to around or over ninety million years ago. Originally, the fossils were thought to have come from a dromaeosaurid, or “raptor” dinosaur, but this was soon disproven. It was, for a while, classified as a more generalized coelurosaur, but by the time it was described in 2019, the tyrannosauroid nature of the animal was generally accepted. Informally, the creature was known as the “Zuni tyrannosaur”, referring to New Mexico’s indigenous Zuni people. Suskityrannus would later be given its current, official generic name, which means “coyote tyrant”, partly derived from the language of the Zuni themselves. It both refers to it having been a relative of Tyrannosaurus, as well as to its assumed ecological niche, potentially similar to that of a modern coyote.

Suskityrannus was relatively small as far as its later relatives are concerned, though tyrannosaurs in general evolved from mostly smaller coelurosaurian ancestors. It was a fairly slender animal, with a much narrower skull than more derived tyrannosauroids. Some of its traits, however, do appear to have been more derived. For instance, its foot and ankle anatomy was much more like that of later tyrannosaurs, including Tyrannosaurus, than what we see in earlier tyrannosaurs. In a way, it filled a gap within the larger tyrannosauroid evolutionary tree, being more derived than Guanlong or Stokesosaurus, but less so than Timurlengia, Dryptosaurus or the true tyrannosaurids. We can assume it had slightly longer arms than its later kin, however, as well as three digits. It may also be possible that Suskityrannus retained the proto-feathers seen on many basal tyrannosaurs. Known from the Moreno Hill Formation, it may’ve coexisted with Zuniceratops and Nothronychus.

Limusaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Ceratosauria > Neoceratosauria > Abelisauroidea > Noasauridae > Elaphrosaurinae

Overview: Animals often go through pronounced physical changes as they age, but among the Dinosauria, Limusaurus is one of the more extreme examples of this. Fossil material belonging to the animal was first discovered in the early to mid-2000’s, in what is today the region of Xinjiang, in western China. Multiple specimens were found, notably of different growth stages, representing a decent amount of fossils. Limusaurus received its official description in 2009, published by the renowned Chinese paleontologist Xu Xing, among others. Its generic name is a combination of both Latin and Greek, meaning “mud lizard”, referring to the mudstone found encasing its remains. This appears to have been the remnants of a prehistoric mire, which trapped these Limusaurus specimens, leading to their deaths and eventual fossilization. This mudstone is a part of the Shishugou Formation, with those specific layers dated to the early part of the Late Jurassic. Limusaurus had to deal with a few predators like Guanlong, Sinraptor, and possibly Monolophosaurus.

Limusaurus was a fairly small theropod dinosaur, measuring around or a little over two meters long as an adult. It had a slender build, a fairly long neck, and quite tiny forelimbs. The skull of the adults had narrow, toothless jaws. Most notable, however, were the jaws of the juveniles. As we would expect, younger specimens had comparatively larger heads with stubbier proportions and large eyes, but they also had teeth. Limusaurus, it seems, started out with teeth, but would lose them as it grew, replacing them with a beak. This could also indicate a change of diet, with juveniles eating an assortment of insects or small vertebrates, while adults were omnivorous or even herbivorous. The genus belongs to an odd family of ceratosaurs called the Noasauridae and, more specifically, to a subfamily called the Elaphrosaurinae. Other related noasaurids may’ve had a similar change when reaching adulthood. The tiny arms seen on Limusaurus actually match a trend seen among most of the derived ceratosaur lineages, which tended to have ever smaller forelimbs.

Guaibasaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Sauropodomorpha > Guaibasauridae

Overview: Guaibasaurus is counted among the most basal of all known sauropodomorphs, placed within the family Guaibasauridae, for which it’s obviously the namesake. Like most of the earliest, basal sauropodomorphs, Guaibasaurus had a mix of sauropodomorph and theropod-like features. Based on its teeth, we can safely assume it was an omnivore, possibly leaning towards carnivory. It possibly ate a wide range of things including ferns, horsetails, insects, and small vertebrates. Most of its later sauropodomorph relatives were strictly herbivorous, but like all dinosaur lineages, they evolved from a fully carnivorous ancestor. Said ancestor was also a biped, unlike the sauropods or many other more derived sauropodomorphs, but Guaibasaurus itself retained this trait. Overall, it was a lightly built creature with a semi-elongated neck and a long, narrow-snouted skull.

Some potential relatives of Guaibasaurus may’ve included Unaysaurus and Macrocollum, though in recent studies, both are classified in the separate unaysaurid family. Saturnalia is another dinosaur sometimes seen as related to Guaibasaurus, but it’s often classified in a separate Saturnaliidae. In a few studies, Guaibasaurus is classified as more derived than Saturnalia or the related Eoraptor. The first fossils of Guaibasaurus were discovered in the 1990’s, in what is now southern Brazil. Officially described in 1999, its generic name refers to the Rio Guaíba, a body of water present in the region where it was found, a kind of lake or estuary leading from various rivers into a large lagoon. Known fossils of Guaibasaurus come from Brazil’s Caturrita Formation, dating it to around two hundred and twenty-five million years ago, in the Late Triassic.

Tongtianlong

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Coelurosauria > Maniraptora > Pennaraptora > Oviraptorosauria > Caenagnathoidea > Oviraptoridae

Overview: While excavating a spot designated for a new school, a team of workers in the Jiangxi Province of China came across the fossilized remains of a highly birdlike dinosaur. In 2016, these remains were formally described as a new genus of oviraptorosaur – Tongtianlong. Tongtianlong takes part of its name from the Tongtian’yan Grottoes located near where it was found, as well as from the Mandarin Chinese word for “dragon”, commonly used for Chinese dinosaur genera. With its boxy skull and short, toothless beak, Tongtianlong was clearly a derived oviraptorosaur. Earlier oviraptorosaurs tended to have longer skulls and often retained some teeth. Phylogenetic studies classify Tongtianlong within the family Oviraptoridae, so it was closely related to Oviraptor itself. It was also around the same size as Oviraptor, growing to be about two meters in length.

Oviraptorosaurs were relatively derived maniraptoran dinosaurs, so we can assume they possessed extensive feather covering in life. Fossil evidence supports this, with many oviraptorids being found with their “wings” outstretched over their nests, in a fashion similar to that of brooding birds. Such feathers also insulated their own bodies and provided structures for courtship and threat displays. In addition to its feathers, many oviraptorids, Tongtianlong included, possessed bony head crests. That of Tongtianlong, however, had a slightly different shape in comparison to those usually seen among its family. This could be an adaptation to distinguish it from other oviraptorids, as a large number of oviraptorid genera are known to have lived in Jiangxi at around the same time. Many of these oviraptorids, like Tongtianlong, come from the rocks of the Nanxiong Formation.

Graciliceratops

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Marginocephalia > Ceratopsia > Neoceratopsia

Overview: Fossils of this small ceratopsian were first discovered in the early 1970’s by a joint team of Polish and Mongolian paleontologists, in the southeast of Mongolia. Polish researchers went on to describe the fossils a few years later, referring them to the genus Microceratus (then known as Microceratops, but later renamed as it was already in use for a wasp genus). However, some later studies would find the holotype remains of Microceratus to lack enough diagnostic traits, finding it to be a dubious taxon. So, in 2000, the renowned American paleontologist Paul C. Sereno officially re-described Graciliceratops as its own, separate genus. Its name, meaning “slender horned face”, is a reference to the animal’s overall light build, even in comparison to other early ceratopsians. The majority of said animals were still more than ten million years away from becoming truly huge.

Known fossil material from Graciliceratops includes portions of the skull, lower jaw, limb bones, the spinal vertebrae, and a piece of the pelvis. The holotype appears to have been quite small, at about sixty centimeters (two feet) in length. Studies suggest this was most likely a juvenile. Adults may’ve been between one and two meters long, or possibly slightly larger. Restorations of Graciliceratops, in most cases, depict it as a biped. This was probably the case based on its limb morphology, but it was a bit more derived than some other bipedal ceratopsians. Studies classify it confidently within the Neoceratopsia and possibly even the Coronosauria, though it was almost certainly more basal than Protoceratops and its kin. Graciliceratops fossils come from the Bayan Shireh Formation, so it likely coexisted with other notable dinosaurs like Segnosaurus, Garudimimus, and Achillobator.

Probactrosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea

Overview: Probactrosaurus was a medium-sized iguanodont belonging to the Hadrosauroidea. This made it a relative of the true “duck-billed” hadrosaurids, including Hadrosaurus itself, but it seems to have been too “primitive” to belong to the Hadrosauridae proper. It may’ve been the closest of the hadrosauroids to the clade Hadrosauromorpha, a group containing the hadrosaurids and all of the hadrosauroids most closely related to them. One such hadrosauroid was Bactrosaurus, a genus Probactrosaurus was once thought to be directly ancestral to. They were clearly relatives, but this is no longer accepted as likely. Their overall anatomy was similar, however. Probactrosaurus was a sturdily built, low-grazing herbivore capable of walking on all fours or as a biped. Its arms appear to have been more slender than those of its later relatives, so it was less well adapted for the former.

Sources of food for this animal included conifers, ferns, cycads, horsetails, and tubers. The front of its jaws were equipped with a keratinous beak, used to snip branches and stems, quickly processed by the many rows of grinding “cheek teeth” behind the beak. Probactrosaurus had narrower jaws, so it may’ve been more selective about what it ate. Like other hadrosauroids, it probably would’ve lived in groups or even large herds for added protection against predators. It had no real means of physical defense like armor or spines. Probactrosaurus was first described in 1966 by the renowned Russian paleontologist Anatoly K. Rozhdestvensky, based on fossils unearthed from the rock layers of the Miaogou Formation, in China’s Inner Mongolian region. It lived in a fairly warm environment alongside the ankylosaur Gobisaurus and the carcharodontosaur Shaochilong.

Allosaurus

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Saurischia > Theropoda > Neotheropoda > Tetanurae > Avetheropoda > Carnosauria > Allosauroidea > Allosauridae

Overview: Aside from the infamous Tyrannosaurus, Allosaurus is probably one of the best known theropods to the general public. It’s been featured in various documentaries, encyclopedias, and a number of popular works of fiction. Fossils attributed to the genus are primarily known from what is now the western United States, but also along the coast of Portugal, within rock layers dated to the Late Jurassic. Within those regions, Allosaurus would’ve been among the largest predators. It’s often speculated to have been a specialized sauropod killer, probably hunting the young or sick, but we can assume it would’ve hunted other prey as well. It was lightly built in comparison to some other theropods, but still quite powerful, sporting fairly strong arms equipped with three claws on each hand. The skull wasn’t as strongly built as those of tyrannosaurs, so its jaws were mainly suited to stripping flesh, not crushing bone. However, the jaws could flex quite a bit, allowing it to open its mouth remarkably wide to inflict massive wounds. One other notable trait were the prominent crests it sported in front of each eye, running along its snout, likely used for visual display.

Fossils that probably belong to Allosaurus were first reported in the late 1860’s, found in Colorado, consisting of partial tail vertebrae. In 1870, paleontologist Joseph M. Leidy would refer this bone to a new genus called Antrodemus. Othniel C. Marsh would later describe somewhat more complete fossils in 1877, establishing Allosaurus as a genus. Part of its name was taken from the Greek word for “other” or “different”, inspired by features on its vertebrae, setting it apart from other dinosaur genera Marsh had previously described. Studies in the 1920’s found the fossils of both genera to be from the same animal. Antrodemus was named first, so for a number of decades, paleontologists would use said name to refer to this animal. However, in the 1970’s, an influential study noted that Antrodemus was based on very scant material that may lack diagnostic traits, leading to Allosaurus coming back into use. Many more Allosaurus specimens have been found over the past century, in many cases being relatively complete, making it a very well understood theropod. Currently, there are up to four potential species – A. fragilis, A. europaeus, A. jimmadseni, and possibly A. anax.

Allosaurus fragilis is the type species of Allosaurus, found in the Morrison Formation of the United States, as is the case with Allosaurus jimmadseni. Allosaurus europaeus, from Portugal’s Lourinhã Formation, may be invalid or the same as A. fragilis, according to one recent study. Allosaurus anax is a bit more controversial. Its fossils were, for many years, attributed to a related and now dubious genus called Saurophaganax. Recent studies have found said genus to be based on chimeric fossils from a sauropod, mixed with those of a very large Allosaurus species, hence A. anax. Estimates for the size of Allosaurus vary. Adults averaged around eight to nine meters long, but isolated fossils of A. anax suggest it could grow to be much larger, up to eleven meters or more. All species belong to the family Allosauridae, a part of the larger superfamily Allosauroidea, making them earlier or basal kin of the carcharodontosaurids. In the Morrison Formation, it may’ve coexisted with Stegosaurus, Camptosaurus, Diplodocus, Apatosaurus, Camarasaurus, Ceratosaurus, and Torvosaurus. The latter two were also large-bodied theropods, possibly occupying different hunting niches.

Gonkoken

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Neornithischia > Cerapoda > Ornithopoda > Iguanodontia > Ankylopollexia > Styracosterna > Hadrosauriformes > Hadrosauroidea

Overview: Described in 2023, the genus Gonkoken is based on a set of partial remains unearthed in the south of Chile. The first of these bones were found around a decade prior, within the sediment of the Dorotea Formation, dated to fairly late into the Cretaceous Period. Other notable dinosaurs from the Dorotea would include the odd, tiny ankylosaur genus Stegouros, while fossils of as of yet unnamed sauropods, megaraptorids, and unenlagiine dromaeosaurids have also been found. Fossils of marine reptiles, mammals, and fish are also present. The generic name of Gonkoken is translated from Tehuelche into English as “like a duck” or “like a swan”, Tehuelche being the language of the native people within the area where it was found. It’s a fitting name for a dinosaur belonging to the superfamily Hadrosauroidea, to which the famous “duck-billed” dinosaurs belonged.

Gonkoken appears to have been less derived than the true hadrosaurid “duck-bills”, but it was one of the more derived non-hadrosaurid members of the Hadrosauroidea. Studies have found it to be a potential member of the clade Hadrosauromorpha. Derived hadrosauroids were once thought to be absent in South America and native only to the northern hemisphere, but fossils of hadrosaurids like Kelumapusaura reveal this was untrue. Kelumapusaura belonged to the clade Austrokritosauria (a part of the hadrosaurid subfamily Saurolophinae). Gonkoken doesn’t belong to this lineage, so it being present when and where it was shows us that hadrosauroids were fairly diverse, even within South America. Within its local environment, Gonkoken probably filled a niche similar to most of its relatives, grazing on low-level vegetation, possibly in herds or groups for protection.

Borealopelta

Phylogeny: Dinosauria > Ornithischia > Genasauria > Thyreophora > Thyreophoroidea > Eurypoda > Ankylosauria > Euankylosauria > Nodosauridae > Nodosaurinae

Overview: Many ankylosaurs are only known from partial remains or bits of dermal armor, but in a few cases, some remarkably well preserved specimens are found. Perhaps the best of such remains were accidently unearthed in 2011, at an oil sands mine in northern Alberta. Workers would report the find to paleontologists, who initially suspected the remains would be those of a marine reptile, since the Clearwater Formation mostly preserves ocean-going life. However, what they found was a beautifully intact head, neck, shoulders, and torso of a nodosaurid ankylosaur – all of it preserved in three dimensions, unlike many fossils which are crushed and warped by time. Studies concluded the fossils were of a new genus, later named Borealopelta in its 2017 description. Its generic name means “northern shield”, referring to it being farther north than many other Canadian dinosaurs, as well as to its extensive armor plating. Smaller osteoderms covered the head, large spined plates sat over the neck, long spines extended from the shoulders, and rounded scutes covered the back and hips of the animal. All of these osteoderms are positioned where they would’ve been in life.

How exactly this Borealopelta specimen wound up at sea isn’t fully understood, though its carcass may’ve been washed into the sea by a river or storm. As it began to decompose, the body bloated, floating on the surface, but it eventually sank upside down into the seabed. Its back was obscured and covered by sediment, preserving it for future fossilization. Even the keratin encasing the bone cores of its spines is preserved in some places. Studies would even find traces of pigment cells on its fossilized skin, revealing the top part of its body was a dark, reddish color, while underneath it was paler. This counter-shading was itself a form of camouflage, making it harder to contrast the body from its surroundings. Even if it were detected, Borealopelta was safe from most predators, at least as an adult, though its underbelly was less protected. With a length of five to six meters, it was a decently large nodosaurid. Nodosaurids, like Borealopelta itself, tended to possess narrower jaws than those of the ankylosaurids, implying a more selective diet. No tail has been found as of yet, but as a nodosaurid, we can confidently predict it would’ve lacked one.

Lessemsaurus